2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

aber offiziell nicht beachteten Experimente mit explodierenden
Stromleitern beweisen die Richtigkeit des
Ampèreschen Kraft-Gesetzes und gehören zu den Kandidaten
von Experimenten, deren Wiederholung und
öffentliche Erklärung von der akademischen Physik
dringend gefordert werden müssen, um die Wissenschaft
aus ihrem dogmatischen Tiefschlaf aufzuwecken,
den unser neuer "Kopernikus-Galilei-Newton" und seine
Nachbeter ihr seit 1922 verordnet hatten.
Graneau, Peter 1999
Reconciliation of Newton with Mach / Peter Graneau.
In: Instantaneous action at a distance in modern
physics: pro and contra. Ed.: A. E. Chubykalo, N. V.
Pope, R. Smirnov-Rueda. Commack, NY. 1999, S.
75-89.
NEWTON. GRAVIT. FERNW. MACH. HIS.
Beabsichtigt eine Verbindung der Mechanik von Newton
mit Machs Prinzip herzustellen (S. 75): "This essay
proposes amendments to Newton's second and third
laws of motion. The amended laws permit the formulation
of a truly Machian theory of inertia in which the
three forces of inertia, "opposition to free fall, centrifugal,
and Coriolis", have distributed reaction forces in
the distant universe. This can only be achieved with
simultaneous far-actions." Mit einem Nachweis der
instantanen Fernwirkung wird eine Behauptung der SRT
widerlegt. Die Annahme der Fernwirkung stammt bereits
von Newton (S. 81):
"... for gravitation Newton, for the first time, made
the bold assumption that an interaction force could
span any distance. All the astronomical evidence at our
disposal suggests that this is true. To proclaim that
gravitational attractions were truly universal and reached
the furthest corners of the cosmos was a most courageous
contention coming, as it did, after the two thousand
year reign of Aristotle's contact action dogma."
Newton hat sein Gravitationsgesetz in den "Principia"
nicht genau definiert, aber seine verschiedenen
Äußerungen und Berechnungen erlauben folgende Zusammenfassung
(S. 81-82):
"Newton's Universal law of gravitation:
Every particle of matter attracts every other particle of
matter with a force varying directly as the product of
their masses and inversely as the square of the distance
between them.
It must be remembered that 'attraction' always stands
for a simultaneous interaction between a pair of two
particles. It is defined by Newton's third law. The philosophical
arguments and the experimental facts which
support simultaneous far-actions at the end of the
twentieth century have been more fully discussed in a
book [11: P. Graneau, N. Graneau: Newton versus Einstein.
New York 1993]."
G. O. Mueller: SRT. Kap. 4-Erg.
136
Graudis, Raymond 2004
Gravity and inertia: redefined as the consequence of
the centrality of matter within the Higgs energy field
[datiert: 14.4.04] / Raymond Graudis.
In: The general science journal. 2004 =
http://gsjournal.net/physics/graudis.pdf - 6 S.
SRT. V-ADD. Dingle.
S. 4-5: "The best known, and still often proffered evidence
for the constancy of light speed, was the argument
made by de Sitter in 1913. He concluded that light
received on earth from a double-star system would be
hopelessly confused if light speed could vary throughout
its long journey earthward. The error in de Sitter's reasoning
is convincingly disclosed by Herbert Dingle in
his Science at the Crossroads, London (Martin Brian &
O'keefee 1972) p.205. More Recently, Robert Fritzius,
making use of research done by V. I. Sekerin in 1987,
argues that the periodic light variation of Cepheid variable
stars may be caused by a variable speed of light
(VSL), by which he means 'the addition of velocities'.
This is something quite different from the idea proposed
by Joao Magueijo and John Moffat. [...]
Dimitri Nanopoulos, Texas A&M University, 2001,
along with Nikolaos Mavromatos of King's College in
London, and John Ellis of CERN in Geneva has discovered
that measurements made over cosmic distances
show a correlation between light speed and frequency.
"The speed of light is frequency-dependent." Though
he does not infer (c + v) for light speed from his
observations, such a correlation is necessary to the (c +
v) model. [...]
In 1969, Brian G. Wallace published his analysis of
the first Venus radar contact data, and determined that
the best fit to the data was a (c + v) model. His difficulties
in promulgating his findings make for lively reading."
Gregori, Giovanni P. 2010
On the Pioneer anomaly and the Doppler effect / Giovanni
P. Gregori.
In: Galilean electrodynamics. 21. 2010, Nr. 3, S.
43-52. - Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Gruffat, Jean-Jacques 1999
Criticism on the foundations of relativity / Jean-
Jacques Gruffat.
In: La scienza e i vortici del dubbio. Proceedings
of the International Conference "Cartesio e la scienza",
Università di Perugia, 1996. Napoli 1999. S. 315-
323. -Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Grumel, Joseph 2004
Critique des équations de Lorentz et de la relativité
/ Abbé Joseph Grumel. - [Frankreich]: WWW 2004.
23 S.
Textversion 1.2 - 2012