10.03.2015 Views

Specs

Specs

Specs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bridgestone/Firestone – Lakewood, CO Addendum June 21, 2012<br />

PSI Project No. 532281 Page 3 of 6<br />

Screen Size<br />

Percent Passing<br />

2 Inch 100<br />

#4 50 – 100<br />

#200 < 30<br />

Imported fill material proposed for use on this site that does not meet these criteria should be<br />

submitted to the project geotechnical engineer for evaluation and approval. The geotechnical<br />

engineer should evaluate the proposed import fill prior to purchase and delivery. Fine-grained<br />

soils used for fill require close moisture content control and careful placement by the contractor<br />

to achieve the recommended degree of compaction and to control swell potential and<br />

settlement.<br />

General Fill Placement and Testing<br />

Unless otherwise specified, fill material should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the<br />

maximum dry unit weight as determined by the Standard Proctor Test (ASTM D 698). Each lift<br />

of compacted fill should be tested for density by a representative of the geotechnical engineer<br />

prior to placement of subsequent lifts. Sand fill soils should be moisture conditioned to between<br />

two percent below and two percent above optimum moisture content and clay fill soils should be<br />

moisture conditioned to a range from optimum moisture content to four percent above optimum<br />

moisture content. Fill material should be placed in maximum eight inch loose lifts. A compaction<br />

test should be performed for every 2,500 square feet for each lift of soil placed.<br />

A sample(s) of the proposed backfill soil(s) should be obtained for moisture density relationship<br />

(proctor test) three to four days prior to backfilling operations to expedite compaction and<br />

moisture content testing by the materials testing service provider.<br />

Shallow Footing Foundation System<br />

As an alternative to the drilled pier foundation system, PSI recommends that the proposed<br />

structures be supported on continuous or individual column footings provided that the subgrade<br />

soils are overexcavated and replaced with moisture conditioned and compacted, structural fill<br />

material as outlined previously. The footings should be designed for an allowable soil bearing<br />

pressure as shown in the following tables:<br />

Allowable Bearing Capacity of Continuous<br />

Footing (psf)<br />

Allowable Bearing Capacity<br />

Bearing Depth of<br />

Foundation Below<br />

Existing Grade<br />

3 feet 4,000 psf

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!