06.09.2021 Views

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

communicate with others. Norms, on the other hand, are patterns of behavior that are arrived at through<br />

the system. For example, maybe your mother has a home office, and everyone knows that when she is in<br />

her office, she should not be disturbed.<br />

Of course, one of the problems with patterns and regularities is that they become deeply entrenched<br />

and are not able <strong>to</strong> be changed or corrected quickly or easily. When a family is suddenly faced with a<br />

crisis event, these patterns and regularities may prevent the family from actively correcting the course. For<br />

example, imagine you live in a family where everyone is taught not <strong>to</strong> talk about the family’s problems<br />

with anyone outside the family. If one of the family members starts having problems, the family may<br />

try <strong>to</strong> circle the wagons and ultimately not get the help it needs. This is an example of a situation that<br />

happened <strong>to</strong> one of our coauthors’ families. In this case, one of our coauthor’s cousins became an<br />

alcoholic during his teen years. We’ll call him Jesse. Very few people in the immediate family even<br />

know about Jesse’s problems. Jesse’s mother was a widely known community leader, so there was a<br />

family rule that said, “don’t make mom or our family look bad.” When Jesse’s parents found out about<br />

his alcoholism (through a DUI), they circled the wagons and tried <strong>to</strong> deal with the problem as a family.<br />

Unfortunately, dealing with a disease like alcoholism by closing ranks is not the best way <strong>to</strong> get someone<br />

treatment. One night Jesse’s mother was called out <strong>to</strong> an accident at a local night club where a drunk<br />

driver had hit several people. When Jesse’s mother showed up, it was only then that she learned that the<br />

drunk driver had been her son.<br />

In this case, the rule about protecting the family’s image had become so ingrained, that the family<br />

hadn’t taken all of the steps necessary <strong>to</strong> get Jesse the help he needed. Although no one died in the<br />

accident, one young woman hit by Jesse was paralyzed for the rest of her life. Jesse ended up going <strong>to</strong><br />

prison for several years.<br />

Interactive Complexity<br />

The notion of interactive complexity stems back <strong>to</strong> the original work conducted by Murray Bowen<br />

on family systems theory. In his initial research looking at schizophrenics, a lot of families labeled<br />

the schizophrenic as “the problem” or “the patient,” which allowed them <strong>to</strong> put the blame for family<br />

problems and interactions on the schizophrenic. Instead, Bowen realized that schizophrenia was one<br />

person’s diagnosis in a family system where there were usually multiple issues going on. Trying <strong>to</strong> reduce<br />

everything down <strong>to</strong> the one label, essentially letting everyone else “off the hook” for any blame for family<br />

problems, was not an accurate portrayal of the family.<br />

Instead, it’s important <strong>to</strong> think about interactions as complex and stemming from the system<br />

itself. For example, all married couples will have disagreements. Some married couples take these<br />

disagreements, and they become highly contentious fights. These fights are often repetitious and seen<br />

over and over again. Mary asks Anne <strong>to</strong> take out the trash. The next day Mary sees that the trash hasn’t<br />

been taken out yet. Mary turns <strong>to</strong> Anne at breakfast and says, “Are you ever going <strong>to</strong> take out the trash?”<br />

Anne quickly replies, “S<strong>to</strong>p nagging me already. I’ll get it done when I get it done.” Before <strong>to</strong>o long,<br />

this becomes a fight about Anne not listening <strong>to</strong> Mary from Mary’s point-of-view, while the conversation<br />

becomes about Mary’s constant nagging from Anne’s point-of-view. Before long, the argument devolves<br />

in<strong>to</strong> an argument about who started the conflict in the first place. Galvin, Dickson, and Marrow argue<br />

that trying <strong>to</strong> determine who started the conflict is not appropriate from a systems perspective, instead,<br />

researchers should focus on “current patterns serve <strong>to</strong> uncover ongoing complex issues.” 31<br />

Openness<br />

373<br />

<strong>Interpersonal</strong> <strong>Communication</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!