22.01.2014 Views

Azura-Edo Independent Power Plant Environmental Impact ... - IFC

Azura-Edo Independent Power Plant Environmental Impact ... - IFC

Azura-Edo Independent Power Plant Environmental Impact ... - IFC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 7.3<br />

Socio-economic and Health Sensitivity Criteria<br />

Sensitivity Low Medium High<br />

Criteria Those affected able to<br />

adapt with relative ease<br />

and maintain pre-impact<br />

status<br />

Able to adapt with<br />

some difficulty and<br />

maintain pre-impact<br />

status but only with a<br />

degree of support<br />

Those affected will not be<br />

able to adapt to changes and<br />

continue to maintain-pre<br />

impact status<br />

7.2.5 Mitigation Measures<br />

One of the key objectives of an EIA is to identify and define socially,<br />

environmentally and technically acceptable and cost effective mitigation<br />

measures. These should avoid unnecessary damage to the environment;<br />

safeguard valued or finite resources, natural areas, habitats and ecosystems;<br />

and protect humans and their associated social environments.<br />

Mitigation measures are developed to avoid, reduce, remedy or compensate<br />

for any negative impacts identified, and to create or enhance positive impacts<br />

such as environmental and social benefits. In this context, the term<br />

“mitigation measures” includes operational controls as well as management<br />

actions. These measures are often established through industry standards and<br />

may include:<br />

• changes to the design of the project during the design process (eg<br />

changing the development approach);<br />

• engineering controls and other physical measures applied (eg waste water<br />

treatment facilities);<br />

• operational plans and procedures (eg waste management plans); and<br />

• the provision of like-for-like replacement, restoration or compensation.<br />

For impacts that are assessed to be of Major significance, a change in design is<br />

usually required to avoid or reduce these. For impacts assessed to be of<br />

Moderate significance, specific mitigation measures such as engineering<br />

controls are usually required to reduce these impacts to ALARP levels. This<br />

approach takes into account the technical and financial feasibility of mitigation<br />

measures. <strong>Impact</strong>s assessed to be of Minor significance are usually managed<br />

through good industry practice, operational plans and procedures.<br />

In developing mitigation measures, the first focus is on measures that will<br />

prevent or minimise impacts through the design and management of the<br />

Project rather than on reinstatement and compensation measures. A<br />

‘hierarchy’ of mitigation measures for planned activities and unplanned<br />

events is outlined in Box 7.4 and Box 7.5.<br />

AZURA EDO IPP<br />

7-10<br />

DRAFT EIA REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!