2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

waves without a carrying medium to wave into, electrons
with zero-spatial extensions, particles with no mass,
uncertainties raised to principles .... The list of glaring
absurdities goes on and on and on!!!
Sinbadus: Just because an idea is counterintuitive,
it does not follow it's absurd. Common sense is proved
to be a poor guide in modern physics.
Cynicus: Turn the light in your mind off and follow
us! This is exactly what cultists say to the undecided.
What the Relativists called scornfully 'common sense'
is, in fact, the universal Logos, the eternal principles of
Reason. Why should we take their word for it? They
eat. They sleep. And they go to the bathroom every
day!!!" (...)
"Dingleus: The absurd paradoxes, the glaring contradictions
of modern physics, the intolerance of the editors
and the professors, the cult mentality of the relativists,
the obscene worshiping of mortal beings, all are beautifully
explained away by the Cynicus hypothesis. What
a countestroke of propaganda!!!" (...)
"Dingleus: We conclude that the idea of Falsified
Physics, as hard to believe as it may look, is a good
working hypothesis. At least, it highlights the important
distinction between technology and theoretical physics.
We declare our unbounded admiration for modern technology
and its tireless inventors. At the same time, we
preserve our God-given right to seek the truth, and to
question, criticize, and doubt every aspect of theoretical
physics as it stands today."
Faraj, Ali A. 2001
The infinite universe: remarks on Davison's Apeiron
article / A. A. Faraj.
In: The general science journal. 2001 = http://
www.wbabin.net/physics/faraj2.htm - 7 S.
Bezug auf: Davison, C. J.: The Universe: Finite or Infinite.
In: Apeiron, Vol. 7. 2000, No. 1-2.
ART. KOSM. ABERR. RAUM. ERK. HIS. Newton.
Leibniz.
Auszug: "It all started with Einstein's General Theory
of Relativity. Initially, it was advanced as a resolution
of the conflict between his Special Relativity and Newtonian
mechanics. After a decade or so of half-baked
ideas, Einstein, in the end, sided unequivocally with G.
Leibniz in his well-known clash with Isaac Newton,
during the 17th century.
As his published letters reveal, Leibniz in that debate
was very convinced of the cogency of his argument
against Absolute Space, as an integral part of physical
reality, on kinematic grounds. That is because, Stellar
Aberration (the strongest kinematic evidence for Absolute
Space) was unknown at that time. But when the
debate shifted from kinematics to dynamics, Leibnitz
started to stumble and to waver. Rotating Pails, Equatorial
Bulges, and many other dynamical effects of
Rotating Earth are too obvious and too simple to be
G. O. Mueller: SRT. Kap. 4-Erg.
118
denied. They all point to a simple fact: Absolute Space
is real. In the end, he wrote to S. Clarke:
"I grant there is a difference between an absolute
motion of a Body, and a mere relative change in its
situation with respect to another Body. For when the
immediate cause of the change is in the Body, that
Body is truly in motion; and then the situation of other
Bodies with respect to it, will be changed consequently,
though the cause of that change be not in them" [Jammer,
1969].
Unlike Leibniz, Einstein, however, thought otherwise.
In his opinion, dynamical proofs of Absolute
Space, such as Coriolis Force, Foucault-Pendulum Inertiality,
etc., can be transformed away by simply changing
the frames of reference."
The procedure is, in the final analysis, a futile
manouevre. No change in frames of reference could
possibly transform away such dynamical phenomena.
For this reason, Einstein and his followers have taken
refuge in the 'Infinitesimals'."
Faraj, Ali A. 2004
Absolute velocities: the detailed predictions of the
emission theory of light [datiert: 7.7.04] / A. A. Faraj.
In: The general science journal. 2004 =
http://www.wbabin.net/physics/faraj4.htm - 22 S.
SRT. DOPPLER. ABERR. RAUM. LICHT. C-S.
"Abstract. - In this exposition, the predictions of the
Emission Theory of light, concerning absolute velocities
of isolated systems, have been worked out and discussed
in detail. In addition, the related aspects of this theory
have been reviewed and investigated at length. The aim
is to facilitate the task of possible experimental testing,
in the future, and to dispel long-standing and appalling
misconceptions surrounding this important subject."
Schlußabsätze: "Therefore, the correctness or falsity
of any physical theory hinges entirely on its qualitative
part. Is it true? Is it physically feasible? Is it logically
consistent? These are the bothersome questions, which
the proponents of erroneous theories wish to eradicate
and bury forever, and always end up in being buried by
them instead.
It should be borne in mind, however, that the most
enduring legacy of any scientific endeavor is its collection
of facts and observational data. Theories and
hypotheses don't matter in the long run. Thus, if the use
of some false hypothesis can add new facts to that
collections, then so be it. Only if the fallacious hypothesis
starts to be an obstacle in the way of progress and
agent of stagnation and darkness, then it must be attacked
and bombarded with criticism continuously until its
proponents relent and get out of the way of new approaches
and new methods in the investigation of the natural
world.
At present, it's glaringly obvious that the Notorious
Twins (The Relativity & the Quantum) have outlived
Textversion 1.2 - 2012