2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

2011 AIAS - Alpha Institute
of Advanced Studies
AIAS - Alpha Institute of Advanced Studies: URL:
www.aias.us/
Begründer: Myron W. Evans. - [USA]: WWW 2011.
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
2011 Apeiron
Apeiron: journal of inquiry into infinite nature (später:
studies in infinite nature); URL:
redshift.vif.com/Apeiron_Home.htm
[Hrsg., 1987:] Henrik Broberg, Toivo Jaakkola, C.
Roy Keys, David Roscoe; CDROM-Ausgabe. - [Kanada]:
WWW 2011.
2011: Apeiron is a scientific journal devoted to cosmology
and fundamental physics. Alle Jahrgänge digitalisiert
im Web verfügbar. - Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
2011 The general science journal - GSJ
[Internetportal]
The general science journal - GSJ [Internetportal]:
[Themen des "GSJournal":] Mechanics, Electrodynamics,
Space, Mathematics, Mahematical Physics,
Molecular Biology, Medicine, Philosophy, Quantum
Physics, Relativity Theory / [Betreiber:] Walter
Babin. - [Kanada]: WWW 2011.
URL: http://wbabin.net/ - Status: Kritik. - Quelle:
Autopsie.
2011 Kritische Stimmen
zur Relativitätstheorie
[Internetportal]
Kritische Stimmen zur Relativitätstheorie [Internetportal]:
URL:
http://wissenschaftliche-physik.com
[Betreiber:] Ekkehard Friebe, Jocelyne Lopez.
München: WWW 2011.
SRT. ART. SOZIO.
Auszüge: "Diese Internetpräsenz ist aus dem Verein
"GFWP - Gesellschaft zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen
Physik e.V." hervorgegangen, der 1995 von den
beiden Physikern Dr. Georg Galeczki und Dr. Peter
Marquardt gegründet und am 09.10.2010 durch
Mitgliederbeschluss aufgelöst wurde, um die bisherigen
Aktivitäten außerhalb von administrativen Vereinsstrukturen
flexiblerer zu entwickeln. Dabei gilt unser
Hauptaugenmerk weiterhin den Relativitätstheorien von
Albert Einstein, die wir nicht nur unter wissenschaftlichen
Gesichtspunkten betrachten, sondern auch unter
soziologischen, psychologischen und historischen.
Insbesondere tragen wir die Idee der Gründer der ehemaligen
GFWP weiter, die mit ihrem gemeinsamen
Buch "Requiem für die spezielle Relativität" einen
herausragenden Beitrag zur wissenschaftlichen Hinterfragung
dieser Theorie geleistet haben." - Gliederung:
Startseite - Über uns - Blog - Projekt G.O. Mueller
- Links - Impressum.
2011 An open letter
to the physics community - 11/14/10 -
the twin paradox
An open letter to the physics community - 11/14/10
- the twin paradox: [14. Nov. 2010] / NPA - Natural
Philosophy Association. - USA: WWW 2011. 3 S.
URL:http://worknotes.com/Physics/
SpecialRelativity/TwinParadox/page1.aspx
NPA Twin Paradox Report: URL: http://worknotes.com/
Physics/SpecialRelativity/TwinParadox/page2.aspx
SRT. ZWP. SOZIO.
Text des Briefes: "2011 is the centennial anniversary
of the publication of Paul Langevin's famous paper
"On Space and Time" in which he introduced, what
became popularly known, as the Twin Paradox. This
letter discusses the results of a recent study of the
Twin Paradox problem. This NPA study concluded
that, after 100 years of work on this famous problem in
special relativity, the Twin Paradox continues to be
unresolved. Our purpose in writing this letter is to
request that a specific, new course of action be
undertaken to resolve this problem.
A summary of our findings, as detailed in the NPA
Twin Paradox Report, is as follows. We investigated
published books and journal papers and interviewed
proponents of claimed resolutions of the problem. The
proposed resolutions were divided into the following
categories:
- Resolutions that claimed to employ only the postulates
and methods of the special or restricted theory of
relativity in which the differential aging effect is due
to relative motion.
- Resolutions that invoke the general theory of relativity
and, by implication, contend that there is no solution
possible from the principles of the special theory of
relativity.
- Resolutions that invoke, often implicitly, different or
additional assumptions than used in either the special
or general theory and, by implication, contend that
there is no resolution possible using either theory.
Hence, it's clear that there are many conflicting
opinions about the resolution of the Twin Paradox
among "mainstream", relativist professors. Although
the mainstream consensus is that the paradox is not a
problem and as such has a definitive solution, there is
no agreement as to exactly what that solution is as the
physics journals and textbooks are full of conflicting
solutions to this problem. Hence, we suggest that an
open, public discussion of this problem be undertaken
with the objective of resolving this critical problem.
We ask that, as step one, the "mainstream" physics
community select a single, definitive solution to this
problem. In addition, we ask that it state which alternative
solutions are essentially equivalent to the chosen
Textversion 1.2 - 2012 33
G. O. Mueller: SRT Kap. 4-Erg..