30.11.2012 Aufrufe

2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

ert Einstein, as a plagiarist and juggler. Needless to<br />

say, the story is biased. Yet it is realistic. This means<br />

that the events described could be interpreted in terms<br />

of plagiarism or/and juggling. (...)<br />

A concluding remark devoted to the ethics of relativists.<br />

The concept of time contraction, just as the<br />

postulate of constancy of the speed of light, is sacred in<br />

relativity - nothing can force relativists to doubt that<br />

the standing-by clock will run fast by a factor of ? relative<br />

to clocks fixed on the periphery of the rotating<br />

disk. Yet, apart from this particular "absolute truth",<br />

any application of the theory of relativity to rotating<br />

systems leads to contradictory and confusing conclusions<br />

(see: http://edu.supereva.it/solciclos/gron_d.pdf<br />

or: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0404/<br />

0404027.pdf ).<br />

Initiated relativists even go as far as to say that, with<br />

respect to such applications, rotating systems are "inherently<br />

ambiguous". How long is the periphery of the<br />

rotating disk as judged from the non-rotating frame?<br />

Ehrenfest says the periphery is shorter than 2[pi]R,<br />

Einstein says it is longer than 2[pi]R, others demonstrate<br />

their moderation by saying that the length of the periphery<br />

is equal to 2[pi]R. A fourth party build careers by<br />

writing long papers where the numerous confusions<br />

and contradictions are "disentangled". And no relativist<br />

would ever find it suitable to ask the simple question: If<br />

any application of relativity to rotating systems is contradictory<br />

and confusing, who gives us the right to regard<br />

the claim that a non-rotating clock runs fast by a factor<br />

of ? as nothing short of an absolute truth?"<br />

Valev, Pentcho 2005<br />

Why Einstein failed to refute the theory of relativity:<br />

[datiert: 1.4.05] / Pentcho Valev.<br />

In: The general science journal. 2005 =<br />

http://wbabin.net/valev/valev5.pdf - 2 S.<br />

SRT. ART. LICHT. C-V. RAUM. KRÜMMUNG.<br />

Auszüge: "In Section 22 in his "Relativity" Einstein<br />

denounces the validity of the postulate of constancy of<br />

the speed of light in a gravitational field: "A curvature<br />

of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of<br />

propagation of light varies with position." This means<br />

that, if the position in question is occupied by an observer,<br />

this observer will measure a speed of light different<br />

from (e.g. greater than) c. The line of argument can be<br />

continued by applying the equivalence principle - then<br />

it will turn out that the measured speed of light depends<br />

on the speed of the observer<br />

(see: http://www.wbabin.net/valev/valev3.htm ).<br />

The discovered falsehood of the fundamental postulate<br />

should have made Einstein write extensive papers<br />

exploring all the consequences and convincingly explaining<br />

why an observer measuring a variable speed of<br />

light should nevertheless continue to believe in the<br />

theory of relativity. Needless to say, Einstein did not<br />

do so. Why? Is only his ethics to blame?"<br />

Valev, Pentcho 2011<br />

Einsteiniana's lunacy [Foren-Beitrag]: GSJ Physics<br />

Forum [Sammlung von <strong>kritische</strong>n Internet-Seiten, mit<br />

Textauszügen] / Pentcho Valev. - [Kanada]: WWW<br />

2011. 13 S.<br />

URL: http://www.network54.com/Forum/304711/<br />

thread/1299399100/last-1300008213/<br />

EINSTEINIANA%27S+LUNACY<br />

Status: Kritik. - Autopsie.<br />

Valev, Pentcho 2011<br />

What happens to false theories? [Foren-Beitrag]:<br />

Docendi.org, Science Forum, Newsgroup sci.logic [Sammlung<br />

von <strong>kritische</strong>n Internet-Seiten, mit Textauszügen] /<br />

Pentcho Valev. - [Land?]: WWW 2011. 6 S.<br />

URL: http://science.niuz.biz/ret416586.html?s=<br />

2c767624730afad0c2d3675702f92fd3&amp;s=<br />

a84d5fda579a6171b005271c...<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Valigra, Lori 2003<br />

New theory on light weighs heavily on scientists / Lori<br />

Valigra. - [USA]: WWW 2003. 2 S.<br />

In: The christian science monitor. 2003, 30. Jan.<br />

Auch unter URL: http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/<br />

0130/p14s03-bogn.html<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Van der Togt, Carel 1999<br />

Van paradox tot paradigma / Van der Togt, Carel. -<br />

The Hague: Johan Bakker Uitgeverij Relatief 1999.<br />

Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Van der Togt: Quantum<br />

mechanics and the ether. 2009.<br />

Van der Togt, Carel 2004<br />

From paradox to paradigm: translation of the book<br />

"Van Paradox to Paradigm" Johan Bakker Uitgeverij<br />

Relatief, 1999 / Carel van der Togt. - [Niederlande]:<br />

WWW 2004.<br />

Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Vorwort u. Inhaltsverz.;<br />

URL: http://www.paradox-paradigm.nl/<br />

Van der Togt, Carel 2004<br />

Stellar aberration and the unjustified denial of ether:<br />

[datiert: 31.5.04] / Carel van der Togt.<br />

In: The general science journal. 2004 =<br />

http://www.wbabin.net/Science-Journals/<br />

Research%20Papers-Astrophysics/Download/<br />

1176 - 3 S.<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Textversion 1.2 - 2012 313<br />

G. O. Mueller: SRT Kap. 4-Erg..

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!