2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Li, Zifeng 2008
Special relativity arising from a misunderstanding of
experimental results on the constant speed of light:
received 4 January 2006; accepted 2 April 2008;
issue date: June 2008 / Zifeng Li.
In: Physics essays. 21. 2008, no. 2, S. 96-102.
Quelle: Permalink: http://dx.doi.org/10.4006/
1.3006345
SRT. LORTF. C-S.
"All experiments show that the speed of light relative
to its source measured in vacuum is constant. Einstein
interpreted this fact such that any ray of light moves in
the "stationary" system with a fixed velocity c, whether
the ray is emitted by a stationary or by a moving body,
and established special relativity accordingly. This paper
reviews basic hypotheses and view-points of spacetime
relationship in special relativity; analyzes derivation
processes and the mistakes in the Lorentz transformation
and Einstein's original paper. The transformation
between two coordinate systems moving uniformly relative
to one another is established. It is shown that
special relativity based upon the Lorentz transformation
is not correct, and that the relative speed between two
objects can be faster than the speed of light."
Li, Zifeng 2008
Special relativity being from misunderstanding of principle
of constant speed of light / Li Zifeng. - [China]:
WWW 2008. 5 S.
URL: http://www.worldnpa.org/pdf/abstracts/
003802pep-Specialrelativityarisingfromamisunder
standingofexperimentalresults.pdf
SRT. LORTF. RAUM-ZEIT. C-S.
"Abstract: Introduces basic hypotheses and basic
viewpoint of space-time in special relativity. Analyzes
derivation processes and questions of Lorentz transformation.
Makes derivation of transformation between
two coordinate systems which moving uniformly along
beeline one to another. Finds that special relativity
based upon Lorentz transformation is not correct, and
relative speed between two objects may be faster than
speed of light." (S. 1)
Li, Zifeng 2008 ca.
The essence of special relativity and its influence on
science, philosophy and society [in russ. Sprache] / Li
Zifeng et al.; Übers. u. Komm. v. I. I. Smulskii. - [Russland]:
WWW 2008 ca.. 13 S.
URL: http://zhurnal.lib.ru/s/smulxskij_i_i/
essencesr2rhtml.shtml
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
G. O. Mueller: SRT. Kap. 4-Erg.
192
Li, Zifeng 2008 ca.
The essence of special relativity and its influence on
science, philosophy and society / Li Zifeng, Li Tianjiang,
Wang Changjin, Wang Zhaoyun, Tian Xinmin;
[Vorw., Bearb., Kommentar u. ergänzende Lit.-Angaben:]
Joseph J. Smulsky. - [Kanada]: WWW 2008 ca..
11 S.
Bearb. des Kongreßbetrags von 2007 (Natural Philo-sophy
Alliance, Annual Conference. 13. 2006, 3.-7. April, Univ. of
Tulsa, OK. Proceedings. Arlington 2007, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 126-
130.) - Quelle:
www.wbabin.net/physics/smulsky1.pdf
SRT. C-K. LK. GEDEX. EXP. LOGIK. SOZIO.
Ein Übersichtsartikel zur internationalen Theoriekritik
aus chinesischer Erfahrung (S. 1): "This paper discusses
the current status of special relativity in science and
philosophy, as well as society, reasons for special
relativity becoming famous, three viewpoints on special
relativity in academe, four attitudes of public on special
relativity, comments of famous scientists on special
relativity, periodicals and scientific meetings as well as
networks studying questions on special relativity. This
paper sums up argument that focus on special relativity,
analyzes the mistakes of logic in special relativity,
investigates the authenticity of validations and applications
of special relativity, and concludes that the essence
of special relativity is a wrong logical inference embarking
from the idealist standpoint. It analyzes special
relativity's harm in science and philosophy as well as
society. This paper advocates the materialism style of
seeking truth from facts and the publication policy of a
hundred flowers blossom and a hundred schools of
thought contend, in order to liberate scientific research
from its imprisonment in special relativity. The views
of space-time and mass-energy of idealistic special
relativity should be abandoned, and the views of spacetime
and mass-energy of materialism should be restored
and developed."
Stellt die völlig unterschiedliche Bewertung der SRT
(S. 2) als "the giant theory" (bei den Anhängern) und
als "the disaster" (bei den Kritikern) einander gegenüber.
Die Medien inszenieren einen kritiklosen Jubel,
Kritik wird als "anti-science" und "pseudoscience" abgetan.
Gibt eine Übersicht von 20 überwiegend prominenten
Kritikern (S. 2-3) aus allen Jahrzehnten und
Ländern, nennt die wichtigsten Konferenzen der Kritiker,
darunter auch 3 kritische Seminare in China allein
im Jahr 2003, denen seither weitere folgten.
Sieht den fundamentalen Fehler der SRT in der
Behauptung einer konstanten und identischen Lichtgeschwindigkeit
für alle beliebig bewegten Beobachter,
also die angebliche Nicht-Relativität der Lichtgeschwindigkeit
(S. 4). Kritisiert mehrere Einzelergebnisse: die
Raum-Zeit werde nur in Gedankenexperimenten abgeleitet,
nicht aus realen Experimenten; alle angeblich
bestätigenden Experimente seien methodisch falsch oder
logisch widersprüchlich; die Theorieanhänger müssen
zugeben, daß die Längenkontraktion noch nie beobach-
Textversion 1.2 - 2012