2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

abolish any ether concept by making all inertial frames
equal on all footings. Then I will show the proper derivation
of the Lorentz Transformations (Revised Lorentz
Transformations) which conform to the basic properties
of motion in space and time which is observed in the
physical world. I will show that the difference between
the Revised Lorentz Transformations and the original
Lorentz Transformations is that by using the electromagnetic
relations x' = ct' and x = ct in the Revised
Lorentz Transformations, simplification will give the
original Lorentz Transformations showing them to be
electromagnetic transformations. Next, I will show that
even the Revised Lorentz Transformations cannot completely
fulfill the requirements of Einstein's principle
of relativity (in the absolute sense) by introducing a
paradox which can only be resolved by making time
intervals change isotropically with motion. Then I will
describe an experiment which can have only 2 outcomes;
an absolute motion detector (absolute speedometer) or
time changes isotropically with motion. Having faith
in Galileo's principle of relativity, I will show the derivation
of the new Transformations based on the isotropic
nature of time which conform to the basic properties of
motion in space and time which is observed in the physical
world. Next, I will discuss the philosophical implications
of Galileo's principle of relativity with examples
that show the true nature of the principle of relativity. I
will then show how the relativity of length can be explained
using the concepts discovered by Louis
DeBroglie and Christian Doppler."
Tieman, Robert D. 2005
Electromagnetic origin of Lorentz-Fitzgerald transforms
/ Robert Tieman.
In: The General science journal. 2005 =
http://wbabin.net/tieman/tieman4.pdf - 21 S.
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Tieman, Robert D. 2005
The plain truth about relativity: excerpts from "Einstein's
solution: 99 years and change" [datiert: 9.4.05]
/ Robert D. Tieman.
In: The general science journal. 2005 =
http://wbabin.net/tieman3/tieman3.htm - 11 S.
SRT. MMV.
Auszüge: "This analysis pertains to the verification of
the Fitzgerald-Lorentz Transformations as accepted by
the modern day physics community as pertaining to
Albert Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity (STR). I
have broken this treatment down to as simple an explanation
as I could possibly give to the layman. The same
principles that allowed STR to flourish are hereby analyzed
for completeness/accuracy as pertains to what is
actually observed/measured in the physical world. I
invite anyone to find fault in the proceeding (good
luck, you'll need it!). Anyone who rejects the Michelson-
G. O. Mueller: SRT. Kap. 4-Erg.
308
Morley experiment as a valid experiment need not read
further. The end result lies in an interferometer experiment
(modified Michelson-Morley type) devised to
indirectly measure the one-way speed of light by means
of the time required by light to complete the experimental
paths. I will begin by covering all arguable
parameters of the experiment in order to verify that its
outcome is truly as I predict. No matter what the interpretation
of the arguable aspects, this experiment can
only have 2 outcomes; neither of which conforms to
the currently accepted temporal equation/s of STR. The
experiment guarantees disproof of the temporal equation/
s of STR. The analysis of the arguable parameters merely
allows derivation of what the fundamental properties of
length and time become in an inertial frame. We will
progress by analyzing the properties of physics prior to
STR followed by those observations/measurements
which led up to the Michelson-Morley experiment."
Schluß: "This shows that the assumption (for the
lengths parallel and opposite the velocity vector) made
by Fitzgerald, Lorentz, and Einstein is invalid in this
new light. These are the results of this 3-stage experiment
which is fully explained in my book. This experiment
could have been performed in 1887 just as easily as the
Michelson-Morley experiment. The two experiments
are basically identical, differing only in geometry. The
only problem lies in getting the experiment performed
today! The only 2 possible outcomes are as follows;
1) Interference is measured. We now have an
absolute motion detector which demands a re-evaluation
of STR.
2) Interference is not measured. Time is isotropic
which demands a re-evaluation STR."
Tingay, S. J. 1995
Relativistic motion in a nearby bright X-ray source /
S. J. Tingay (u. a.).
In: Nature. London. 374. 1995, S. 141.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Recami 2002 (Esperimenti
super-luminali).
Tirala, Lothar Gottlieb 1968
Die Einsteinsche Relativitätstheorie [Teil 2].
In: Deutsche Hochschullehrer-Zeitung. Tübingen.
16. 1968, H. 1, S. 11-20.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: IBZ 5,2, S. 67-68.
Tiwari, S. C. 1988
Fresh look on relativistic time and lifetime of an unstable
particle.
In: Int. Conference on Physical Interpretation of
Relativity Theory (PIRT), London 1. 1988. BSPS,
Imperial College. Proceedings. 1988.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Apeiron. 15. 1993, S. 23.
Textversion 1.2 - 2012