2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

first postulate. By its first postulate, it denies in principle,
the possibility of the energy of motion of the local
reference frame affecting the energy of motion of an
object moving physically relative to the former. It then
smuggles in a mathematical principle, which effectively
contradicts the first and negates it. The latter principle
being, that the difference of the squares of time and
space co-ordinates is equal to the square of the 'interval'.
(In the topsy-turvy world of Minkowski this takes the
form of the "pseudo-Pythagoras' theorem" where it
considers the squares of time and space co-ordinates as
components of the square of the 'interval'). However,
the 'interval' is found to be determined by the value of
the relative velocity of the two reference frames under
consideration, which value is nevertheless an invariant
quantity (3, pp. 62-3 ). This invariance is a reflection of
the kinetic energy of the frame relative to which the
motion of the other is measured. Thus by introducing
the 'interval' into the bargain, special relativity surreptitiously
takes account of the energy of motion of what
is considered the 'stationary' reference frame, notwithstanding
what it professes by its first postulate. It is
true that special relativity deals with arbitrary reference
frames, and the invariance of the interval aforementioned
has to be considered as a fictitious mathematical entity
representing a fictitious quantity of kinetic energy,
devoid of any physical content. We contend however,
that in real 'relativistic phenomena', the interval is a
manifestation of kinetic energy of true motion of the
local reference frame. The concept of 'true motion'
referred here is the same as it is defined by Newton in
Principia (4, p.8). (...)
Blind obsession in the principle of relativity under
paradigmal compulsion, by almost all the modern physicists
present and past, has led to an acute obscurantism
that prevents them from recognising even the very
possibility of the energy of a moving object and its
local reference frame constituting a local system in
mechanics, similar to source and sink forming a local
system in thermodynamics. And due to this blind
obsession, the parallel action of kinetic energy losing a
fraction of it, similar to heat energy losing a fraction of
it in the process of transfer, has also been rendered
impossible. Hence there is an inevitable absence of a
physical explanation of 'relativistic phenomena', and
physics turning into mystics as a consequence, in this
area of knowledge.
The Importance of Initial Conditions.
It is by disregarding of an important initial condition
that Galileo's principle has been found justification.
The initial condition that has been disregarded both is
[in] classical theory and relativity is the level of
background energy, (which is the same as the level of
the energy of motion of the local reference frame on
which a physical process of a system occurs). The
effect of background energy on the energy of a physical
process of a system is the subject matter of this paper.
Fernando, Viraj P. L. 2003
What is relativity? : [datiert: 26.9.03] / Viraj P. L.
Fernando.
In: Journal of Theoretics =
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/links/papers/
f-rel.pdf - 6 S. - Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Fernando, Viraj P. L. 2003 ca.
To: All the participants of the Bologna Conference of
1999 / Viraj Fernando.
In: The general science journal. 2003 ca. =
www.wbabin.net/physics/viraj.pdf - 27 S.
Auch unter URL: http://gsjournal.net/physics/viraj.pdf
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Fernando, Viraj P. L. 2009
Relativistic Doppler effect explained classically / Viraj
Fernando.
In: The General science journal. 2009 =
http://wbabin.net/physics/viraj6.pdf - 14 S.
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Field, John H. 1998
Space time measurements in special relativity / J. H.
Field. - [Schweiz]: WWW 1998. 33 S.
(University of Geneva preprint UGVA-DPNC 1998/
04-176.)
URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/9902048v1.
SRT. LK. ZD. ERK.
S. 1-2: "The purpose of this paper is to point out that
the t = constant projection of the LFC and the x' =
constant projection of TD are not the only physically
distinct Space Time Measurements (STM) possible
within Special Relativity. In fact, as will be demonstrated
below, there are two others: Space Dilatation
(SD), the t' = constant projection and Time Contraction
(TC), the x = constant projection."
S. 31: "Einstein's great achievement in his first
paper on Special Relativity [1] was, for the first time, to
clearly disentangle in Classical Electromagnetism, the
purely geometrical and kinematical effects embodied
in the Lorentz Transformation from dynamics. In spite
of this, papers still appear from time to time in the
literature claiming that moving objects 'really' contract
[6] or that moving clocks 'really' run slow [7] for
dynamical reasons, or even that such dynamical effects
are the true basis of Special Relativity and should be
taught as such [8]. As it has been shown above that a
moving object can apparently shrink or expand, and
identical moving clocks can apparently run fast or slow,
depending only on how they are observed, it is clear
that they cannot 'really' shrink, or run slow, respectively.
If a moving object actually shrinks for dynamical reasons
it is hard to see how the same object, viewed in a diffe-
Textversion 1.2 - 2012 121
G. O. Mueller: SRT Kap. 4-Erg..