2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen
Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.
logical contradictions of RT, since presence of such<br />
contradictions brings "to zero" the value of any theory.<br />
Many disputable and contradictory points of this theory<br />
and its corollaries are considered in detail in the book.<br />
The lack of logical and physical grounding for fundamental<br />
concepts in the special and general relativity<br />
theory, such as time, space, the relativity of simultaneity<br />
etc., is demonstrated. A critical analysis of experiments<br />
that resulted in the generation and establishment of<br />
relativity theory is presented in this book. The detailed<br />
criticism of dynamical SRT concepts is also given in<br />
the book. The inconsistency and groundlessness in a<br />
seemingly "working" section of the relativity theory -<br />
the relativistic dynamics - is shown." - Lit.-Angaben:<br />
S. 210-221; nach Sprachen gegliedert.<br />
Afterword. - S. 204: "Many methodical and logical<br />
problems of the relativity theory was demonstrated in<br />
the book. The presence of methodical "problems of<br />
explanation" leads to the "blowing the theory at an empty<br />
place". But the presence of logical contradictions puts the<br />
final point in the development of any physical theory.<br />
In Chapter 1 of the book the logical inconsistency of<br />
SRT kinematics was proved on the basis of mental<br />
experiments. Chapter 2 was dedicated to logical contradictions<br />
of GRT. The absolute experimental inconsistency<br />
of the relativity theory was shown in Chapter<br />
3." - S. 205: "... the case of modern scientists "near"<br />
the relativity theory. They try to consolidate their status<br />
by administrative means for ever. We take, for example,<br />
the creation of "The Commission for Fight with Pseudo-<br />
Science". Simingly, the declared purpose is "rather noble":<br />
to protect our land from charlatans. However,<br />
analogous organizations are absent in majority of other<br />
countries and nothing happens to their purses. In our<br />
country the practice of examination before financial<br />
decisions was also present always. From ideas viewpoint,<br />
the scientific association itself has abilities to<br />
separate incorrect ideas, and, especially as immunity to<br />
charlatanism." - S. 205: "The situation becomes more<br />
clear, when the following opinion is scored for sound:<br />
someone having doubt as to relativity theory is not<br />
physicist. Different opinions, theories, schools can exist<br />
on any other question. But suddenly "the hub of the<br />
universe" is discovered - it cannot be discussed. And<br />
how must we treat physicists before 1905: whether<br />
they are not physicists? And how must we treat<br />
physicists from 20th century (including some Nobel<br />
Prize winners), since they were opponents to the<br />
relativity theory? Are they all not physicists? How can<br />
science be generally progressing without free discussion<br />
of ideas and their gradual understanding? - S. 206:<br />
"Unfortunately, the situation with the relativity theory<br />
cannot be remedied with the help of separate publications.<br />
Even if most scientist will understand the error<br />
of the relativity theory, it will be rather difficult to<br />
"blow off this soap-bubble". - "Since even recently<br />
"there organized" the expulsion of SRT opponents from<br />
Academy of Sciences."<br />
G. O. Mueller: SRT. Kap. 4-Erg.<br />
52<br />
Arteha, S. N. 2005 ca.<br />
La critique de concepts fondamentaux de la théorie<br />
de la relativité / S. N. Artekha [Übers. aus d. Russ.].<br />
- [Rußland]: WWW 2005 ca.. 250 S.<br />
Originalausgabe: Kritika osnov teorii otnositelnosti. 2004.<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie. Internet: URL<br />
www.antidogma.ru/.<br />
Asija, Our Pal 2009<br />
SRT v/s SRT (Special Relativity Theory versus Science<br />
Reality and Truth): from Aristotle to Einstein even to<br />
date same folly rules the paradigm of special relativity<br />
/ Our Pal Asija. - ]Land?]: WWW 2009. 8 S.<br />
URL: http://www.worldsci.org/pdf/abstracts/<br />
abstracts_4442.pdf - Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Aspden, Harold 1983<br />
Meson lifetime dilation as a test for special relativity.<br />
In: Lettere al Nuovo cimento. 37. 1983, S. 8 u. 307.<br />
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Barone 2002 (Ritardo).<br />
Aspden, Harold 1999<br />
About time: my challenge of Einstein theory / Harold<br />
Aspden. - [Großbritannien]: WWW 1999. 5 S.<br />
URL: http://www.energyscience.co.uk/tu/14.html.<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Aspden, Harold 2001<br />
A critical opinion on Einstein's theory / Harold Aspden.<br />
- [England]: WWW 2001. 21 S.<br />
(Lecture. No. IIIb.)<br />
URL: http://www.aspden.org/books/Poc/IIIb.html<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Aspden, Harold 2007<br />
Physics with Aspden - The physics of creation [Homepage]:<br />
URL: www.aspden.org / Harold Aspden. -<br />
[Großbritannien]: WWW 2007.<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Asquith, P. R. 2004<br />
Einstein's logical errors: [datiert: 5.11.04] / P. R.<br />
Asquith.<br />
In: The general science journal. 2004 =<br />
http://wbabin.net/physics/asquith2.pdf - 5 S.<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie<br />
Asquith, P. R. 2004<br />
The symmetry of relative motion: [datiert: 1.11.04] /<br />
P. R. Asquith.<br />
Textversion 1.2 - 2012