30.11.2012 Aufrufe

2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

URL: http://www.gravitywarpdrive.com/<br />

Rethinking_Relativity.htm<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Bethell, Tom 2008<br />

Can we do without relativity? / Tom Bethell.<br />

In: The American spectator. 2009, Sept.; ca. 3<br />

S.; online ca. 7 S. Leserkommentare.<br />

URL: http://spectator.org/archives/2009/09/17/<br />

can-we-do-without-relativity<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie<br />

Bethell, Tom 2009<br />

Questioning Einstein: is relativity necessary? / Tom<br />

Bethell. - Pueblo West, CO: Vales Lake Pub. 2009.<br />

209 S. - Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: LOC.<br />

Bethell, Tom 2010<br />

Questioning Einstein: is relativity necessary?: NPA,<br />

Long Beach 2010, Proceedings / Tom Bethell. -<br />

[USA]: WWW 2010. 7 S.<br />

URL: http://www.worldsci.org/pdf/abstracts<br />

/abstracts_5363.pdf - Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Bethell, Tom 2010<br />

Relativity and relativism: something higher than the<br />

"I"; [anschließend Kommentare von Lesern] / Tom<br />

Bethell. - [USA]: WWW 2010. 2 S.<br />

URL: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/<br />

may/31/relativity-and-rela<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Birks, D. 2003<br />

A disproof of relativity (relativity as a mathematical<br />

virus): [datiert: 14.3.03] / D. and S. Birks.<br />

In: The general science journal. 2003 =<br />

http://wbabin.net/physics/birks.htm - 5 S.<br />

SRT. RAUM. ZEIT. GLZ. MATH.<br />

Auszug: "In these two statements, Relativists admit to<br />

not being able to assign a co-ordinate system and velocity<br />

vector in relation to intangible or "empty"space;<br />

but, then, somehow, by the assigning of, and comparison<br />

of, "stationary" and "moving" matter, they expect to<br />

establish a stationary co-ordinate system to measure<br />

intangible space and movement in reference to intangible<br />

space. This obvious contradiction has been rationalized<br />

in Relativistic theory by the introduction of time as<br />

simultaneity. Relativists theorize that somehow the<br />

synchronizing of events will give absolute position in<br />

space. They theorize that by comparing two intangibles<br />

(time and space which cannot be independently, tangibly<br />

measured) to each other, somehow they can then<br />

establish, not only a tangible measurement of both time<br />

and space, but, also, the measurement of absolute<br />

(stationary) position and movement of matter and<br />

energy.<br />

The obvious problem with this particular part of<br />

relativistic theory is that simultaneity does not indicate<br />

position. An event can happen simultaneously in London<br />

and New York: Simultaneity does not indicate position<br />

in space.<br />

The relativistic mathematics and theory concerning<br />

simultaneity, are simply another result of the mathematical<br />

virus first created and introduced in the Michelson-<br />

Morley Experiment of 1887. With the incorrect assigning<br />

and use of c and v (hypothetical velocity of light<br />

and the earth in reference to hypothetical aether and<br />

intangible space) as given mathematical values in the<br />

Michelson-Morley Experiment (and subsequent relativistic<br />

equations), Relativists have created and perpetuated<br />

the equivalent of a mathematical virus: A mathematical<br />

wild goose chase, which can be avoided by the<br />

understanding that absolute position and movement<br />

can not, as yet, be measured; and that dynamic comparisons<br />

of energy (light), the earth, rods, clocks, observers,<br />

etc. do not indicate absolute position or movement."<br />

Birks, D. 2003<br />

A mathematical disproof of the equation E = mc ²:<br />

[datiert: 26.3.03] / D. and S. Birks.<br />

In: The general science journal. 2003 =<br />

www.wbabin.net. Ca. 5 S.<br />

SRT. EMC2. MATH. ERK.<br />

"Introduction. - Einstein's equation, E = mc ², and<br />

Lorentz' ratio, 1 : (1- v ²/ c ²)[1/2], bring to light an<br />

issue concerning the use of the exponent that has been<br />

studiously avoided since the 1600's - an issue which<br />

actually invalidates these two equations and, consequently,<br />

invalidates Relativity."<br />

Birks, D. 2003<br />

Without clocks there would still be time: [datiert:<br />

21.4.03] / D. and S. Birks.<br />

In: The general science journal. 2003 =<br />

http://wbabin.net/physics/birks3.htm - 7 S.<br />

SRT. MMV. LICHT. ZEIT.<br />

"Abstract - This article, through an analysis of time<br />

and the mathematical symbols v and c demonstrates<br />

flaws in the logic and mathematics of The Theory of<br />

Relativity. (...)<br />

Taken in this context, the experiment, mathematics,<br />

and the negative or null results of the Michelson-Morley<br />

Experiment exemplify a problem faced throughout the<br />

ages, the same problem faced by Aristotle, Ptolemy,<br />

Galileo, Newton, etc. - the problem of establishment<br />

and measurement of absolute motion, and the search<br />

for an absolute reference. Therefore, the Michelson-<br />

Morley Experiment of 1887, as demonstrated and<br />

exemplified by the definitions of the mathematical<br />

Textversion 1.2 - 2012 73<br />

G. O. Mueller: SRT Kap. 4-Erg..

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!