2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.
YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.
inertia, but actually violates the basic condition of<br />
Newton's law of inertia,<br />
one is taking the Earth as an inertial system, then<br />
making the physical rules summarized on the Earth<br />
equate the physical rules summarized on the inertial<br />
system.<br />
Two is forcefully taking the characteristics of the<br />
Earth's gravitational field as the basic characteristics of<br />
the inertial system, then forcefully taking the physical<br />
rules on the Earth provided with the characteristics of<br />
rotation and revolution equate the physical rules on the<br />
linear acceleration system.<br />
Three is that the acceleration of the principle of<br />
equivalence does not have the time limitation, then permits<br />
the body's speed may surpass the speed of light, obviously<br />
is contradictory with the principle of invariance of light<br />
speed.<br />
Four is forcefully taking the mathematical characteristics<br />
of the Riemann geometry equate the spatial<br />
physical property. Obviously, the principle of equivalence<br />
is full of errors."<br />
Wang, Guohua 2005<br />
Persist in scientific truth and show the fact [in chines.<br />
Sprache] / Wang Guohua.<br />
In: Fu, Yuhua 2005 (Research and challenge), S.<br />
20-21. [Referat in engl. Spr.].<br />
SRT. GLZ. RAUM-ZEIT. KRUEMMUNG.<br />
Y. Fu berichtet (S. 20-21): Wang Guohua in "Persist in<br />
Scientific Truth and Show the Fact", "Reexamined the<br />
universe spacetime, reasoned that the space-time was<br />
unable curved - the scientific real observation caused<br />
the wrong conclusion, presently this can be proved by<br />
experiment and explained with the graphical manner,<br />
pointed out that there was only one kind of situation to<br />
be possible to explain the space was curving, but until<br />
now in the science this phenomenon was not observed,<br />
therefore does not exist curving. [...]<br />
The article also pointed out that the relative character<br />
of simultaneity perpetrated a fraud, changed secretly<br />
the concept of simultaneity. Made the brief explanation<br />
to time and the space, this was possible to match the<br />
space-time evolution chart; in this article the reasoning,<br />
the argument and the new formula can mutually verify.<br />
The article presented the new method, opened the new<br />
mentality for researching theory of relativity."<br />
Wang, Guohua 2005<br />
Persisting in the scientific truth and telling the truth<br />
[in chines. Sprache?] / Wang Guohua.<br />
In: The Beijing Theory of Relativity Session. 3.<br />
Annual Meeting. Beijing, 2005. [chines.]<br />
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Li, Zifeng 2006 (Views).<br />
Wang, Jianhua 2003<br />
Analysis and discussion to Michelson and Morley experiment<br />
result with classical physics [in chines. Sprache]<br />
/ Wang Jianhua.<br />
In: Matter regularity. USA (ISSN 1531-085x).<br />
2003, No. 3, S. 258-269.<br />
Quelle: Fu, Yuhua 2005 (Research and challenge), S.<br />
38. [Referat in engl. Spr.]<br />
SRT. MMV. PHOTONEN.<br />
Y. Fu berichtet (S. 38): "The modern physics that, the<br />
classical physics cannot be used to carry on the theoretical<br />
analysis and illustration to the Michelson and<br />
Morley experiment result. However in fact, that is not<br />
true. If considering the photon as one kind of moving<br />
particle, then in the classical physics frame, according<br />
to the optical path chart and the result of Michelson and<br />
Morley experiment, through the prudent and meticulous<br />
theoretical analysis and the logical inference can discover<br />
that, the physicist's analysis and illustration to the<br />
Michelson and Morley experiment result are wrong.<br />
More than 100 years, the physicists never made clear<br />
theoretically, Michelson and Morley experiment result<br />
actually opened out a very important objective fact to<br />
the people, namely: The universal vacuum system is<br />
absolute rest system in the Newtonian mechanics."<br />
Wang, Jianhua 2003<br />
Analyzing and discussing acceleration transformation<br />
formula with classical physics [in chines. Sprache]<br />
/ Wang Jianhua.<br />
In: Matter regularity. USA (ISSN 1531-085x).<br />
2003, No. 3, S. 279-291.<br />
Quelle: Fu, Yuhua 2005 (Research and challenge), S.<br />
39. [Referat in engl. Spr.]<br />
SRT. IS. C. Beschleunigung.<br />
Y. Fu berichtet (S. 39): "When S system and S' system<br />
all are the inertia systems, using the new acceleration<br />
transformation formula to amend the law of Newtonian<br />
mechanics, the new Newton second law is as follows<br />
[Formeln]. Which shows the acceleration a in universal<br />
system, has the different values in the different inertia<br />
systems, but Newtonian mechanics actually wrong<br />
thinking that, acceleration a is equal to the same value<br />
for all inertia systems.<br />
In addition, because the photon's limit speed in the<br />
universal vacuum system is speed of light C, therefore<br />
for the above formula [Formel]. Thus it may be known,<br />
when object's moving speed V = C, acceleration a' = 0."<br />
Wang, Jianhua 2003<br />
Analyzing and discussing coordinate transformation<br />
formula with classical physics [in chines. Sprache]<br />
/ Wang Jianhua.<br />
In: Matter regularity. USA (ISSN 1531-085x).<br />
2003, No. 3, S. 269-279.<br />
Textversion 1.2 - 2012 323<br />
G. O. Mueller: SRT Kap. 4-Erg..