2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Kalanov, Temur Z. 2001
On logical errors lying in the base of special theory
of relativity / T. Z. Kalanov.
In: American Physical Society. Bulletin. Vol. 46.
2001, No. 2, p. 99.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Kalanov: Crisis in physics.
2005. In: The general science journal = www.wbabin.net.
Kalanov, Temur Z. 2002
Letter to all physicists: On logical errors underlying
the special theory of relativity: [datiert: 24.6.02]; S. 1:
Letter. - S.1-2: On logical errors ... ; S. 2-4: [2 Briefe] /
Temur Z. Kalanov.
In: The general science journal. 2002 =
http://wbabin.net/physics/kalanov.htm - 3 S.
SRT. MMV. SOZIO.
Enthält 4 Texte: (1) einen Brief : "Letter to all Physicists.
- June 24, 2002"; (2) die Abhandlung; On logical
errors ...; (3) zwei Briefe, jeweils zugleich gerichtet an
den Präsidenten der APS (American Physical Society)
und den Herausgebers der "Physical review letters", in
denen Kalanov auf die Ablehnung seiner Abhandlung
antwortet. - Die Abhandlung analysiert den MMV.
Textauszüge:
" (a) the Earth and the Sun are in a relative motion
(V is the velocity of the relative motion). This means
that the Earth is moving only in the Sun frame, and the
Sun is moving only in the Earth frame; (b) the Michel
son-Morley interferometer and an observer (doing measurements
and calculations) are in the Earth frame.
Consequently, the interferometer and the observer are
in the resting frame. Because of it, the comparison of
experimental and calculated data must be made in the
resting frame (this is a law of logic!)"
" ... the essential idea: in the case of resting frame,
Michelson-Morley' formulae do not include the velocity
V and, therefore, the experimental and calculated data
of Michelson-Morley are in complete agreement with
each other. On the other hand, such agreement proves
that the Earth is a resting frame under the conditions of
the Michelson-Morley experiments. This means that
the Michelson-Morley experiments refute the special
theory of relativity."
"The essence of my manuscript is in the principal
statement:
(2) The contradiction between the experimental and
calculated data of Michelson-Morley is due to that the
fundamental comparison between them was made incorrectly.
In fact, the experimental and calculated data
belong to the different systems of reference: the experimental
data belong to the reference system related
immobility with the Earth, and the calculated ones
containing the velocity V of the motion of the Earth
belong to the reference system related immobility with
the Sun. Therefore, the comparison of this data with
each other is the first and principal logical error. This
error lead inevitably to the contraction hypothesis and
its mathematical representation - Lorentz transformation
formulae".
Kalanov, Temur Z. 2002
On the essence of time / T. Z. Kalanov.
In: American Physical Society. Bulletin. Vol. 47. 2002,
No. 2, p. 164.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Kalanov 2004 (On logical
errors).
Kalanov, Temur Z. 2003
The theory of relativity: an error of the transformation
of coordinates / T. Z. Kalanov.
In: American Physical Society. Bulletin. Vol. 48. 2003,
No. 2, p. 155.
Zugleich: The general science journal =
http://wbabin.net/physics/theoryrel.htm
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
SRT. LORTF. MMV.
Auszüge: "A critical analysis of the basis of the theory
of relativity is offered. The purpose of the analysis is to
reveal the physical meaning of the Lorentz transformations.
The starting-point of the analysis is represented
by:
a. the standard way of deduction of Lorentz's formulae,
i.e. the way of introduction (insertion) of the Galilean
transformation into the equation for the front of the light
wave;
b. the principle of existence and of transformation
of coordinates: there are no coordinates and no transformation
of coordinates in general, and there exist the
coordinates and transformation of the coordinates of
the object only. (...)
7. Since the objects $M$ and $L$ cannot intersect
one another at any moment of time, the Lorentz transformations
are incorrect. Thus, the theory of relativity is
incorrect. The incorrectness of the special theory of
relativity is proved with experimental data: the experimental
and calculated data of Michelson-Morly are in
the complete agreement with each other in the system
$E$.
(A more detailed consideration is given in the articles
[T.Z. Kalanov, in the journal: Doklady Akademii Nauk
Respubliki Uzbekistan (1995-1999), and at
http://www.mrelativity.net
http://wbabin.hypermart.net/paper/kalanov.htm])."
Kalanov, Temur Z. 2004
On logical errors underlying the special theory of
relativity / Temur Z. Kalanov.
In: Journal of theoretics. Vol. 6-1, Feb-March, 2004.
- 3 S.
Textversion 1.2 - 2012 165
G. O. Mueller: SRT Kap. 4-Erg..