2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

in favor of the standard relativistic interpretation of
classical electrodynamics and physicists that favor an
approach to electrodynamics based on coordinate
transformations different from the Lorentz transformations
and, thus, negate the validity of special relativity.
[...]
Before going into the details, we would like to
make a general comment on the reliability of the papers
that deal with this type of conflicting aspects of fundaments
of physics. As it has been remarked by several
epistemologists and experts in the philosophy of science,
most physicists assume spontaneously a partial position
in these discussions. The remark is that some experimentalists
are tempted to, and in fact do, try to arrange
the experimental set up in such a way that the data are
trimmed or slightly modified in favor of expected or
desired results, which would corroborate their own
visions or theories. Moreover, it is not uncommon to
find out that theoreticians may have selected from the
existing theory formulas or partial approaches that lead
to a theoretical result in agreement with their vision,
most of the times neglecting "unintentionally" other
formulas or approaches that would lead to opposite or
different results." [...]
Some physicists, either in favor the official, standard
view of accepted theories or not, assume generally a
rigid and dogmatic attitude that often prevents discussion
and advances. Sometimes this attitude prevents the
research of issues that later are recognized as real fundamental
unsolved problems of modern physics."
Spears, Michael 2010
Time, dark matter and Einstein's greatest mistake /
Michael Spears.
In: The General science journal. 2010 =
http://wbabin.net/ntham/spears4.pdf - 6 S.
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Spolter, Pari 1996
Gravitational force of the sun / Pari Spolter.
In: Galilean electrodynamics. 7. 1996, Nr. 6, S.
118-119.
Stellungnahme zu Haydens Rezension: Nr. 3, S. 60.
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Squires, Euan J. 1992
Explicit collapse & superluminal signals / Euan J.
Squires.
In: Physics letters. A. 163. 1992, S. 356-358.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Millenium Twain 1995 (The
undiscovered physics).
G. O. Mueller: SRT. Kap. 4-Erg.
300
Stafford, Richard D. 2002
Resolution of the relativity/quantum mechanics conflict
/ Richard D. Stafford. - [Land?]: WWW 2002. 10 S.
URL: http://home.jam.rr.com/dicksfiles/flaw/
Fatalfla.htm - Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Stamper, F. Harrison 1956
A criticism of the Einstein theory of relativity / F. Harrison
Stamper. - Los Angeles: [Selbstverlag] 1956. 5
Bl. - Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Auburn Univ. Libraries;
URL http://aubiecat.auburn.edu
Stanton, Tony 2007
Time dilation between frames inside and outside gravitational
fields: True Relativity [Part II] / Tony Stanton.
In: The General science journal. 2007 =
http://wbabin.net/science/stanton7.pdf - 3 S.
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Stanton, Tony 2007
True relativity [Part I]: a theory of three dimensional
spacetime [datiert: 28.2.07] / Tony Stanton.
In: The General science journal. 2007 =
http://wbabin.net/science/stanton8.pdf - 7 S.
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Stavinsky, Ilya 2000
Flaws in the logic of Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity
/ Ilya Stavinsky. - [Russland]: WWW 2000.
In: Philosophical researches. Moscow. 2000, #4,
12/2000. 4 S.
URL: http://mars.superlink.net/~dialect/theory.html
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Steinberg, Aephraim M. 1993
Measurement of the single photon tunneling time /
A. M. Steinberg, P. G. Kwiat, R. Y. Chiao.
In: Physical review letters. 71. 1993, S. 708-711.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Maiorino 1999 (Faster
than light).
Stejnmann, R. Ja. 1952
Sa materialistskuju teoriju bystrych dwishenij: [Übers.:
Für eine materialistische Theorie schneller Bewegungen]
/ R. Ja. Schtejnman.
In: Filosofskije woprossy sowremennoj fisiki [Philosophische
Fragen der neuzeitlichen Physik]. Red.:
A. A. Maksimow, I. W. Kusnezow, Ja. P. Terlezkij
(u.a.) Inst. f. Philos. d. Akad. d. Wiss. d. UdSSR, Moskau.
1952. 576 S.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Buchholz, Arnold: Ideologie
und Forschung in der sowjetischen Naturwissenschaft.
Stuttgart 1953.
Textversion 1.2 - 2012