2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

the earth's surface. If the earth's surface does not equate
to the vacuum condition, then these experimental results
cannot fully support the invariance of light speed. This
article presents that the experiments about the invariance
of light speed must be carried on the carrier moving
relative to Earth, thus may effectively eliminate the
possible influence of Earth factor."
Fernandez, Fabio 2001
Mathematics and the metaphysics of time in special
relativity: [zwei Briefe an R. Hersh, mit kurzen Antworten
von Hersh; datiert: 20.5.01] / Fabio Fernandez;
Reuben Hersh.
In: The general science journal. 2001 =
http://wbabin.net/physics/hersh.htm - 4 S.
SRT. MATH. ERK. SOZIO.
Auszug: "A Nobel Physics Prize judge (H. Nordenson)
says "it is a normal experience that when somebody
attempts to criticise or even analyse the fundamental
principles and/or definitions of the Theory of Relativity,
he is inevitably told that Einstein's theory is of a purely
mathematical nature and that anyone who is not a
specialist in mathematics is excluded from the possibility
of grasping its contents, that he is unduly prejudiced
and fettered by old traditions and ideas and that
he is innately alien to these revolutionary lines of thought
and therefore more or less incompetent to deal with
them." (...)
Isn't anything very wrong in all that mathematical
esoterism?
How come that a theory which is telling us about
the deep nature of the world we live in cannot be expressed
nor grasped through verbal thought and language,
which is richer, more nuanced and more versatile
than mathematics, and from which ultimately the
latter sprung up? Aren't physicists in general relying
too heavily in mathematics and too contaminated by
strong "mathematical Platonism" inasmuch as they seem
to be so convinced that Galileo was right when he
stated that "the book of nature is written in mathematical
form"? (...)
Being not too versed neither on mathematics nor
physics, I did meet many times the barrier described by
Nordenson (the "mathematical illiteracy accusation")
during my discussions with friends physicists whenever
I tried to raise any logical objections against not only
Relativity but also against any modern physical theories
based on philosophic-metaphysical assumptions (...)
... the true nature of many fundamental starting
assertions [sometimes disguised as conclusions] in
physics which being indeed of a sheer philosophical
nature but unjustifiable on philosophical grounds are
frequently alleged, when their philosophical unjustifiability
is pointed out, to be of a sheer mathematical
nature and justifiable only on mathematical grounds -and
that reminds me very much of the usual elusive
moves of besieged politicians. This barrier raised by
G. O. Mueller: SRT. Kap. 4-Erg.
120
the "mathematical illiteracy accusation" would surely
drive me to deep frustration would I take too seriously
the alleged capability of mathematics to prove or disprove
metaphysical propositions ... (...)
Note 3) By the way, despite my maths and physics
limitations I have some learned company in feeling
troubled by apparently logical aberrations in Einstein's
Special Relativity: if you feel interested in the subject,
please visit http://wbabin.net/paper.htm, where some
people who know much more maths and physics than
me share similar worries about Special Relativity; or
either read a David Deutsch's interview at
http://www.qubit.org/people/david/Articles/
PhilosophyNow.html
in which he talks a little about "passive acceptance" of
anti-logical assertions in the physical community all
over the 20th century."
Fernandez, Obdulio 1970
Intervención en homenaje a Julio Palacios.
In: Academia de ciencias exactas, fisicas y naturales
de Madrid. Revista. 64. 1970, p. 649-662.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Soler Ferran 2009 (Teoria).
Fernando, Viraj P. L. 2003
The physical basis of 'relativity' [Part 1]: 'relativity' -
an effect of background energy asserting as an initial
condition [datiert: 29.9.03] / Viraj P. L. Fernando.
In: The general science journal. 2003 =
http://wbabin.net/physics/viraj2.pdf - 17 S.
SRT. IS. RP. MINK. KINETIK. ENERGIE. TD.
Auszug: "This paper presents a novel approach that
uses thermodynamics as analogy and thereby brings
about a 'tectonic' transformation of the theory of relativity
from being one based on kinematics to one based
on kinetics - the action of energy. From this analogy an
absolute footing for the apparent kinematics of the
theory of relativity is readily obtained. Einstein's theory,
so to speak has so far been standing on its head with its
feet dangling in the mid-air of kinematics, whereas the
present paper turns it round and makes it stand on its
feet on the solid ground of action of energy! Thus our
theory negates the quasi- revolution of Albert Einstein
which has become a fetter to the progress of science,
and ushers in the long awaited real revolution in
physics!! (...)
Special Relativity is Successful because it Indirectly
takes the Local System into Account.
We contend that in special relativity, by way of
Minkowski's equation, what it does (without acknowledging
it) is that it takes the effects of energy of the
local system as a whole into account indirectly, instead
of taking the effects of action of energy of the observed
motion only, (as we shall show in detail in a future
paper). In this respect, special relativity merely pays lip
service to the principle of relativity by having it as its
Textversion 1.2 - 2012