2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Unzicker, Alexander 2005
Mach's principle and a variable speed of light / A. Unzicker.
- [Deutschland]: WWW 2005. 13 S.
URL: http://www.alexander-unzicker.de/
GravNablaC.pdf - Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Unzicker, Alexander 2010
Vom Urknall zum Durchknall: die absurde Jagd nach
der Weltformel / Alexander Unzicker. - Berlin: Springer
2010. 330 S.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Spektrum der Wiss. 2010,
Aug., S. 100.
Valdivia, Rafael de 1947
Algunas dificultades en la teoría de la relatividad /
Rafael de Valdivia.
In: Ibérica. 1947, Nr. 123, II, p. 264-268.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Soler Ferran 2009 (Teoria).
Valev, Pentcho 2004
Science infected with inconsistency: [datiert: 27.5.04]
/ Pentcho Valev.
In: The general science journal. 2004 =
http://www.wbabin.net/valev/valev.pdf - 7 S.
SRT. ERK.
"Abstract - A theory can be regarded, in the abstract, as a
set of propositions. If there are circumstances, either
realistic or unrealistic, under which all the propositions in
the set are true, the theory is consistent. If there are no
such circumstances - e.g. the set contains the propositions
"Henry is married" and "Henry is not married" -
the theory can be called an inconsistency. An inconsistent
theory is extremely dangerous since, somewhat
paradoxically, it may possess a great deductive power
and produce breathtaking conclusions. Moreover, if it
occupies scientists' minds for a long time, reasoning in
terms of inconsistent propositions becomes "normal",
the logical procedure reductio ad absurdum stops working
and returning to a consistent conceptual framework
proves impossible in the end. Special relativity and
thermodynamics are perhaps the most successful inconsistencies
ever created."
Valev, Pentcho 2005
Albert Einstein: the lucky jugler: [datiert: 12.4.05] /
Pentcho Valev.
In: The general science journal. 2005 =
http://wbabin.net/valev/valev6.pdf - 2 S.
SRT. ERK.
Auszug: "In an oversimplified presentation, the method
Einstein used in the creation of his theory of relativity
can be reduced to the following simple rules:
G. O. Mueller: SRT. Kap. 4-Erg.
312
1. Introduce a false axiom (the postulate of constancy
of the speed of light).
2. Draw on all the miracles (time dilation, length
contraction, conversion of time into space, conversion
of space into time etc.) the false axiom produces and
become god-like.
3. In the capacity of a god, do all necessary tricks so
as to hide all dangerous inconsistencies generated by
the false axiom."
Valev, Pentcho 2005
Incommensurability of Newton and Einstein: [datiert:
22.5.05] / Pentcho Valev.
In: The general science journal. 2005 =
http://wbabin.net/valev/valev7.pdf - 1 S.
SRT. NEWTON. ERK.
Auszüge: "One of the most striking claims advanced
by T. Kuhn and P. Feyerabend, both classified as nonrationalists
among philosophers of science, is that Newtonian
mechanics and Einsteinian mechanics neither
contradict nor agree with one another; they are just
incommensurable. This means that in the transition
from one to the other there has been a shift in meaning
so extreme that the assertions of two respective proponents
would simply pass one another by without any
collision leading to either agreement or conflict. If the
Newtonian says, for instance, "The ball will fall in the
hole if its diameter is smaller", no reply by the Einsteinian
can be construed as compatible or incompatible;
the two persons are merely equivocating. [...]
Clearly, Kuhn and Feyerabend are right about incommensurability
(although their arguments are different
from mine). In Newtonian mechanics assertions are
straightforward. In Einsteinian mechanics assertions are
accompanied by their negations. Proponents of the two
theories can neither agree nor disagree - they can only
equivocate."
Valev, Pentcho 2005
Relativity: the madness of 20th century physics: [datiert:
5.3.05] / Pentcho Valev.
In: The general science journal. 2005 =
http://wbabin.net/valev/valev3.pdf - 4 S.
SRT. LORTF. ZD. LK. EHRENFEST. ERK. HIST. SOZIO.
Auszug: "In his book "The Tragicomical History of
Thermodynamics 1822-1854" C. Truesdell characterises
this science as "a prime example to show that physicists
are not exempt from the madness of crowds". Since
thermodynamics can be defined as a 19th century
science, Truesdell could have called it, accordingly,
"the 19th century prime example". However the logical
paradigm set out by 19th century thermodynamicists
has developed so that the 20th century "prime example"
is undoubtedly relativity. The present paper contains a
malicious scenario presenting the main protagonist, Al-
Textversion 1.2 - 2012