30.11.2012 Aufrufe

2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

eplaced with the concept of Doppler time variation.<br />

We start our examination of the time dilation concept<br />

by going to its source -- Einstein's paper, On the Electrodynamics<br />

of Moving Bodies. We refer to his gedanken<br />

experiment of moving clocks. One of two identical<br />

clocks remains at rest while the other moves away and<br />

returns. When Einstein perceived the difference of the<br />

clock readings in his calculations, he stated the moving<br />

clock "was slow by ...". The immediate perception by<br />

the public was that he meant if a clock was "slow by" -<br />

it had to have run slower. He also said the moving<br />

clock was "behind" the inertial clock by ... . These two<br />

statements do not mean the same thing."<br />

Vergon, Vertner 2005<br />

Addition of velocities: [datiert: 15.3.05] / Vertner Vergon.<br />

In: The general science journal. 2005 =<br />

http://wbabin.net/physics/vergon6.htm - 2 S.<br />

SRT. V-ADDIT.<br />

Auszüge: "In his paper on relativity, Einstein titles this<br />

section as § 5.The Composition of Velocities. "Composition"<br />

is a more technical term that includes addition.<br />

However, it is addition that he discusses. We are not so<br />

much concerned as to how he came up with the answer<br />

as we are about whether it is correct or not. (...)<br />

Einstein sets up the addition problem in the following<br />

way. He posits a co-ordinate system in motion<br />

with respect to an observer. He then places an object in<br />

motion within that system - and asks the question, what<br />

is the velocity of the object with respect to the observer?<br />

Note, all the motion is in the x co-ordinate. (...)<br />

Obviously Einstein's .96 with a momentum of 3.43<br />

is not a conserved quantity and therefore erroneous."<br />

Vergon, Vertner 2005<br />

The dual velocities of special relativity: [datiert: 10.3.<br />

05] / Vertner Vergon.<br />

In: The general science journal. 2005 =<br />

http://wbabin.net/physics/vergon5.htm - 2 S.<br />

SRT. RAUM. ZEIT. MESS. ERK.<br />

Auszüge: "At the outset it would be well to quote Nick<br />

Herbert from his book, "Quantum Reality" ... In one<br />

sentence he put forth the key that everyone considering<br />

relativity should constantly keep in mind for it would<br />

prevent the most common misconceptions in understanding<br />

and applying the theory. The sentence: (emphasis<br />

added)<br />

"In Einstein's new vision, measurements of length<br />

and time are not absolute but depend on the observers<br />

velocity."<br />

How adroit and succinct. Notice Herbert did not say<br />

'length and time are not absolute' - but the "measurements<br />

of length and time are not absolute".<br />

The meaning clearly is that mass (for example) is<br />

velocity invariant - but the measurements are not. Of<br />

course that leaves us with the problem of ascertaining<br />

the cause of the apparently false measurement which is<br />

somehow correct. (Einstein's side-stepping solution was<br />

to recommend that the variation in mass be avoided and<br />

momentum used instead. However, that only shifted<br />

the problem.) (...)<br />

The observed velocity can be no faster than the<br />

messenger. In observing a rod (longitudinal length) it<br />

seems to contract. This is our longitudinal displacement.<br />

It should be stressed that the rod, in its own coordinate<br />

system does not contract (proper length) but the<br />

"observation" of it does. Next, let us consider that the<br />

length of a rod is also a distance - and distance per unit<br />

of time is velocity. Thus we can say that if the observation<br />

of length contracts so does the observation of<br />

velocity. It should be noted that as we have two lengths<br />

- the proper and the observed, we also have two velocities,<br />

the proper and the observed." � Mit der Unterscheidung<br />

der "dual velocities" nach "wirklicher unveränderter<br />

Größe" und "veränderter gemessener Größe"<br />

thematisiert Vergon den Widerspruch zwischen "Anschein"<br />

und "Wirklichkeit" in der Auseinandersetzung<br />

über die Theorie und ordnet den "Anschein" dem veränderten<br />

Messungswert zu - und die unveränderte Größe<br />

der Wirklichkeit. Damit bringt er die Relativisten<br />

um ihre asymmetrischen, einseitigen und nicht begründbaren<br />

Kronjuwelen: Längenkontraktion, Zeitdilatation,<br />

Zwillingsparadoxon. Die SRT wird als Messungs-<br />

Theater entttarnt.<br />

Vergon, Vertner 2006<br />

An analysis of the energy-momentum 4 vector equation<br />

and the massless particle: Aug. 2006 / Vertner<br />

Vergon.<br />

In: The general science journal. 2006 =<br />

http://www.wbabin.net/Science-Journals/<br />

Research%20Papers-Relativity%20Theory/<br />

Download/825 - 2 S.<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Vergon, Vertner 2006<br />

The dual velocity theory of relativity / Vertner Vergon.<br />

In: The General science journal. 2006 =<br />

http://wbabin.net/physics/vergon10.pdf - 5 S.<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Vergon, Vertner 2006<br />

Time dilation / Vertner Vergon.<br />

In: The General science journal. 2006 =<br />

http://wbabin.net/physics/vergon11.pdf - 7 S. [S.<br />

5-7 sind leer.]<br />

Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.<br />

Textversion 1.2 - 2012 317<br />

G. O. Mueller: SRT Kap. 4-Erg..

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!