30.11.2012 Aufrufe

2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

logical contradictions of RT, since presence of such<br />

contradictions brings "to zero" the value of any theory.<br />

Many disputable and contradictory points of this theory<br />

and its corollaries are considered in detail in the book.<br />

The lack of logical and physical grounding for fundamental<br />

concepts in the special and general relativity<br />

theory, such as time, space, the relativity of simultaneity<br />

etc., is demonstrated. A critical analysis of experiments<br />

that resulted in the generation and establishment of<br />

relativity theory is presented in this book. The detailed<br />

criticism of dynamical SRT concepts is also given in<br />

the book. The inconsistency and groundlessness in a<br />

seemingly "working" section of the relativity theory -<br />

the relativistic dynamics - is shown." - Lit.-Angaben:<br />

S. 210-221; nach Sprachen gegliedert.<br />

Afterword. - S. 204: "Many methodical and logical<br />

problems of the relativity theory was demonstrated in<br />

the book. The presence of methodical "problems of<br />

explanation" leads to the "blowing the theory at an empty<br />

place". But the presence of logical contradictions puts the<br />

final point in the development of any physical theory.<br />

In Chapter 1 of the book the logical inconsistency of<br />

SRT kinematics was proved on the basis of mental<br />

experiments. Chapter 2 was dedicated to logical contradictions<br />

of GRT. The absolute experimental inconsistency<br />

of the relativity theory was shown in Chapter<br />

3." - S. 205: "... the case of modern scientists "near"<br />

the relativity theory. They try to consolidate their status<br />

by administrative means for ever. We take, for example,<br />

the creation of "The Commission for Fight with Pseudo-<br />

Science". Simingly, the declared purpose is "rather noble":<br />

to protect our land from charlatans. However,<br />

analogous organizations are absent in majority of other<br />

countries and nothing happens to their purses. In our<br />

country the practice of examination before financial<br />

decisions was also present always. From ideas viewpoint,<br />

the scientific association itself has abilities to<br />

separate incorrect ideas, and, especially as immunity to<br />

charlatanism." - S. 205: "The situation becomes more<br />

clear, when the following opinion is scored for sound:<br />

someone having doubt as to relativity theory is not<br />

physicist. Different opinions, theories, schools can exist<br />

on any other question. But suddenly "the hub of the<br />

universe" is discovered - it cannot be discussed. And<br />

how must we treat physicists before 1905: whether<br />

they are not physicists? And how must we treat<br />

physicists from 20th century (including some Nobel<br />

Prize winners), since they were opponents to the<br />

relativity theory? Are they all not physicists? How can<br />

science be generally progressing without free discussion<br />

of ideas and their gradual understanding? - S. 206:<br />

"Unfortunately, the situation with the relativity theory<br />

cannot be remedied with the help of separate publications.<br />

Even if most scientist will understand the error<br />

of the relativity theory, it will be rather difficult to<br />

"blow off this soap-bubble". - "Since even recently<br />

"there organized" the expulsion of SRT opponents from<br />

Academy of Sciences."<br />

G. O. Mueller: SRT. Kap. 4-Erg.<br />

52<br />

Arteha, S. N. 2005 ca.<br />

La critique de concepts fondamentaux de la théorie<br />

de la relativité / S. N. Artekha [Übers. aus d. Russ.].<br />

- [Rußland]: WWW 2005 ca.. 250 S.<br />

Originalausgabe: Kritika osnov teorii otnositelnosti. 2004.<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie. Internet: URL<br />

www.antidogma.ru/.<br />

Asija, Our Pal 2009<br />

SRT v/s SRT (Special Relativity Theory versus Science<br />

Reality and Truth): from Aristotle to Einstein even to<br />

date same folly rules the paradigm of special relativity<br />

/ Our Pal Asija. - ]Land?]: WWW 2009. 8 S.<br />

URL: http://www.worldsci.org/pdf/abstracts/<br />

abstracts_4442.pdf - Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Aspden, Harold 1983<br />

Meson lifetime dilation as a test for special relativity.<br />

In: Lettere al Nuovo cimento. 37. 1983, S. 8 u. 307.<br />

Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Barone 2002 (Ritardo).<br />

Aspden, Harold 1999<br />

About time: my challenge of Einstein theory / Harold<br />

Aspden. - [Großbritannien]: WWW 1999. 5 S.<br />

URL: http://www.energyscience.co.uk/tu/14.html.<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Aspden, Harold 2001<br />

A critical opinion on Einstein's theory / Harold Aspden.<br />

- [England]: WWW 2001. 21 S.<br />

(Lecture. No. IIIb.)<br />

URL: http://www.aspden.org/books/Poc/IIIb.html<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Aspden, Harold 2007<br />

Physics with Aspden - The physics of creation [Homepage]:<br />

URL: www.aspden.org / Harold Aspden. -<br />

[Großbritannien]: WWW 2007.<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Asquith, P. R. 2004<br />

Einstein's logical errors: [datiert: 5.11.04] / P. R.<br />

Asquith.<br />

In: The general science journal. 2004 =<br />

http://wbabin.net/physics/asquith2.pdf - 5 S.<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie<br />

Asquith, P. R. 2004<br />

The symmetry of relative motion: [datiert: 1.11.04] /<br />

P. R. Asquith.<br />

Textversion 1.2 - 2012

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!