2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.
YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.
emaining unresolved issue in regard to this matter is<br />
that involving acceptance of this evidence by the scientific<br />
community. As the author has stated in the past,<br />
this evidence will not go away. Let it also be understood<br />
that the author is not requesting such corroboration in<br />
order to see if the presented evidence is correct. The<br />
author knows it is correct. Perhaps the scientific community<br />
needs to be reminded of its responsibility to society.<br />
If Einstein's theory is wrong, the tax paying public who<br />
ultimately funds most of the research that is conducted<br />
in the U.S. has a right to know about it. And what about<br />
our children and grandchildren in the universities? Are<br />
we going to, for political reasons, or out of just plain<br />
stubbornness, continue teaching them something that<br />
we know is wrong? How does this benefit the advancement<br />
of science in the U.S., and what does this portend<br />
for America's future position in the highly competitive<br />
world of science?"<br />
Rybczyk, Joseph A. 2004<br />
Velocity composition the scientific establishment's way:<br />
[datiert: 15.11.04] / Joseph A. Rybczyk.<br />
In: The general science journal. 2004 =<br />
http://wbabin.net/jr/vcomp.pdf - 6 S.<br />
SRT. LK. ZD. V-ADD.<br />
"Abstract - A satirical attempt at performing velocity<br />
composition using the approved and verified methods<br />
of the scientific establishment. (...)<br />
Conclusion<br />
Careful analysis of the principles used in these examples<br />
will show that the special relativity formula for velocity<br />
composition cannot be correct, and in fact violates the<br />
2nd postulate of special relativity. At the same time it<br />
will be seen that the millennium relativity formula for<br />
velocity composition is in perfect harmony with all of<br />
the evidence supported principles of relativity. But<br />
then again, no matter how convinced you become that<br />
the author is correct here, remind yourself that the<br />
author's results are in disagreement with the beliefs of<br />
the scientific establishment. If you want to be accepted<br />
by the scientific establishment as truly understanding<br />
relativistic physics, you must reject what was shown<br />
here in the strongest terms possible and keep analyzing<br />
the application of special relativity velocity composition<br />
until you convince yourself that Einstein's formula is<br />
correct. Only then will you find full acceptance among<br />
the scientific intelligentsia of the academic and institutional<br />
establishments and be able to join their ranks<br />
in condemning and ridiculing the findings of lesser<br />
individuals such as the author of this work.<br />
Disclaimer - The author accepts no responsibility<br />
for scrambling the minds of those who are foolish<br />
enough to think he may be right. Those who accept the<br />
challenge presented above, do so at their own risk. To<br />
have your minds scrambled even more, try visiting the<br />
millennium relativity web site at<br />
http://www.mrelativity.net"<br />
G. O. Mueller: SRT. Kap. 4-Erg.<br />
274<br />
Rybicki, Maciej 2005<br />
Transformation of work contradicts the relativity principle<br />
/ Maciej Rybicki.<br />
In: The General science journal. 2005 =<br />
http://wbabin.net/science/rybicki.pdf - 2 S.<br />
SRT. RP. ARBEIT.<br />
"Abstract. - Considering the transformation of work<br />
from the system in motion into the system at rest (the<br />
observer's frame), we show that dynamical anticipations<br />
of Lorentz transformation lead to a contradiction. We<br />
conclude that the relativity principle is not physically<br />
adequate, and therefore, an alternative for special relativity<br />
is required."<br />
Rybicki, Maciej 2007<br />
How to distinguish acceleration from gravity?.<br />
In: Physics essays. 20. 2007, No. 4.<br />
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Rybicki 2008 (Critical<br />
analysis).<br />
Rybicki, Maciej 2007<br />
Length contraction on rotating disc: an argument for<br />
the Lorentzian approach to relativity / Maciej Rybicki.<br />
In: Apeiron. 14. 2007, No. 4, Oct., S. 454-463 =<br />
http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V14NO4PDF/<br />
V14N4RYB.pdf - 10 S.<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Rybicki, Maciej 2007<br />
Transformation of work reveals the incoherence of SRT /<br />
Maciej Rybicki.<br />
In: Galilean electrodynamics. 18. 2007, Special<br />
issue Nr. 1, S. 14.<br />
Status: Vgl. Ausgabe 2005. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Rybicki, Maciej 2008<br />
Critical analysis of special relativity in reference to<br />
energy transformation / Maciej Rybicki.<br />
In: Apeiron. 15. 2008, No. 3, July, S. 270-293 =<br />
http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V15NO3PDF/<br />
V15N3RYB.pdf - 24 S.<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Rybicki, Maciej 2010<br />
The energy paradox: cosmic "perpetuum mobile" /<br />
Maciej Rybicki.<br />
In: Galilean electrodynamics. 21. 2010, Special<br />
issue Nr. 1, S. 11-12.<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Textversion 1.2 - 2012