06.09.2021 Views

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As the definition from Bochner in the previous paragraph noted, most scholars agree that interpersonal<br />

communication involves “at least two communica<strong>to</strong>rs.” Although a helpful <strong>to</strong>ol <strong>to</strong> separate interpersonal<br />

communication from small group or organizational communication, some scholars argue that looking<br />

specifically at one dyad is an accurate representation of interpersonal. For example, if you and your<br />

dating partner are talking about what a future <strong>to</strong>gether might look like, you cannot exclude all relational<br />

baggage that comes in<strong>to</strong> that discussion. You might be influenced by your own family, friends, coworkers,<br />

and other associates. So although there may be only two people interacting at one point, there are strong<br />

influences that are happening in the background.<br />

<br />

In a lot of early writing on the subject of interpersonal communication, the discussion of the importance<br />

of physical proximity was a common one. Researchers argued that interpersonal communication is a<br />

face-<strong>to</strong>-face endeavor. However, with the range of mediated technologies we have in the 21 st Century,<br />

we often communicate interpersonally with people through social networking sites, text messaging,<br />

email, the phone, and a range of<br />

other technologies. Is the interaction<br />

between two lovers as they break<br />

up via text messages any less<br />

“interpersonal” than when the break<br />

up happens face-<strong>to</strong>-face? The issue<br />

of proximity is an interesting one, but<br />

we argue that in the 21 st Century, so<br />

much of our interpersonal interactions<br />

do use some kind of technology.<br />

Figure 1.1 <strong>Interpersonal</strong> <strong>Communication</strong><br />

“<strong>Interpersonal</strong> <strong>Communication</strong>.” by Bovee and Thill. This file is licensed under the<br />

Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Unported license.<br />

<br />

Units<br />

One of our primary reasons for<br />

communicating with other people<br />

is trying <strong>to</strong> understand them and<br />

how and why they communicate. As<br />

such, some messages may help us<br />

understand and predict how people<br />

will behave and communicate, so<br />

do those interactions have a higher<br />

degree of “interpersonalness?”<br />

Imagine you and your boyfriend<br />

or girlfriend just fought. You are not sure what caused the fight in the first place. During the ensuing<br />

conversation (once things have settled down), you realize that your boyfriend/girlfriend feels that<br />

when you flirt with others in public, it diminishes your relationship. Through this conversation, you<br />

learn how your behavior causes your boyfriend/girlfriend <strong>to</strong> get upset and react angrily. You now have<br />

more information about how your boyfriend/girlfriend communicates and what your behavior does<br />

<strong>to</strong> cause these types of interactions. Some would argue this type of conversation has a high degree of<br />

<strong>Interpersonal</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!