2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Entscheidung über die Theorie muß durch das Experiment
fallen (S. 21): "There are forces which are predictable
in some theories, and not in others, for instance
there are electromagnetic forces which arise in classical
MT from a uniform motion, and which obviously do
not arise in SR, and then the final word in this field
must just be left to direct experiments." � Der Autor
will die Sache der Kritik durch größte Strenge in der
Argumentation gegen Widerlegungen absichern. Die
Strenge richtet sich gegen Theorieanhänger und Kritiker
gleichermaßen. Will die Entscheidung allein im
Experiment treffen. Diese Position ist in den Folgeartikeln
auf der Homepage von anderen Kritikern der
Theorie angegriffen worden: die Kritiker untereinander
liefern ein Musterbeispiel für kontroverse Diskussionen,
die eigentlich innerhalb der theoretischen Physik
stattfinden müßten, dort jedoch bezüglich der SRT
seit langem verbannt worden sind.
Bartocci, Umberto 2000
Most common misunderstandings about Special Relativity
(SR) [Teil 2]: [Diskussion über Teil 1] / Umberto
Bartocci, Nick Percival. - [Italien]: WWW 2000. 10 S.
URL: www.cartesio-episteme.net/misperc.html
SRT. ZWP. ERK. EXP.
S. 1-4 : Percival kommentiert Bartoccis Arbeit (Teil 1)
- S. 4-10: Erwiderung von Bartocci.
Percival vertritt die SRT, hat eine eigene Ergänzung
der Theorie entwickelt und behauptet, mit ihr das Zwillingsparadoxon
gelöst zu haben. S. 3: "I contend that
SR is correct as shown to great precision by a mountain
of experiments and by its being one of the theoretical
foundation blocks of all modern physics. I also contend
that SR's opponents have made many VALID points
(e.g., the points you make here). However, I contend
that these "problems" with SR point not to its inconsistentcies,
but rather to its incompleteness or limited
scope." S. 4: "Further, my view is that even if one develops
an experiment that shows an anisotropy in the
speed of light that result, by itself, does not necessarily
invalidate SR."
Bartocci diskutiert, wie der zurückkehrende Zwilling
angesichts der für die Rückkehr notwendigen Beschleunigung
die SRT anwenden kann (S. 4): ""The SR
supporters" are wrong in their assertion, the travelling
twin CAN use SR, but he cannot use Lorentz coordinates."
Charakterisiert die Versuche der Physiker, das Faktum
der Beschleunigung zu verbergen (S. 6): "The main
question is: since there must be an acceleration as a
physical reason for the twin coming back, where do
you want to HIDE this acceleration? I showed that the
must correct thing to do, from a mathematician point of
view, is to uniformously distribute this acceleration
along the whole trip, I know very well that physicists
rather prefer to hide it in a SINGLE POINT (an "infini-
tesimal" time instant!). I hope you appreciated the
mathematical fact that the curvature of the hyperbolic
branch does approach INFINITY, whatever the angle
of the two straight parts of the travel is."
Ein Kernpunkt von Bartoccis Kritik ist das Unbewiesensein
des Relativitätsprinzips der SRT (S. 8): "As
a matter of fact, I always claim that there is no one real
DIRECT prove that the principle of relativity is true for
optical or e.m. phenomena, do you know of anything
available? (I believe of course that this principle is not
true even for mechanical phenomena, but here in the
Earth this prove would be quite impossible)."
Erklärt den Fall, daß nach der Theorie dasselbe
physikalische Phänomen für verschieden bewegte Beobachter
verschiedene physikalische Wirkungen zeigen
sollte, als Totalschaden für die Theorie und erinnert an
Albert Einsteins Stellungnahme zu D. C. Millers Experimenten
1925 (S. 9): "If you have some physical effect
relative to some observers, and different physical effects
of the SAME phenomenon, for an observer moving
with relative uniform speed with respect to the first
one, then SR IS irrimediably WRONG, unless one can
find a reason for that experimental divergence in the
approximations which cannot but exist in connection
with the IDEAL case. But this "game" of finding reasons,
should always be a FAIRY game, and one cannot
introduce ad hoc explanations at the infinity! I wish to
quote to you the words that Einstein himself sayed as
far as the famous Miller's experiments was concerning:
"If Dr Miller's results should be confirmed, then the
special relativity theory, and with it the general theory
in its present form, fails. Experiment is the supreme
judge" (Science, about 1925, I have no time to check).
Today, after Shankland's analysis (1955), Miller is
considered wrong, but if one would reproduce Miller's
results, avoiding the "mistakes" that Shankland pointed
out as a possible cause of systematic experimental error,
then things would change completely ..." � Bartoccis
Einstein-Zitat: Einstein, Albert: The relativity theory
and the ether drift : communication to "Science Service".
- In: Science. N. S. 62. 1925, 31. Juli, Supplement,
S. 8. - Bemerkenswert ist, daß der Mathematiker
Bartocci auf dem Experiment als der entscheidenden
Instanz besteht und sich dabei auf Albert Einstein berufen
kann. Shanklands Versuch, die Ergebnisse der
Miller-Versuche vom Tisch zu wischen, scheint Bartocci
- wie viele andere Kritiker auch - nicht zu überzeugen.
Bartocci, Umberto 2000
Most common misunderstandings about Special Relativity
(SR) [Teil 3]: [Lindners Emails v. 30.3 u.
17.4.2000] / Umberto Bartocci, Henry H. Lindner. -
[Italien]: WWW 2000. 15 S.
URL: www.cartesio-episteme.net/lindner.html.
SRT. RAUM-ZEIT. MATH. ERK.
Textversion 1.2 - 2012 63
G. O. Mueller: SRT Kap. 4-Erg..