2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

mathematics and all the steps are proved, and even if
some predictions are correct, because the originating
mathematical models omitting these interactions are
contained in elaborations or abstractions of the theory.
In this case errors are much more difficult to detect. By
their total reliance on a mathematical premise and
cumulative prior interpretations of experiments, the
"thought experiments" in modern physics are of this
nature.
Mathematical physicists in modern times are not
the apprentice scientists that formed the foundation of
their sciences. Many have become the sorcerer's
apprentice, self-proclaimed custodians of a mysterious
mathematical and philosophical truth whose existence
and absolute validity is never doubted, but whose nature
is misunderstood."
Concern, Max 2004
Ghosts in the machine of relativity [Part 2]: the incredible
lightness of being in Special Relativity [datiert: 16.2.04]
/ Max Concern.
In: The general science journal. 2004 =
http://wbabin.net/physics/max2.htm - 6 S.
SRT. LICHT. MAXWELL. LORTF. MASSE. GEDEX.
"Abstract. - It is shown that serious doubts must be
cast upon the current causeless interpretation of special
relativity by demonstrating that omissions of a material
nature in the latter effectively detach the theory of special
relativity from the success of its predictions. The
special theory of relativity is shown to be primarily an
application of Huygens' principle legitimised by
Maxwell's equations. The absence of vitally important
details in the formulation of the special theory of relativity
is shown to result in the conclusions that there
cannot be any physical observers present in that theory
and that the light used in Einstein's derivation of the
special theory cannot be the light of common scientific
experience. These two facts remove scientific support
from Relativism and question the nature and meaning
of the velocity in the Lorentz transformation equations.
These conclusions, together with the obvious success
of the theory's predictions, and its dramatic failure to
explain many physical phenomena, and the inherent
dangers of thought experiments shown in Part I of this
paper, have necessitated the conclusion that a unique
mathematical labyrinth of unreality has been constructed
that encloses and protects special relativity, supports
the mathematical abstractions involved and hides the
details of interactions necessary for an understanding
of the Lorentz transformation equations and the
interaction of particles."
Connell, David V. 2009
Natural relativity - a sensible alternative to SRT.
In: Physics essays. 22. 2009, Nr. 3, Sept.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Connell 2009 (Light speed).
G. O. Mueller: SRT. Kap. 4-Erg.
98
Connell, David V. 2009
The speed of light is constant ... (or is it?) / D. V.
Connell.
In: Galilean electrodynamics. 20. 2009, Nr. 5, S.
82, 90. - Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Connell, David V. 2010
On the problem of the twins/clocks paradox in SRT
/ David V. Connell.
In: Galilean electrodynamics. 21. 2010, Nr. 2, S.
33. - Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Connell, David V. 2010
Red shift is due to the Doppler effect ... (isn't it?) /
David V. Connell.
In: Galilean electrodynamics. 21. 2010, Nr. 2, S.
22, 32-33. - Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Consoli, Maurizio 2003
The motion of the solar system and the Michelson-
Morley experiment / M. Consoli, E. Costanzo. -
[Italien]: WWW 2003. 17 S.
URL: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0311/
0311576v1.pdf - arXiv:astro-ph/0311576v1 26 Nov 2003
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Consoli, Maurizio 2004
From classical to modern ether-drift experiments: the
narrow window for a preferred frame / M. Consoli, E.
Costanzo.
In: Physics letters. A. 333. 2004, Issue 5-6, 13
Dec., S. 355-363. -
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2004.10.062.
Auch unter URL: http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/
800322/files/0410245.pdf (15 S.) -
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004PhLA..333..355C -
arXiv e-print (arXiv:physics/0410245)
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Cook, Nigel B. 2005 ca.
Professor Herbert Dingle's problem with Professor
Albert Einstein's special (restricted) relativity and
the site http://www.mathpages.com/home/
kmath024/kmath024.htm / Nigel Cook. - [Land?]:
WWW 2005 ca.. 7 S.
URL: http://quantumfieldtheory.org/Dingle.pdf
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Cornelius, Friedrich 1965
Rechenfehler in der Relativitätstheorie / Friedrich Cornelius.
Typoskript. - Greifenberg am Ammersee: Briefbuch-Verl.
F. Cornelius [Selbstverlag] 1965. 4 S.
SRT. MATH.
Textversion 1.2 - 2012