2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

physics, the main changes induced by this new perspective
are beneficial to areas where physics has been
struggling, such as explaining experimental evidence
for non-locality in quantum physics, the dark matter
issue in cosmology, and the possible unification of forces.
Recognition of a faster-than-light-speed propa-gation of
gravity, as indicated by all existing experimental evidence,
may be the key to taking conven-tional physics to
the next plateau."
Varesi, Andreas 2005
Erweiterte spezielle Relativitätstheorie: das Michelson-Morley-Experiment
als Schlüssel zur Vereinheitlichung
von spezieller Relativitätstheorie und Äthertheorie;
München, 7.2.05 / Andreas Varesi. - [Deutschland]:
WWW 2005. 30 S.
URL: http://www.einstein-relativity.de/publications/
srt_veroeffentlichung_varesi_07.02.05.pdf
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Varesi, Andreas 2006
Pro und Kontra: Belege für die Gültigkeit der SRT; Stand:
8.1.2006 / Andreas Varesi. - [Deutschland]: WWW 2006.
3 S.
URL: http://www.einstein-relativity.de/
01abb5966a07adf06/index.html
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Varesi, Andreas 2006
Verifikationen des Äther-Relativitäts-Dualismus: Stand:
8.1.2006 / Andreas Varesi. - [Deutschland]: WWW 2006.
3 S.
URL: http://www.einstein-relativity.de/
01abb5965b0a6ed0d/01abb5965f13c0306/index.html
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Vergon, Vertner 2004
On the co-dependence of time dilation, superluminal
velocities, and relativistic mass: [datiert: 17.7.04] /
Vertner Vergon.
In: The general science journal. 2004 =
http://wbabin.net/physics/vergon1.htm - 5 S.
SRT. LK. ZD. DOPPLER. V-MASSE. C-S. ERK.
Auszüge: "This declaration of slower time led physicists,
great and small to recount that if one were to
observe a space ship at high velocities, one would observe
the on board clock to run at dilation time -- t' = t
[v](1-v²/c²). This we know is not so. Astronomers observe
moving emitters, i.e., clocks every night -- and what
they see is Doppler time. Any known constant emitter
is a clock. The cesium atom is an arbitrary choice. The
variation of its frequency is the variation of *observed*
time. In recession, the time is slower than norm -- in
approach the time is faster than norm. Following this
precept, the Twin Paradox never appears. The correct
G. O. Mueller: SRT. Kap. 4-Erg.
316
explanation of the "behind" clock is that it traveled At
Newtonian velocities and thus completed the course in
less time than measured by the inertial clock which
measured the velocity as relativistic, i.e., slower. (...)
Another oversight by Einstein was that he did not
make perfectly clear that mass increase and longitudinal
foreshortening were *hypothetical observations*
only, and not real.(He assumed his readers would have
the intelligence to realize that. He was also stymied
when his mathematics showed infinite requirements
for momentum and energy as a body approached c.
Rather than just forge ahead and toss that on the public,
he should have realized that his work was not done and
that he had to go back to the drawing board to get it
right.
He might have cogitated that since longitudinal
length seemed to contract, that maybe velocity along
that path might observationally contract also. In which
case it could be assumed that Newtonian infinite velocity
was possible -- and as that velocity approached infinity,
its *measurement* approached c. This would account
for the inordinate energy and momentum that accompany
the *measured* velocities. It will be found that those
parameters fit exactly the corresponding Newtonian
velocities. This would lay to rest the bugaboo "relativistic
mass" because that was created to explain the
excess momentum.
There were other mistakes in aberration but they
were not serious and were quietly patched up by those
who came after him. All in all, he can be forgiven for in
the final analysis the STR is a brilliant piece of work -and
no one is infallible.“ � Vergon nennt es ein
"oversight" (Versehen) Albert Einsteins, daß er den
behaupteten Massezuwachs und die behauptete Längenkontraktion
nicht klar als nur *hypothetical observations*
und damit als nicht wirklich erklärt hat. Ganz
offensichtlich will Vergon eine Rücknahme der Paradoxa,
weil sie Theoriefehler sind. Vergons Methode
soll wahrscheinlich seine Kritik nur als "Richtigstellung"
hinstellen. - Nur 7 Monate später, am 5.3.05,
verläßt Vergon die Deckung: "We therefore conclude
that the erroneous concept of time dilation be replaced
with the concept of Doppler time variation."
Vergon, Vertner 2004
On time dilation and Doppler time / Vertner Vergon. -
[Land?]: WWW 2004. 4 S.
URL: (1) http://www.natscience.com/Uwe/
Forum.aspx/relativity/2821/Time-Dilation-and-Doppler-
Time (2) http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/
sci.physics.relativity/2004-10/5803.html.
SRT. ZD. ZWP. DOPPLER.
"Abstract - We examine time dilation and find it leads
to an unforgiving contradiction. We also find it is contrary
to empirical experience. In examining Doppler time
we find it has none of these deficiencies. We therefore
conclude that the erroneous concept of time dilation be
Textversion 1.2 - 2012