30.11.2012 Aufrufe

2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

emaining unresolved issue in regard to this matter is<br />

that involving acceptance of this evidence by the scientific<br />

community. As the author has stated in the past,<br />

this evidence will not go away. Let it also be understood<br />

that the author is not requesting such corroboration in<br />

order to see if the presented evidence is correct. The<br />

author knows it is correct. Perhaps the scientific community<br />

needs to be reminded of its responsibility to society.<br />

If Einstein's theory is wrong, the tax paying public who<br />

ultimately funds most of the research that is conducted<br />

in the U.S. has a right to know about it. And what about<br />

our children and grandchildren in the universities? Are<br />

we going to, for political reasons, or out of just plain<br />

stubbornness, continue teaching them something that<br />

we know is wrong? How does this benefit the advancement<br />

of science in the U.S., and what does this portend<br />

for America's future position in the highly competitive<br />

world of science?"<br />

Rybczyk, Joseph A. 2004<br />

Velocity composition the scientific establishment's way:<br />

[datiert: 15.11.04] / Joseph A. Rybczyk.<br />

In: The general science journal. 2004 =<br />

http://wbabin.net/jr/vcomp.pdf - 6 S.<br />

SRT. LK. ZD. V-ADD.<br />

"Abstract - A satirical attempt at performing velocity<br />

composition using the approved and verified methods<br />

of the scientific establishment. (...)<br />

Conclusion<br />

Careful analysis of the principles used in these examples<br />

will show that the special relativity formula for velocity<br />

composition cannot be correct, and in fact violates the<br />

2nd postulate of special relativity. At the same time it<br />

will be seen that the millennium relativity formula for<br />

velocity composition is in perfect harmony with all of<br />

the evidence supported principles of relativity. But<br />

then again, no matter how convinced you become that<br />

the author is correct here, remind yourself that the<br />

author's results are in disagreement with the beliefs of<br />

the scientific establishment. If you want to be accepted<br />

by the scientific establishment as truly understanding<br />

relativistic physics, you must reject what was shown<br />

here in the strongest terms possible and keep analyzing<br />

the application of special relativity velocity composition<br />

until you convince yourself that Einstein's formula is<br />

correct. Only then will you find full acceptance among<br />

the scientific intelligentsia of the academic and institutional<br />

establishments and be able to join their ranks<br />

in condemning and ridiculing the findings of lesser<br />

individuals such as the author of this work.<br />

Disclaimer - The author accepts no responsibility<br />

for scrambling the minds of those who are foolish<br />

enough to think he may be right. Those who accept the<br />

challenge presented above, do so at their own risk. To<br />

have your minds scrambled even more, try visiting the<br />

millennium relativity web site at<br />

http://www.mrelativity.net"<br />

G. O. Mueller: SRT. Kap. 4-Erg.<br />

274<br />

Rybicki, Maciej 2005<br />

Transformation of work contradicts the relativity principle<br />

/ Maciej Rybicki.<br />

In: The General science journal. 2005 =<br />

http://wbabin.net/science/rybicki.pdf - 2 S.<br />

SRT. RP. ARBEIT.<br />

"Abstract. - Considering the transformation of work<br />

from the system in motion into the system at rest (the<br />

observer's frame), we show that dynamical anticipations<br />

of Lorentz transformation lead to a contradiction. We<br />

conclude that the relativity principle is not physically<br />

adequate, and therefore, an alternative for special relativity<br />

is required."<br />

Rybicki, Maciej 2007<br />

How to distinguish acceleration from gravity?.<br />

In: Physics essays. 20. 2007, No. 4.<br />

Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Rybicki 2008 (Critical<br />

analysis).<br />

Rybicki, Maciej 2007<br />

Length contraction on rotating disc: an argument for<br />

the Lorentzian approach to relativity / Maciej Rybicki.<br />

In: Apeiron. 14. 2007, No. 4, Oct., S. 454-463 =<br />

http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V14NO4PDF/<br />

V14N4RYB.pdf - 10 S.<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Rybicki, Maciej 2007<br />

Transformation of work reveals the incoherence of SRT /<br />

Maciej Rybicki.<br />

In: Galilean electrodynamics. 18. 2007, Special<br />

issue Nr. 1, S. 14.<br />

Status: Vgl. Ausgabe 2005. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Rybicki, Maciej 2008<br />

Critical analysis of special relativity in reference to<br />

energy transformation / Maciej Rybicki.<br />

In: Apeiron. 15. 2008, No. 3, July, S. 270-293 =<br />

http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V15NO3PDF/<br />

V15N3RYB.pdf - 24 S.<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Rybicki, Maciej 2010<br />

The energy paradox: cosmic "perpetuum mobile" /<br />

Maciej Rybicki.<br />

In: Galilean electrodynamics. 21. 2010, Special<br />

issue Nr. 1, S. 11-12.<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Textversion 1.2 - 2012

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!