2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

http://wbabin.net/mathis/prel4.htm - 4 S.
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Mathis, Miles 2003
How my corrections effect Minkowski's space-time
equations / Miles Mathis.
In: The general science journal. 2003 =
http://wbabin.net/mathis/mink.htm - 1 S.
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Mathis, Miles 2004
A correction to a famous equation [a = v²/r]: [datiert:
22.4.04] / Miles Mathis.
In: The general science journal. 2004 =
http://www.wbabin.net/mathis/mathis.htm - 8 S.
ART. GRAVIT. NEWTON.
Auszüge: "I have uncovered a basic error of math in
one of Newton's fundamental equations. The equation,
and Newton's derivation of it, has stood unquestioned
for centuries. The equation is used today in many esoteric
theories, including the derivation of the Schwarzchild
radius, the predicted intensity of a gravity wave, and on
and on. It is imported into these derivations as a known
fact. Furthermore, the equation is used in General
Relativity. It is one of the basic preconditions of several
parts of various tensors. I show that all these derivations
and computations are fatally compromised by this.
The equation is a = v²/r. We all learned this equation
in high school, in regard to uniform circular motion. It
states the relationship between an orbiting velocity and
centripetal acceleration. The reason the equation is used
so often in contemporary physics is that it is also
assumed to describe the relationship, in its simplest
form, between an orbiting body and the force of gravity
felt by that body. It is basic physics, and I would guess
that no one has looked hard at the equation in a very
long time. Certainly no one has had the perspicuity, or
the gumption, to question it in a high school physics
class. By the time a student of physics reaches college
such equations are not interesting anymore - they are
outgrown toys - ones to be used if needed, but never
closely examined."
Mathis, Miles 2004
A final argument against x' = x - vt / Miles Mathis.
In: The general science journal. 2004 =
http://wbabin.net/mathis/origin.htm - 2 S.
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Mathis, Miles 2005
A critique of general relativity / Miles Mathis.
In: The General science journal. 2005 =
http://wbabin.net/mathis/mathis17.htm - 9 S.
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Mathis, Miles 2005
The equation x' = x - vt, again! : [datiert: 1.1.05] /
Miles Mathis.
In: The general science journal. 2005 =
http://wbabin.net/mathis/mathis5.htm - 2 S.
SRT. MESS.
Auszüge: "I presented what I called my final argument
against this equation some time ago. But the issue refuses
to be put to rest. I have gotten letters from readers
for whom my shortest paper was not short and concise
enough. My argument has still not been put in its most
transparent form, apparently. Beyond that, I have found
the equation in a recent paper in American Journal of
Physics on the action principle and Noether's Theorem.
The authors claim that action is not invariant in a Galilean
transform, and they use this equation as the transform.
(...)
Once this is understood, the equation x' = x - vt
must fall. If these two x variables are understood as
points, then a Galilean transform will express their
separation at a given instant. The two variables x and x'
must be measured at the same time. But vt cannot provide
this separation, since there is no time or velocity at
an instant. Even those who think that the calculus can
find a velocity at an instant cannot argue that case here,
since our equations are algebraic, not differential or
integral. The equation x' = x - vt demands algebraic
definitions of time and velocity. In algebra there is no
velocity without a [delta]t, and there is no [delta]t at an
instant.
If the two x variables are thought of as [delta]x, then
the equation is false in that case, too: [delta]x' = [delta]x
- v[delta]t. In any Galilean transform, [delta]x = [delta]x'.
To find otherwise would be to find length contraction.
Length contraction is relativistic. If there is a length
contraction, then the situation is not Galilean, by definition.
"
Mathis, Miles 2005
How new transforms in special relativity affect mass,
momentum and energy equations: [datiert: 26.1.05]
/ Miles Mathis.
In: The general science journal. 2005 =
http://wbabin.net/mathis/mathis6.htm - 21 S.
SRT. MASSE. ENERGIE. EMC2. GEDEX.
"Introduction - In this paper I will derive new transformation
equations for mass, momentum and energy. I
will show that Einstein, despite using a thought problem
that was useful and mostly correct in variable assignments,
made several crucial errors that compromised
his final equations. The thought problem I am mainly
concerned with here is in his short paper of 1905, Does
the Inertia of a Body Depend upon its Energy Content?
Fully half of my paper is devoted to analyzing, critiquing
and expanding this thought problem and its math. The
rest of the paper is devoted to a variant thought problem
Textversion 1.2 - 2012 211
G. O. Mueller: SRT Kap. 4-Erg..