06.09.2021 Views

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Jennifer Guthrie and Adrianne Kunkel explored the reasons why romantic partners engage in<br />

deception in their article titled “Tell Me Sweet (And Not-So-Sweet) Little Lies: Deception in Romantic<br />

<strong>Relationships</strong>.” 65 The researchers asked 67 college students <strong>to</strong> record their deceptive communication<br />

in diaries for seven days. At the end of seven days, the students returned their diaries. The researchers<br />

counted the deceptive communication acts in all of the diaries and determined that the 67 students<br />

produced 327 deceptive acts in a seven-day period. The results of this part of their study showed that 147<br />

of the deceptive acts were lies, 61 were exaggerations, half-truths accounted for 56 of the deceptive acts,<br />

35 of the deceptive acts were diversionary responses, 26 were secrets, and two uses of deception were<br />

not able <strong>to</strong> be categorized due <strong>to</strong> lack of detail in the diary. On average, each participant engaged in 4.88<br />

deceptive acts in seven days.<br />

In addition <strong>to</strong> studying how often participants lied, Guthrie and Kunkel 66 were interested in why<br />

the students lied. The students provided 334 reasons for the 327 deceptive acts that they reported.<br />

The researchers were able <strong>to</strong> place the 334 reasons in<strong>to</strong> six overarching motives for lying: engaging in<br />

relational maintenance, managing face needs, negotiating dialectical tensions, establishing relational<br />

control, continuing previous deception, and unknown. In the table that follows, each motive for<br />

deception is broken down further.<br />

Managing Face Needs<br />

Supporting Positive Face<br />

Supporting own and/or partner’s positive face (protecting partner’s feelings and<br />

self-presentation)<br />

Supporting Negative Face<br />

Supporting own and=or partner’s negative face (avoiding unwanted activities and=or<br />

imposition)<br />

Negotiating Dialectical Tensions<br />

Balancing Au<strong>to</strong>nomy/Connection<br />

Balancing the need for independence versus the need for <strong>to</strong>getherness<br />

Balancing Openness/Closedness<br />

Balancing the need for open communication versus the need for privacy<br />

Balancing Novelty/Predictability<br />

Balancing the need for spontaneity versus the need for routine or expected behaviors<br />

Establishing Relational Control<br />

Acting Coercive<br />

Ensuring partner behaves or feels how partner wants them <strong>to</strong><br />

Continuing Previous Deception<br />

Participants indicated that they had lied about something in the past and the particular act of<br />

deception was a way of continuing or maintaining the lie<br />

Unknown<br />

Participants reported that they could not identify their motives for using deception<br />

Table 14.4. Deceptive Acts<br />

517<br />

<strong>Interpersonal</strong> <strong>Communication</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!