11.07.2015 Views

ICOM International Council of Museums - International Institute for ...

ICOM International Council of Museums - International Institute for ...

ICOM International Council of Museums - International Institute for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Decree 29 elaborated the museums’ small collection policy. The national governmentalmuseum could collect by the following means:The stocks from the antiquities dealers who were no longer allowed to sell antiquitiesneeded to be given to the state;The illegally discovered objects were confiscated;The objects that came up through digs belonged to the State;Part <strong>of</strong> the excavated objects would go to the excavator and the other half to the State;The objects that came up from ancient historical monuments needed to be placed inthe museum <strong>for</strong> security reasons;The objects <strong>of</strong> private collections or any other provenance might become property <strong>of</strong>the State or might become part <strong>of</strong> museum collections.Decree 30 mentioned that in case <strong>of</strong> duplicates <strong>of</strong> objects, there was no need <strong>for</strong> themuseum to keep them, but a gallery <strong>for</strong> sale would be opened to the public that wishedto purchase “interesting antiquities at good bargain prices and a guarantee <strong>of</strong> excellentauthenticity.” All the revenues will go to the Antiquities Service (Arch IFAPO/SAHC) 1 .Meanwhile, in 1919, the NMB was founded when the French <strong>of</strong>ficer Mr. Raymond Weillgave a small nucleus <strong>of</strong> his collection (The Short Guide <strong>of</strong> the NMB, 2001: 5). Thatnucleus consisted <strong>of</strong> twenty-five objects that were documented by Mr. Maurice Pillet in1919. For the first time in May 1919, Charles Léonce Brossé mentioned the Muséed’Art Antique du Levant (Museum <strong>of</strong> Antique Art <strong>of</strong> the Levant); this was the earliestname <strong>of</strong> the NMB. He also mentioned eleven boxes that came from the excavations <strong>of</strong>Dr. Georges Contenau in Sidon in 1914. He proposed to make them part <strong>of</strong> the nucleus<strong>of</strong> the museum. What is interesting to note was that those boxes were meant to beshipped to the Ottoman Imperial Museum and were not sent there by Dr. GeorgesContenau. The latter also did not ask <strong>for</strong> them to be shipped to France along with therest <strong>of</strong> his belongings (Arch. IFAPO/SAHC) 2 .On August 27, 1920, Joseph Chamonard wrote a big report on the Museum <strong>of</strong> Beirutand detailed the possible locations <strong>of</strong> a museum. He laid out the advantages anddisadvantages <strong>of</strong> each location. Among the locations that he suggested was the house<strong>of</strong> the Secretary General <strong>of</strong> the High-Commission, the other four were parcels <strong>of</strong> landwhere a possible museum could be erected. One was on the Martyrs Street, secondwas the Islamic cemetery that overlooks the Harbour in Beirut, third was the Ras Beirutarea and fourth was the Arts and Metiers Square. For the construction <strong>of</strong> the museum,he suggested that a proper budget should be laid out and the architect who shouldwork on this project should be French, as in Syria there was no one qualified <strong>for</strong> such ajob. He said that Brossé was a qualified architect <strong>of</strong> the Antiquities Service, but couldnot deal with supervising this kind <strong>of</strong> work as he had a lot to deal with, so he put<strong>for</strong>ward the name <strong>of</strong> Mr. Pontremoli from Paris as he had worked on the construction <strong>of</strong>the Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle in Paris. He also suggested that one should not abideto the idea <strong>of</strong> having a competition and selecting a winner as this system was verycostly and did not lead to good results, as was the case in Egypt. Throughout the letter,it is noticed that Chamonard was against the fact <strong>of</strong> constructing a building; hepreferred the idea <strong>of</strong> renting a building and putting the collections in it. He said that itwas not only <strong>for</strong> economic reasons, but one needed to be careful not to rush things inorder not to encounter problems in the future. Moreover, he said that the collectionswere very poor. The museum had 50 artefacts. Some were collected during theoccupation <strong>of</strong> Beirut; others came from Sidon from Renan’s Mission de Phénicie but1 Confidential Report on the status <strong>of</strong> the ancient monuments in the O.E.T. from Captain Engelbach, Lieutenant Mackayand Captain Weill to the General Commandant in Chief <strong>of</strong> the Expeditionary Forces <strong>of</strong> Egypt, dated Beirut, March 8,1919.2 Letter No. 133 from Lieutenant C. L. Brossé, responsible <strong>of</strong> the Fine Arts Service to the Head Administrator <strong>of</strong> theOccupied Enemy Territories <strong>of</strong> the West Zone, dated Beirut, May 27, 1919.2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!