2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen
Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.
Sokolov, Gennady 2005<br />
The postulates of special relativity (in russ.Sprache)<br />
/ Gennady Sokolov, Vitali Sokolov.<br />
In: The general science journal. 2005 =<br />
http://wbabin.net/sokolov/sokolov3r.pdf - 3 S.<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Sokolov, Gennady 2005<br />
The special theory of relativity can be disproved experimentally:<br />
[datiert: 24.2.05] / Gennady Sokolov, Vitali<br />
Sokolov.<br />
In: The general science journal. 2005 =<br />
http://wbabin.net/sokolov/sokolov.pdf - 34 S.<br />
SRT. C-K. C-U. ARAGO. ABERR.<br />
"Conclusion. - The situation in the modern physics is<br />
alike to the situation in the ancient astronomy when<br />
they thought that the Earth is in the centre of the Universe<br />
and all primary planets and all stars revolve round<br />
the Earth. The Ptolemey's geocentric theory could describe<br />
the movements of the celestial bodies but explained<br />
the reason of such complicated movements wrong. The<br />
special theory of relativity describes most of the optical<br />
phenomena but explains them wrong in principle.<br />
The underlying postulate of the special theory of<br />
relativity states that the speed of light depends neither<br />
on the movement of the source nor on the movement of<br />
the observer measuring this speed. This postulate necessarily<br />
leads to the strange inferences about the time<br />
dilation, the increase of the mass and the length contraction<br />
in the moving frames of reference. In accordance<br />
with this postulate all known phenomena and experiments<br />
(Fizeau, Arago, Michelson and so on) are explained<br />
wrong and the new experiments are not carry<br />
out if they contradict to this postulate.<br />
However the postulate of the invariability of the<br />
light speed is not proved experimentally. The independence<br />
of the speed of light from the movement of the<br />
source is proved convincingly. But no one experiment<br />
on the proof of the dependence of the light speed from<br />
the movement of the observer, except the wrong Arago's<br />
experiment, was carried out. Besides, well known phenomenon<br />
of the star aberration cannot be explained by the<br />
special theory of relativity and obviously contradicts<br />
this theory."<br />
Sokolov, Gennady 2005<br />
The special theory of relativity can be disproved experimentally<br />
(in russ. Sprache) / Gennady Sokolov, Vitali<br />
Sokolov.<br />
In: The general science journal. 2005 =<br />
http://wbabin.net/sokolov/sokolovr.pdf - 42 S.<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
G. O. Mueller: SRT. Kap. 4-Erg.<br />
296<br />
Sokolov, Gennady 2005<br />
Star aberration and the transverse Doppler effect: [datiert:<br />
20.7.05] / Gennady Sokolov, Vitali Sokolov.<br />
In: The General science journal. 2005 =<br />
http://wbabin.net/sokolov/sokolov6.pdf - 6 S.<br />
SRT. DOPPLER. ABERR.<br />
Auszug: "Abstract. - The transverse Doppler effect<br />
and star aberration arise when the source of light or the<br />
observer move in a direction perpendicular to the line,<br />
"source of light - observer". Special relativity considers<br />
the transverse Doppler effect as proof of time dilation<br />
in moving systems. The absence of aberration in the<br />
case when binary stars move cannot be explained by<br />
this theory at all. - It is shown in this article that star<br />
aberration and the transverse Doppler effect have an<br />
identical and simple explanation and both contradict<br />
the special theory of relativity.<br />
It should be stated that special relativity considers<br />
only two situations with transverse movement of the<br />
light source and observer. (...) But there are two other<br />
possible situations with the movement of the light source<br />
and of the observer in a direction perpendicular to the<br />
line, "source of light - observer":<br />
3. The observer moves at speed V in the direction<br />
perpendicular to the line "source of light - observer"<br />
and measures the frequency of the light reaching him<br />
from an immovable source.<br />
4. The source moves at speed V in a direction<br />
perpendicular to the line "source of light - observer"<br />
and the observer measures the angle at which the light<br />
beam approaches from the source.<br />
It is shown below, that both these situations contradict<br />
the special theory of relativity. (...)<br />
Conclusion - Star aberration and the transverse<br />
Doppler effect arise as a result of a vector summation of<br />
the speed of the photons with the speed of the observer<br />
or the source of light. That is, both these effects have<br />
simple kinematic explanations and do not prove that<br />
time dilation takes place in moving systems. Both these<br />
phenomena contradict special relativity and prove its<br />
falsity."<br />
Sokolov, Gennady 2005<br />
Star aberration and the transverse Doppler effect (in<br />
russ. Sprache): [datiert: 20.7.05] / Gennady Sokolov,<br />
Vitali Sokolov.<br />
In: The General science journal. 2005 =<br />
http://wbabin.net/sokolov/sokolov6r.pdf - 7 S.<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Sokolov, Gennady 2005<br />
The theory of relativity and physical reality: [datiert:<br />
4.9.99] / Gennady Sokolov, Vitali Sokolov.<br />
In: The General science journal. 2005 =<br />
http://wbabin.net/sokolov/sokolov8.pdf - 13 S.<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Textversion 1.2 - 2012