22.01.2014 Views

Azura-Edo Independent Power Plant Environmental Impact ... - IFC

Azura-Edo Independent Power Plant Environmental Impact ... - IFC

Azura-Edo Independent Power Plant Environmental Impact ... - IFC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

There are no technical details to support this conclusion, that is, no assessment<br />

and calculation methodology were given in the EIA for the neighbouring<br />

NIPP plant.<br />

Table 9.2<br />

Comparison of Significant Noise Sources in Design, <strong>Azura</strong>, NIPP<br />

Noise Source<br />

Noise Specification<br />

<strong>Azura</strong><br />

NIPP<br />

OCGT (Turbines) 82 dB(A) @ 1m 85 dB(A) @ 1m<br />

Turbine Building Design Double skin cladding or equivalent No building<br />

Waste Heat Stack 92 dB(A) Lw 1 No specification 2<br />

Fin Fan Coolers 85 dB(A) @ 1m 85 dB(A) @ 1m<br />

Note 1: Sound <strong>Power</strong> level re 10 -12 Watts<br />

Note 2: NIPP plant noise source assumed to be 85 dB(A) at 1m.<br />

Therefore to effectively determine the cumulative noise impact from both the<br />

<strong>Azura</strong> <strong>Edo</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> and the NIPP plant, the assumptions shown in Table 9.2 have<br />

been used to predict the cumulative noise levels from both plants. Figure 9.3<br />

shows that the cumulative noise emission levels remain below 45 dB(A)<br />

LAeq, 1hr at all receptors within the three communities, except for the four<br />

farms identified within the Orior-Osemwende community.<br />

The noise levels at the northern-most farm is predicted at 47 dB (A), while<br />

levels at the three farms to the south are predicted to be 49 dB(A), and are<br />

predicted to experience noise levels in compliance with the day time limit of<br />

55 dB(A) LAeq, 15hr but to exceed the night time limit of 45 dB (A) LAeq, 1hr.<br />

Table 9.3 presents the individual contributed noise from the <strong>Azura</strong> <strong>Edo</strong> IPP<br />

and NIPP plants as well as the cumulative noise level at the four farm<br />

locations. It is evident that the cause of the excessive noise is attributable to<br />

the calculated noise emission from the NIPP plant and further mitigation of<br />

the <strong>Azura</strong> <strong>Edo</strong> IPP plant would be fruitless as long as the noise attributable to<br />

the NIPP plant exceeds 42 dB(A). If the NIPP and <strong>Azura</strong> <strong>Edo</strong> IPP <strong>Plant</strong><br />

contribute 42 dB (A) at these receptors, the cumulative noise level would 45<br />

dB (A).<br />

Table 9.3<br />

Cumulative Noise at Farms<br />

ID<br />

Description<br />

Predicted Noise Level, dB(A), LAeq, 1hr<br />

<strong>Azura</strong> NIPP Azzura + NIPP<br />

SN_116 Farm 4 38 46 47<br />

SN_142 Farm 3 41 48 49<br />

SN_150 Farm 2 40 48 49<br />

SN_156 Farm 1 42 49 49<br />

The noise impact at these farms are considered to be of major significance<br />

prior to mitigation, as the noise levels exceed 45 LAeq, 1hr and existing<br />

background noise levels have been increased by greater than 3 dB (A). This<br />

AZURA EDO IPP<br />

9-5<br />

DRAFT EIA REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!