2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Thompson, Caroline H. 2004
Forgotten history / Caroline Thompson. - [United Kingdom]:
WWW 2004. 11 S.
URL: http://freespace.virgin.net/ch.thompson1/
History/forgotten.htm - Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Thornhill, Charles Kenneth 1996
Real or imaginary space-time? Reality or relativity? /
C. K. Thornhill.
In: Hadronic journal. 11. 1996, Nr. 3, S. 209-224.
Auch unter: http://www.etherphysics.net/CKT4.pdf.
SRT. MAXWELL. AET. RAUM-ZEIT.
"Abstract. - The real space-time of Newtonian mechanics
and the ether concept is contrasted with the imaginary
space-time of the non-ether concept and relativity. In
real space-time (x, y, z, ct) characteristic theory shows
that Maxwell's equations and sound waves in any uniform
fluid at rest have identical wave surfaces. Moreover,
without charge or current, Maxwell's equations
reduce to the same standard wave equation which governs
such sound waves. This is not a general and invariant
equation but it becomes so by Galilean transformation
to any other reference-frame. So also do Maxwell's
equations which are, likewise, not general but
unique to one reference-frame. The mistake of believing
that Maxwell's equations were invariant led to the
Lorentz transformation and to relativity; and to the
misinterpretation of the differential equation for the
wave cone through any point as the quadratic dierential
form of a Riemannian metric in imaginary space-time
(x, y, z, ict). Mathematics is then required to tolerate
the same equation being transformed in different ways
for different applications. Otherwise, relativity is
untenable and recourse must then be made to real spacetime,
normal Galilean transformation and an ether with
Maxwellian statistics and Planck's energy distribution."
Thornhill, Charles Kenneth 2004
The foundations of relativity / C. K. Thornhill. - [England]:
WWW 2004. 9 S.
http://www.etherphysics.net/CKT7.pdf
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Tiapkin, Alexei A. 1973
On the impossibility of the first-order relativity test.
In: Lettere al Nuovo cimento. 7. 1973, Nr. 15, S.
760-764.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Barone 2002 (Ritardo).
Tieman, Robert D. 2002
The isotropic nature of time: [datiert: 19.10.02] / Robert
D. Tieman.
In: The general science journal. 2002 =
http://wbabin.net/tieman/iso.htm - 16 S.
SRT. RP. ZEIT. LICHT. MMV.
"6 - Philosophical Implications Of The Principle Of
Relativity
The principle of relativity for the measuring inertial
system is based on the fact that if an inertial system k' is
moving with velocity v relative to a system k considered
to be at rest, a slowing of a clock in k' will incur. How
can the system k' have its' clock slowed if both systems
are equivalent? There must be a regulating medium
which regulates the speed of light. This shows that
there is an absolute distinction between inertial frames
even though one cannot be readily measured by the
reference frames themselves. Otherwise, both systems
clocks would slow when one of them traveled at velocity
v. Clearly, this is ridiculous. There must be something
that determines which systems' clock is slowed. This is
the same thing that regulates the speed of light. There
must be a master frame of reference to which all motion
is checked, which is classically called the absolute reference
frame or ether. This is the only concept that supports
the second postulate of the constancy of the measured
velocity of light."
Tieman, Robert D. 2003
The special case of relativity: [datiert: 14.12.03] /
Robert D. Tieman.
In: The general science journal. 2003 =
http://wbabin.net/tieman2/tieman.htm - 26 S.
SRT. LORTF. ZEIT. MMV.
"Preface. - The following is based on my paper 'The
Isotropic Nature Of Time'. Misunderstanding of my
methods and results lead me to this paper, a step by step
analysis of Dr. Einstein's Special Theory Of Relativity
that anyone with a high school physics equivalent background
can follow.
I will show that the postulates of relativity are too
general in definition, an attempt to totally abolish any
ether concept. I will show the assumption that an object's
length is the same parallel and opposite the velocity
vector of an object's motion is erroneous. I will show
that the Lorentz Transformations were derived specifically
tailored to electromagnetic events, making them
electromagnetic transformations. I will show how to
derive the transformations based on methods which
support actual observation. More importantly, I will
describe an experiment that is as fundamental as the
Michelson-Morley and Kennedy-Thorndike experiments.
This experiment will force a review of special
relativity no matter what its outcome.
I start by showing a historical background behind
the principles which led up to the special theory of relativity.
I will then show the importance of the Michelson-
Morley experiment that was not realized before. Next, I
will analyze Einstein's principle of relativity of which
he ascribes as an absolute property by introducing the
relation x'²-c²t'² = x²-c²t². This is his attempt to totally
Textversion 1.2 - 2012 307
G. O. Mueller: SRT Kap. 4-Erg..