Liečivé rastliny v meniacich sa environmentálnych podmienkach

Vliv abiotických a biotických stresorů na vlastnosti rostlin 11.5.2005
Summary
Using of plants in phytoremediation technologies
Key words – phytoremediation, glutathione, phytochelatins, plants.
A dangerous resulting from a presence of heavy metals in the environment leads to developing of
technological procedures that could decontaminate the environment. Number of in situ and ex situ
technologies, which are more or less high cost and can totally or partially decontaminate the
environment, have been developing. The most of them negatively influence the decontaminated
area. On the other hand technologies, which improve visual aspects of the areas, has been
developing or testing. Phytoremediation is the most progressive developing technology of this
"improving" type of biotechnologies decontaminated the environment. Phytoremediation processes
use of green plants for removing and accumulating of pollutants from the environment. In addition
the phytoremediation uses biological, chemical and physical processes that are connected with
plant growth and development. Here, the mechanisms of uptake and detoxification of toxic heavy
metals by plants and using of the results obtained during the study of the detoxification plants
mechanisms in phytoremediation technologies have been reviewed and discussed.
Poděkování
Práce byla podporována granty: GA ČR č. 524/04/P132, IGA MZLU 250061/2005 a FRVŠ 2348/F4a.
Literatura
/1/ FAO: (2003).
/2/ SINGH, K. P., MOHAN, D., SINHA, S., DALWANI, R.: Chemospehre, 55, 227-255 (2004).
/3/ SHROTRIYA, N., JOSHI, J. K., MUKHIYA, Y. K., SINGH, V. P.: Int. J. Environ. Stud., 22, 245-
248 (1984).
/4/ ENDO, T., HARAGUCHI, K., CIPRIANO, F., SIMMONDS, M. P., HOTTA, Y., SAKATA, M.:
Chemospehre, 54, 1653-1662 (2004).
/5/ BUSINELLI, M., GIGLIOTTI, G., GIUSQUIANI, P. L.: Agrochimica, 35, 13-25 (1991).
/6/ BORDAJANDI, L. R., GOMEZ, G., ABAD, E., RIVERA, J., FERNANDEZ-BASTON, M. D.,
BLASCO, J., GONZALEZ, M. J.: J. Agr. Food. Chem., 52, 992-1001 (2004).
/7/ MORRISON, G., FATOKI, O. S., LINDER, S., LUNDEHN, C.: Water Air Soil Poll, 152, 111-
127 (2004).
/8/ VACEK, J., KIZEK, R., KLEJDUS, B., HAVEL, L.: Biol. Listy, 68, (2003).
/9/ ZEHNALEK, J., ADAM, V., KIZEK, R.: Listy Cukrov, 120, 222-224 (2004).
/10/ ZEHNALEK, J., VACEK, J., KIZEK, R.: Listy Cukrov, 120, 220-221 (2004).
/11/ ZENK, M. H.: Gene, 179, 21-30. (1996).
/12/ GRILL, E., WINNACKER, E.-L., ZENK, M. H.: Science, 320, 674–676 (1985).
/13/ MAITANI, T., KUBOTA, H., SATO, K., YAMADA, T.: Plant Physiol., 110, 1145–1150 (1996).
/14/ COBBETT, C. S.: Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 3, 211–216 (2000).
/15/ COBBETT, C. S.: Plant Physiol., 123, 825–832 (2000).
/16/ CHANEY, R. L., MALIK, M., LI, Y. M., BROWN, S. L., BREWER, E. P., ANGLE, J. S., BAKER,
A. J. M.: Curr. Opin. Biotech., 8, 279-284 (1997).
/17/ LASAT, M. M.: J. Environ. Qual., 31, 109–120 (2002).
/18/ RASKIN, I., SMITH, R. D., SALT, D. E.: Curr. Opin. Biotech., 8, 221-226 (1997).
/19/ SALT, D. E., SMITH, R. D., RASKIN, I.: Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 49, 643–
668 (1998).
/20/ CUNNINGHAM, S. D., ANDERSON, T. A., SCHWAB, A. P., HSU, F. C.: ADVANCES IN
AGRONOMY, 56, 55-114 (1996).
/21/ WATANABE, M. E.: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 31, 182-186 (1997).
/22/ VACEK, J., ADAM, V., POTĚšIL, D., KIZEK, R.: Ochrana Přírody, 60, 18-20 (2005).
341