11.07.2015 Views

ICOM International Council of Museums - International Institute for ...

ICOM International Council of Museums - International Institute for ...

ICOM International Council of Museums - International Institute for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that the budget was very tight. We noticed that on top <strong>of</strong> the letter that Seyrigaddressed to the Secretary General <strong>of</strong> the High-Commission, one got to know theanswer. Seyrig’s observations were accepted, and they consisted <strong>of</strong> the objection <strong>of</strong>any alteration <strong>of</strong> the aesthetics <strong>of</strong> the building (Arch. IFAPO/SAHC) 30 .In 1926, according to another report, the National <strong>Museums</strong> under the French Mandatewere given full financial and administrative autonomy. They received all the antiquitiescoming from the assigned territories. A project <strong>of</strong> historical specialisation <strong>of</strong> museumswas under study (Arch. IFAPO/SAHC) 31 . The museums functioned under the directresponsibility <strong>of</strong> the state <strong>of</strong> Lebanon. Part <strong>of</strong> the archaeological collection would betransported in 1934 to a new location (Arch. IFAPO/SAHC) 32 . Until 1928, the NMB wasunder the curatorship <strong>of</strong> Virolleaud, director <strong>of</strong> the Service <strong>of</strong> Antiquities and theViscount Philippe de Tarazi, curator <strong>of</strong> the Lebanese National Library (Chéhab, 1937:i). de Tarazi took over as Honorary Curator and Chéhab as a temporary curator <strong>of</strong> theNMB (Arch. IFAPO/SAHC) 33 . It was only in 1928 that Chéhab took over the curatorship(Chéhab, 1937: i).In May 1931, the Protestant Mission insisted that the Diaconesses building should beevacuated by June 30, 1931. There was a contract signed on April 23, 1925 <strong>for</strong> aperiod <strong>of</strong> three years and renewed three times. This contract could not be renewed asthe Diaconesses building was needed <strong>for</strong> a school. The museum which was housed infour rooms and the sculptures that were housed in the garden needed to betransferred. There was also the question <strong>of</strong> the Ford collection. It was impossible <strong>for</strong>the transfer to occur as some time was needed in order to evacuate the Ford collectionand the sculptures to the basement <strong>of</strong> the new museum (Arch. IFAPO/SAHC) 34 . It doesnot seem that the evacuation really occurred because in June 1934, the High-Commissioner wrote that the five rooms located under the library needed to be emptiedalong with the garden. He also said, “I think on the other hand that the galleries <strong>of</strong> theSouth building that contained the small artefacts and the Phoenician antiquities couldbe evacuated with no danger to the collections; we have to wait <strong>for</strong> this operation tohappen <strong>for</strong> the galleries <strong>of</strong> the new museum to be ready to receive this collection asthey have a gallery devoted to them.” It would take three weeks <strong>for</strong> the transfer tohappen once the galleries <strong>of</strong> the new museum and its basement have new windows.He also added that the construction work was very slow and that it would take three t<strong>of</strong>our years be<strong>for</strong>e the museum was ready.The construction <strong>of</strong> the NMB had started in 1929 and the sum <strong>of</strong> three million FrenchFrancs was already spent by 1934. According to the Delegate <strong>of</strong> the LebaneseRepublic, three million French Francs were needed to complete the work. The High-Commissioner insisted that there should a clear estimate <strong>of</strong> how much money wasneeded and control <strong>of</strong> the way things were executed (Arch. IFAPO/SAHC) 35 . In March1932, the administration <strong>of</strong> the museum wanted to decorate the walls <strong>of</strong> the museumwith important frescoes that would illustrate the main periods <strong>of</strong> Lebanese history. TheFrench opposed this project as it was against not only their economic principles, butalso their aesthetic principles. This issue was taken into serious consideration becausemuseum curators in Europe and the Americas had a good deal <strong>of</strong> experience in30 Letter No. 856/ S.A. from Henri Seyrig, director <strong>of</strong> the Antiquities Service to the Secretary General <strong>of</strong> the High-Commission, dated Beirut, October 2, 1934.31 Report on the activities <strong>of</strong> the Antiquities Service, dated 1926.32 Report on the activities <strong>of</strong> the Antiquities Service, dated 1933/1934.33 Order No. 3672 dated Beirut, August 17, 1928.34 Letter No. 344/S.A. from the High-Commissioner <strong>of</strong> the French Republic to the Delegate <strong>of</strong> the High- Commissionnext to the government <strong>of</strong> the Lebanese Republic, dated Beirut, May 1931.35 Notice to the Antiquities Service No. 591/ S.A. from the High-Commissioner, dated Beirut, June 12, 1934.7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!