2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen
Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.
URL: http://www.gravitywarpdrive.com/<br />
Rethinking_Relativity.htm<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Bethell, Tom 2008<br />
Can we do without relativity? / Tom Bethell.<br />
In: The American spectator. 2009, Sept.; ca. 3<br />
S.; online ca. 7 S. Leserkommentare.<br />
URL: http://spectator.org/archives/2009/09/17/<br />
can-we-do-without-relativity<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie<br />
Bethell, Tom 2009<br />
Questioning Einstein: is relativity necessary? / Tom<br />
Bethell. - Pueblo West, CO: Vales Lake Pub. 2009.<br />
209 S. - Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: LOC.<br />
Bethell, Tom 2010<br />
Questioning Einstein: is relativity necessary?: NPA,<br />
Long Beach 2010, Proceedings / Tom Bethell. -<br />
[USA]: WWW 2010. 7 S.<br />
URL: http://www.worldsci.org/pdf/abstracts<br />
/abstracts_5363.pdf - Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Bethell, Tom 2010<br />
Relativity and relativism: something higher than the<br />
"I"; [anschließend Kommentare von Lesern] / Tom<br />
Bethell. - [USA]: WWW 2010. 2 S.<br />
URL: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/<br />
may/31/relativity-and-rela<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Birks, D. 2003<br />
A disproof of relativity (relativity as a mathematical<br />
virus): [datiert: 14.3.03] / D. and S. Birks.<br />
In: The general science journal. 2003 =<br />
http://wbabin.net/physics/birks.htm - 5 S.<br />
SRT. RAUM. ZEIT. GLZ. MATH.<br />
Auszug: "In these two statements, Relativists admit to<br />
not being able to assign a co-ordinate system and velocity<br />
vector in relation to intangible or "empty"space;<br />
but, then, somehow, by the assigning of, and comparison<br />
of, "stationary" and "moving" matter, they expect to<br />
establish a stationary co-ordinate system to measure<br />
intangible space and movement in reference to intangible<br />
space. This obvious contradiction has been rationalized<br />
in Relativistic theory by the introduction of time as<br />
simultaneity. Relativists theorize that somehow the<br />
synchronizing of events will give absolute position in<br />
space. They theorize that by comparing two intangibles<br />
(time and space which cannot be independently, tangibly<br />
measured) to each other, somehow they can then<br />
establish, not only a tangible measurement of both time<br />
and space, but, also, the measurement of absolute<br />
(stationary) position and movement of matter and<br />
energy.<br />
The obvious problem with this particular part of<br />
relativistic theory is that simultaneity does not indicate<br />
position. An event can happen simultaneously in London<br />
and New York: Simultaneity does not indicate position<br />
in space.<br />
The relativistic mathematics and theory concerning<br />
simultaneity, are simply another result of the mathematical<br />
virus first created and introduced in the Michelson-<br />
Morley Experiment of 1887. With the incorrect assigning<br />
and use of c and v (hypothetical velocity of light<br />
and the earth in reference to hypothetical aether and<br />
intangible space) as given mathematical values in the<br />
Michelson-Morley Experiment (and subsequent relativistic<br />
equations), Relativists have created and perpetuated<br />
the equivalent of a mathematical virus: A mathematical<br />
wild goose chase, which can be avoided by the<br />
understanding that absolute position and movement<br />
can not, as yet, be measured; and that dynamic comparisons<br />
of energy (light), the earth, rods, clocks, observers,<br />
etc. do not indicate absolute position or movement."<br />
Birks, D. 2003<br />
A mathematical disproof of the equation E = mc ²:<br />
[datiert: 26.3.03] / D. and S. Birks.<br />
In: The general science journal. 2003 =<br />
www.wbabin.net. Ca. 5 S.<br />
SRT. EMC2. MATH. ERK.<br />
"Introduction. - Einstein's equation, E = mc ², and<br />
Lorentz' ratio, 1 : (1- v ²/ c ²)[1/2], bring to light an<br />
issue concerning the use of the exponent that has been<br />
studiously avoided since the 1600's - an issue which<br />
actually invalidates these two equations and, consequently,<br />
invalidates Relativity."<br />
Birks, D. 2003<br />
Without clocks there would still be time: [datiert:<br />
21.4.03] / D. and S. Birks.<br />
In: The general science journal. 2003 =<br />
http://wbabin.net/physics/birks3.htm - 7 S.<br />
SRT. MMV. LICHT. ZEIT.<br />
"Abstract - This article, through an analysis of time<br />
and the mathematical symbols v and c demonstrates<br />
flaws in the logic and mathematics of The Theory of<br />
Relativity. (...)<br />
Taken in this context, the experiment, mathematics,<br />
and the negative or null results of the Michelson-Morley<br />
Experiment exemplify a problem faced throughout the<br />
ages, the same problem faced by Aristotle, Ptolemy,<br />
Galileo, Newton, etc. - the problem of establishment<br />
and measurement of absolute motion, and the search<br />
for an absolute reference. Therefore, the Michelson-<br />
Morley Experiment of 1887, as demonstrated and<br />
exemplified by the definitions of the mathematical<br />
Textversion 1.2 - 2012 73<br />
G. O. Mueller: SRT Kap. 4-Erg..