2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

lichen Transformationen, die sich durch die Werte für
einen Parameter unterscheiden. Die hier gewählte Alternative
wird als "Inertial-Transformation" bezeichnet
(S. 158). Diese Transformation negiert das Relativitätsprinzip
der SRT, macht das Äther-Konzept annehmbar,
macht die Gleichzeitigkeit absolut (S. 159). Als
weitere Folge läßt es alle Paradoxa der Relativistik
verschwinden (fa sparire anche tutti i paradossi del
relativismo). Als eine bereits gefundene experimentelle
Bestätigung der neuen Theorie auf Grundlage der
"Inertial-Transformation" wird der Sagnac-Effekt genannt,
den die SRT nicht erklären kann. (S. 162). Die
nachgewiesenen Effekte der SRT werden zu absoluten,
also nicht mehr relativen Effekten.
Sieht die Bedeutung der "Inerzial-TF" in der Überwindung
gewisser philosophisch-irrationaler Tendenzen
(certe tendenze filosofiche vagamente irrazionalistiche),
die das 20. Jahrhundert beherrscht haben (S.
164). � Bisher wurde in der Relativistik die Frage
der Konventionalität (als Theoriegrundlage) als nebensächlich
behandelt, auf jeden Fall aber allgemein
als akzeptable Grundlage hingestellt, die durch die
Autoritäten wie Poincaré u.a. sanktioniert worden ist.
Die Arbeiten der Bari-Schule von Franco Selleri nehmen
die Konventionalität als Grundlage der Physik
sehr ernst und zeigen nun, daß eine Konventionalität
grundsätzlich in Konkurrenz zu anderen, besser oder
schlechter begründeten Konventionalitäten steht und
sich in der Praxis als die beste bewähren muß, jedenfalls
keinen Wahrheitsanspruch erheben kann. Wir haben
noch keine Antwort der Relativisten auf diesen Angriff
aus Bari gesehen. Bevor er nicht in englischer Sprache
publiziert wird, ist mit einer internationalen Rezeption
leider nicht zu rechnen. Welcher Physiker außerhalb
Italiens liest Italienisch?
Rybczyk, Joseph A. 2002
Millennium relativity and the reciprocal factor - proof
that matter and energy are not interchangeable: [datiert:14.10.02]
/ Joseph A. Rybczyk.
In: The general science journal. 2002 =
http://wbabin.net/jr/recip.pdf - 2 S.
SRT. RP. MATERIE. ENERGIE. SOZIO.
Auszug: "It is the contention of this brief, that onesided
arguments are the principal reason that Einstein's
theory of relativity has survived as long as it has. What is
meant by this is that the theory and its supporting arguments
are usually presented from the limited perspective
of the observer's frame of reference. (...) The reciprocal
factor, as it will be referred to here, is not intended in the
strictly limited sense of a purely mathematical argument
but rather in the more general sense of an argument,
that also includes an appeal to common sense and logic.
(...)
The millennium reciprocal factor is simply a reference
to the opposite side of a relativistic argument, the
side in which the observer and, or, observer's frame of
G. O. Mueller: SRT. Kap. 4-Erg.
272
reference becomes the subject of the investigation rather
than the starting point. For example, if a star is moving
away from us at a large fraction of the speed of
light, then we in turn are moving away from that star at
that very same speed. This concept also applies to particles
moving at near light speed relative to the observer.
(...)
Although it is entirely reasonable to conclude that
an object under acceleration is subjected to influences
that the stationary observer is not subjected to, it is
entirely unreasonable to assume that this in some way
endows the accelerated object with special properties.
That is, relativistic principles are exactly that, "relativistic".
Although the object under acceleration can
take credit for bringing about the velocity related effects
defined in relativity, it cannot claim exclusive rights to
them. Relativistic effects are reciprocal in nature and
although velocity dependent, make no distinction
between the object being accelerated and other objects,
including those responsible for causing the acceleration.
Therefore, even with regard to the particle accelerator,
the relativistic effects taking place during any instant in
time, apply equally to the stationary observer, and the
stationary frame of reference. Otherwise, as stated
previously, we endow the particle and its frame of
reference with special properties, and subsequently
violate the second postulate of special relativity, and
the only postulate of the millennium theory.
Rybczyk, Joseph A. 2002
Millennium relativity proves Einstein wrong: [datiert:
19.9.02] / Joseph A. Rybczyk.
In: The general science journal. 2002 =
http://wbabin.net/jr/joseph.pdf - 6 S.
SRT. LK. ZD. C-K.
"The purpose of this paper is to introduce millennium
relativity, provide the source of proof as to the invalidity
of special relativity, and to solicit the support of the
scientific community and the general public in getting
the millennium papers published in appropriate science
journals. (...)
In general, millennium relativity is an intensely
systematic analysis of the evidence that is said to support
special relativity. During the analysis it can be clearly
seen where Einstein made a few missteps that led to a
theory steeped in contradictions and still debated to the
present day. In the process of unraveling this mystery,
one is confronted with one astonishing discovery after
another. In the end analysis, it is readily apparent that
relativistic principles are nothing more than an extension
of classical principles. (...)
The first repercussion of this new way of viewing
reference frames is the realization that contrary to special
relativity, horizontal distances in the direction of travel
are effected in exactly the same manner that vertical
distances are effected. That is, what Einstein saw as an
unchanging vertical distance between intersecting frames
Textversion 1.2 - 2012