2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Mantzaris, Christo 2005
Cracks in Einstein's Universe: [the meaning (or meaninglessness)
of special relativity] [datiert: Oct. 2004:
im Internet: 1.1.05] / Christo Mantzaris.
In: The general science journal. 2005 =
http://wbabin.net/physics/mantzaris.htm - 9 S.
SRT. IS. ZEIT. GLZ. ERK.
Auszug: "This article critically examines four pillars
of special relativity: Einstein's theory of relative motion,
his rejection of the concept of an independent trajectory
of motion through space for motion relative to a
practically rigid body of reference, the relativity of
simultaneity and the relativity of time. (...)
How can we be assured that we're talking about the
same event? As we noted earlier in discussing
trajectories, if there is no actual event of which the two
different events are descriptions, there is no basis to
determine that they are descriptions of one common
event.
The notion of the relativity of simultaneity is based,
not on two different events being different for two
different observers, but on one same event being two
different events for two different observers. For only in
such a case can one contend that the same event is simultaneous
for one observer and not simultaneous for another.
But what event is this same event? It cannot be
either of the two descriptions because then the other,
being different, could not be a valid description of it.
For example the common event cannot be the simultaneous
one, because then the other, the event at two
different times, could not be a valid description of it.
And of course the same is true if we chose the event
that occurs at 2 different times, because then the simultaneous
event could not be a valid description of it. (...)
What then becomes of those events that occurred in
the universe of one observer but not in that of the other
once the train has stopped and the two observers share a
common time. Did these events and there consequences
occur or not? If the answer is affirmative then they
occurred for both observers and if they didn't then they
didn't for both. The point is that if there is now
commonality of events, then the times could not have
been different. If the answer is negative, it remains for
the relativists to explain what happens to events and
there consequences that occurred for one observer but
not for another now that they share a common time in a
common universe."
Marchand-Bey, Edmond-Emile 1921
Nouveaux principes d'hydraulique générale et de mécanique
d'après une étude nouvelle de la contraction:
Nouvelle loi de l'économie des fluides; De la préexistence
des vitesses; Conséquence pour la mécanique
céleste; Critique sur la relativité; Nouvelle théorie du
temps. - Saint-Amand (Cher): Impr. Bussière [Selbstverlag?]
1921. 96 S.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: LOC.
Marchand-Bey, Edmond-Emile 1922
Idées et théorie nouvelles sur la force centrifuge: exemples
pratiques; conséquences pour la mécanique et l'astronomie;
critique des lois Newtoniennes et de la relativité.
- Paris: Desforges 1922. 159 S.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: BL.
Marcus, Ernst 1922
Zur Relativitätstheorie.
In: Frankfurter Zeitung und Handelsblatt. 1922, 13.
April.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Internet;
www.juedischeliteraturwestfale.de/frames/...
Marinov, Stefan 1987
Violazione delle leggi di conservazione di momento,
momento angolare e energia / Stefan Marinov. -
Bologna: Andromeda 1987. 24 S.
(Inediti. 7.)
Später in engl. Sprache als Beitrag zu: Conference on
"Foundations of mathematics and physics", Perugia 1989.
Proceedings. Ed.: U. Bartocci, J. P. Wesley. 1990, S. 163-
178. - Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Internet;
www.alinet.it/andromeda/inedititext.html.
Marinov, Stefan 1992
Will the principle of relativity survive the year 1991?:
[Bericht über die Int. Conference "What physics for
the Next Century?", Ischia, Italien, 29.5.-1.6.1991] /
Stefan Marinov.
In: What physics for the next century? Int. Conference,
Ischia, 29.5.-1.6.91. Proceedings. Bologna
1992, S. 18-20.
Zugleich in: Deutsche Physik. International glasnost
journal on fundamental physics. Graz. 1. 1992, Nr. 1, S.
112-114. - Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Marinov, Stefan 2002
Marinov: Annus Horribilis (The story of) a payed advertisement
published by Nature / Stefan Marinov.
In: Episteme. An international journal of science,
history and philosophy. Nr. 6, Parte 2. 2002, 21.
Dez., ca. 9 S. = http://itis.volta.alessandria.it/
episteme/ep6/ep6-II.htm
SRT. RP. ART. AEQIVAL.
"By my half-a-century experimental and theoretical work
I showed the following (see references in my 16 books,
60 refereed papers, 8 paid advertisements and numerous
papers and editor's comments in the journal DEUT-
SCHE PHYSIK edited by me):" - führt anschließend
seine 18 wichtigsten Erkenntnisse und nennt die dazugehörigen
Beweisgänge, darunter die folgenden 3 Kritikpunkte
zu SRT und ART:
"1. The principle of relativity is wrong. Indeed, I
rneasured three times opticomechanically and once
Textversion 1.2 - 2012 205
G. O. Mueller: SRT Kap. 4-Erg..