2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Sokolov, Gennady 2005
Fizeau's experiment with moving water: new explanation
[datiert: 17.6.05] / Gennady Sokolov, Vitali
Sokolov.
In: The general science journal. 2005 =
http://www.wbabin.net/sokolov/sokolov4.pdf - 8 S.
SRT. FIZEAU.
Auszüge: "In this article it is shown that Fizeau made a
mistake when he supposed that the fringe shift in his
interferometer with moving water is determined, as it
takes place in usual interferometers, by expression (1)
that is, the fringe shift depends on the difference [Formel]
only. It is shown in the article that expression (1)
is wrong because it is derived under the condition that
the interfering beams entering the moving water do not
change the frequency and go in the water with identical
frequency 0 n ."
"Thus, in consequence of the interaction with moving
re-radiator the light decreases its frequency. The frequency
decreases in both cases: when the re-radiator
moves in the direction of the light beam and when it
moves in opposite direction. This decrease of frequency
evidently contradicts special relativity and nowadays
this effect can be easy proved by a simple laser experiment
with the movement of the glass re-radiator at a
speed of 100-150 mph or more."
Schluß: "Fizeau's experiment is unfit for the measuring
of the speed of light in moving media and cannot
be considered a confirmation of the main postulate of
special relativity. On the contrary, this experiment proves
the falsity of that postulate."
Sokolov, Gennady 2005
Fizeau's interference experiment with moving water
contradicts the special theory of relativity: [datiert:
11.3.05] / Gennady Sokolov, Vitali Sokolov.
In: The general science journal. 2005 =
http://gsjournal.net/eeuro/sokolov2.pdf - 9 S.
SRT. FIZEAU.
"Conclusion - The usual explanation of the results of
Fizeau's interference experiment with moving water is
wrong in principle. The fact that the fringe shift in the
experiments always is less than the shift determined by
expression (2) does not prove that the speed of the light
changes less than by V. Expression (2) gives the wrong
value of the fringe shift because this expression was
derived without regard for the influence of the frequency
change of the interfering beams on the fringe shift. (...)
Fizeau's experiment is unfit for the measuring of the
speed of the light in a moving media and cannot be
considered as the confirmation of the main postulate of
the special theory of relativity. This experiment, on the
contrary, proves the falsity of that postulate."
Sokolov, Gennady 2005
Fizeau's interference experiment with moving water
contradicts the special theory of relativity (in russ.
Sprache) / Gennady Sokolov, Vitali Sokolov.
In: The General science journal. 2005 =
http://wbabin.net/sokolov/sokolov2r.pdf - 12 S.
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Sokolov, Gennady 2005
The postulates of special relativity: [datiert: 19.3.05]
/ Gennady Sokolov, Vitali Sokolov.
In: The general science journal. 2005 =
http://wbabin.net/sokolov/sokolov3.pdf - 3 S.
SRT. RP. ABERR.
Auszüge: "However, as Galileo warned, the principle
of relativity means that only the observations and the
experiments carried out inside the inertial frame do not
allow detection of the movement of the frame. If you
go on deck of the ship, said Galileo, you will see that
your ship moves relative to shore, relative to the air,
relative to the water, and so on. The observation of the
external light signals coming from other frames allow
detection the movement of own inertial frame relative
to those frames. There is no equivalence of the movements
of the light source and the observer because the
observer receives external signals. Receiving the light
signals from the different inertial frames, the observer
can detect his own movement relative to those frames
and some observations already prove that. The aberration
of light coming from the stars, allows determining the
speed of orbital motion of the Earth. This fact contradicts
Einstein's postulate of relativity. The observation of socalled
relict radiation allows determining the direction
and the speed of the movement of the Earth relative to
the stars. Stellar aberration takes place when the observer
moves (this has been known about 300 years), but does
not take place when the light source moves (this is
proven by the observations of double star systems which
has been known about 70 years). This fact convincingly
proves that the movement of the observer is not equivalent
to the movement of the source of light."
(...)
"In order to prove the falsity of the special theory of
relativity it is necessary to carry out the experiments
proving that the speed of the light depends on the
movement of the observer and that in the case when the
observer moves toward the light beam he meets the
photons with more speed than in the case when he
moves in the opposite direction. At first it is necessary
to carry out a simple orbital experiment in which the
observer will measure the speed of the light coming to
him from some bright star or from a laser located on
another spaceship. This experiment will exert more
influence on developments in science than Michelson's
experiment did in its time."
Textversion 1.2 - 2012 295
G. O. Mueller: SRT Kap. 4-Erg..