06.09.2021 Views

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

exist because of forces outside the individual’s control. An individual with an external dating locus of<br />

control would believe that their dating life is a matter of luck or divine intervention. This individual would<br />

also be more likely <strong>to</strong> blame outside forces if their dating life isn’t going as desired. We’ll periodically<br />

revisit locus of control in this text because of its importance in a wide variety of interpersonal interactions.<br />

<br />

According <strong>to</strong> John Daly, cognitive “complexity has been defined in terms of the number of different constructs<br />

an individual has <strong>to</strong> describe others (differentiation), the degree <strong>to</strong> which those constructs cohere<br />

(integration), and the level of abstraction of the constructs (abstractiveness).” 47 By differentiation, we are<br />

talking about the number of distinctions or separate elements an individual can utilize <strong>to</strong> recognize and<br />

interpret an event. For example, in the world of communication, someone who can attend <strong>to</strong> another<br />

individual’s body language <strong>to</strong> a great degree can differentiate large amounts of nonverbal data in a way <strong>to</strong><br />

understand how another person is thinking or feeling. Someone low in differentiation may only be able<br />

<strong>to</strong> understand a small number of pronounced nonverbal behaviors.<br />

Integration, on the other hand, refers <strong>to</strong> an individual’s ability <strong>to</strong> see connections or relationships<br />

among the various elements he or she has differentiated. It’s one thing <strong>to</strong> recognize several unique<br />

nonverbal behaviors, but it’s the ability <strong>to</strong> interpret nonverbal behaviors that enables someone <strong>to</strong><br />

be genuinely aware of someone else’s body language. It would be one thing if I could recognize that<br />

someone is smiling, an eyebrow is going up, the head is tilted, and someone’s arms are crossed in front.<br />

Still, if I cannot see all of these unique behaviors as a <strong>to</strong>tal package, then I’m not going <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong><br />

interpret this person’s actual nonverbal behavior.<br />

The last part of Daly’s definition involves the ability <strong>to</strong> see levels of abstraction. Abstraction refers <strong>to</strong><br />

something which exists apart from concrete realities, specific objects, or actual instances. For example, if<br />

someone <strong>to</strong> come right out and verbally tell you that he or she disagrees with something you said, then<br />

this person is concretely communicating disagreement, so as the receiver of the disagreement, it should<br />

be pretty easy <strong>to</strong> interpret the disagreement. On the other hand, if someone doesn’t tell you he or she<br />

disagrees with what you’ve said but instead provides only small nonverbal cues of disagreement, being<br />

able <strong>to</strong> interpret those theoretical cues is attending <strong>to</strong> communicative behavior that is considerably more<br />

abstract.<br />

Overall, cognitive complexity is a critical cognitive disposition because it directly impacts interpersonal<br />

relationships. According <strong>to</strong> Brant Burleson and Scott Caplan, 48 cognitive complexity impacts several<br />

interpersonal constructs:<br />

1. Form more detailed and organized impressions of others;<br />

2. Better able <strong>to</strong> remember impressions of others;<br />

3. Better able <strong>to</strong> resolve inconsistencies in information about others;<br />

4. Learn complex social information quickly; and<br />

5. Use multiple dimensions of judgment in making social evaluations.<br />

In essence, these findings clearly illustrate that cognitive complexity is essential when determining<br />

the extent <strong>to</strong> which an individual can understand and make judgments about others in interpersonal<br />

interactions.<br />

Authoritarianism/Dogmatism<br />

According <strong>to</strong> Jason Wrench, James C. McCroskey, and Virginia Richmond, two personality characteristics<br />

that commonly impact interpersonal communication are authoritarianism and dogmatism. 49 <br />

<strong>Interpersonal</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> 94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!