2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.
YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.
ert Einstein, as a plagiarist and juggler. Needless to<br />
say, the story is biased. Yet it is realistic. This means<br />
that the events described could be interpreted in terms<br />
of plagiarism or/and juggling. (...)<br />
A concluding remark devoted to the ethics of relativists.<br />
The concept of time contraction, just as the<br />
postulate of constancy of the speed of light, is sacred in<br />
relativity - nothing can force relativists to doubt that<br />
the standing-by clock will run fast by a factor of ? relative<br />
to clocks fixed on the periphery of the rotating<br />
disk. Yet, apart from this particular "absolute truth",<br />
any application of the theory of relativity to rotating<br />
systems leads to contradictory and confusing conclusions<br />
(see: http://edu.supereva.it/solciclos/gron_d.pdf<br />
or: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0404/<br />
0404027.pdf ).<br />
Initiated relativists even go as far as to say that, with<br />
respect to such applications, rotating systems are "inherently<br />
ambiguous". How long is the periphery of the<br />
rotating disk as judged from the non-rotating frame?<br />
Ehrenfest says the periphery is shorter than 2[pi]R,<br />
Einstein says it is longer than 2[pi]R, others demonstrate<br />
their moderation by saying that the length of the periphery<br />
is equal to 2[pi]R. A fourth party build careers by<br />
writing long papers where the numerous confusions<br />
and contradictions are "disentangled". And no relativist<br />
would ever find it suitable to ask the simple question: If<br />
any application of relativity to rotating systems is contradictory<br />
and confusing, who gives us the right to regard<br />
the claim that a non-rotating clock runs fast by a factor<br />
of ? as nothing short of an absolute truth?"<br />
Valev, Pentcho 2005<br />
Why Einstein failed to refute the theory of relativity:<br />
[datiert: 1.4.05] / Pentcho Valev.<br />
In: The general science journal. 2005 =<br />
http://wbabin.net/valev/valev5.pdf - 2 S.<br />
SRT. ART. LICHT. C-V. RAUM. KRÜMMUNG.<br />
Auszüge: "In Section 22 in his "Relativity" Einstein<br />
denounces the validity of the postulate of constancy of<br />
the speed of light in a gravitational field: "A curvature<br />
of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of<br />
propagation of light varies with position." This means<br />
that, if the position in question is occupied by an observer,<br />
this observer will measure a speed of light different<br />
from (e.g. greater than) c. The line of argument can be<br />
continued by applying the equivalence principle - then<br />
it will turn out that the measured speed of light depends<br />
on the speed of the observer<br />
(see: http://www.wbabin.net/valev/valev3.htm ).<br />
The discovered falsehood of the fundamental postulate<br />
should have made Einstein write extensive papers<br />
exploring all the consequences and convincingly explaining<br />
why an observer measuring a variable speed of<br />
light should nevertheless continue to believe in the<br />
theory of relativity. Needless to say, Einstein did not<br />
do so. Why? Is only his ethics to blame?"<br />
Valev, Pentcho 2011<br />
Einsteiniana's lunacy [Foren-Beitrag]: GSJ Physics<br />
Forum [Sammlung von <strong>kritische</strong>n Internet-Seiten, mit<br />
Textauszügen] / Pentcho Valev. - [Kanada]: WWW<br />
2011. 13 S.<br />
URL: http://www.network54.com/Forum/304711/<br />
thread/1299399100/last-1300008213/<br />
EINSTEINIANA%27S+LUNACY<br />
Status: Kritik. - Autopsie.<br />
Valev, Pentcho 2011<br />
What happens to false theories? [Foren-Beitrag]:<br />
Docendi.org, Science Forum, Newsgroup sci.logic [Sammlung<br />
von <strong>kritische</strong>n Internet-Seiten, mit Textauszügen] /<br />
Pentcho Valev. - [Land?]: WWW 2011. 6 S.<br />
URL: http://science.niuz.biz/ret416586.html?s=<br />
2c767624730afad0c2d3675702f92fd3&s=<br />
a84d5fda579a6171b005271c...<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Valigra, Lori 2003<br />
New theory on light weighs heavily on scientists / Lori<br />
Valigra. - [USA]: WWW 2003. 2 S.<br />
In: The christian science monitor. 2003, 30. Jan.<br />
Auch unter URL: http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/<br />
0130/p14s03-bogn.html<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Van der Togt, Carel 1999<br />
Van paradox tot paradigma / Van der Togt, Carel. -<br />
The Hague: Johan Bakker Uitgeverij Relatief 1999.<br />
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Van der Togt: Quantum<br />
mechanics and the ether. 2009.<br />
Van der Togt, Carel 2004<br />
From paradox to paradigm: translation of the book<br />
"Van Paradox to Paradigm" Johan Bakker Uitgeverij<br />
Relatief, 1999 / Carel van der Togt. - [Niederlande]:<br />
WWW 2004.<br />
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Vorwort u. Inhaltsverz.;<br />
URL: http://www.paradox-paradigm.nl/<br />
Van der Togt, Carel 2004<br />
Stellar aberration and the unjustified denial of ether:<br />
[datiert: 31.5.04] / Carel van der Togt.<br />
In: The general science journal. 2004 =<br />
http://www.wbabin.net/Science-Journals/<br />
Research%20Papers-Astrophysics/Download/<br />
1176 - 3 S.<br />
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />
Textversion 1.2 - 2012 313<br />
G. O. Mueller: SRT Kap. 4-Erg..