22.01.2014 Views

Azura-Edo Independent Power Plant Environmental Impact ... - IFC

Azura-Edo Independent Power Plant Environmental Impact ... - IFC

Azura-Edo Independent Power Plant Environmental Impact ... - IFC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Local stakeholders report that impacts associated with relocation of sacred<br />

sites may be managed through careful consultation and planning, indicating a<br />

level of flexibility and adaptability. The sensitivity of the receptor is therefore<br />

considered to be low.<br />

The impact associated with removal of sacred sites is the most significant of<br />

Project impacts; other impacts are low in probability and scale. Viewed<br />

together, then, Project impacts to cultural institutions during the operations<br />

phase are considered to be minor negative.<br />

7.12.3 <strong>Impact</strong> Description and Significance: Decommissioning<br />

<strong>Impact</strong> Description<br />

As noted previously in this impact assessment, land acquisition for the Project<br />

will require disturbance and relocation of sacred sites and shrines in the local<br />

area, as well as relocation of certain communities. This will be a permanent<br />

change, and will not be reversed following Project decommissioning.<br />

It is assumed that impacts to cultural institutions during the construction and<br />

operation phases will have been managed effectively, including strict controls<br />

on the behaviour and conduct of Project workforce, appropriate involvement<br />

of traditional leaders in Project operations, and effective implementation of<br />

RAP recommendations for resettlement and land acquisition. As such, cultural<br />

institutions will not have been significantly impacted during Project<br />

operations.<br />

It is impossible to accurately predict how local cultural practices will have<br />

changed during the 20+ year lifespan of the Project. However, some areas<br />

where Project closure may have an impact include:<br />

• Any ongoing impacts associated with the permanent removal of sacred<br />

sites/ shrines;<br />

• Any ongoing or unresolved issues between resettled and host<br />

communities;<br />

• Project closure may remove a source of authority and influence for local<br />

and regional traditional leaders; and<br />

• Departure of foreign workers, who may have affected the cultural profile<br />

of the region.<br />

<strong>Impact</strong> Significance<br />

The extent of potential impacts to cultural institutions will be primarily local,<br />

although some impacts associated with traditional leadership and the<br />

presence of foreign workforce would be felt at a regional level. While cultural<br />

institutions and practices can be reasonably expected to adapt over a period of<br />

time, without mitigation the duration of the impact is likely to be long term.<br />

Based on the assumed implementation of mitigation measures against cultural<br />

impacts during previous phases of the Project, the probability of impacts<br />

AZURA EDO IPP<br />

7-63<br />

DRAFT EIA REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!