06.09.2021 Views

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

you go about creating this circle for yourself?<br />

<br />

One obvious area where physical appearance plays a huge part in our day-<strong>to</strong>-day lives is in our romantic<br />

relationships. Elaine Walster and her colleagues coined the “matching hypothesis” back in the 1960s. 32,33<br />

The basic premise of the matching hypothesis is that the idea of “opposites attracting” really doesn’t<br />

pertain <strong>to</strong> physical attraction. When all else is equal, people are more likely <strong>to</strong> find themselves in<br />

romantic relationships with people who are perceived as similarly physically attractive.<br />

In a classic study conducted by Shepherd and Ellis, the researchers <strong>to</strong>ok pictures of married couples<br />

and mixed up the images of the husbands and wives. 34 The researchers then had groups of female and<br />

male college students sort the images based on physical attraction. Not surprisingly, there was a positive<br />

relationship between the physical attractiveness of the husbands and the physical attractiveness of the<br />

wives.<br />

Other physical appearance variables beyond just basic physical attractiveness have also been examined<br />

with regards <strong>to</strong> the matching hypothesis. A group of researchers led by Julie Carmalt found that matching<br />

also explained the dating habits of young people. 35 In their study, Carmalt et al. found that individuals<br />

who were overweight were less likely <strong>to</strong> date someone who was physically attractive.<br />

Overall, research generally supports the matching hypothesis, but physical attractiveness is not the<br />

only variable that can impact romantic partners (e.g., socioeconomic status, education, career prospects).<br />

However, the matching hypothesis is a fac<strong>to</strong>r that impacts many people’s ultimate dating selection ability.<br />

Research Spotlight<br />

In a series of different studies, Shaw Taylor et al. tested the matching<br />

hypothesis. In one of the studies, the researchers collected the data for 60<br />

females and 60 males on online dating platforms (we’ll refer <strong>to</strong> these 120 people<br />

as the initia<strong>to</strong>rs). They then used the site activity logs <strong>to</strong> collect information<br />

about who the initia<strong>to</strong>rs matched with on the dating website and whether those<br />

people responded. Based on this contact information, the researchers also<br />

collected the pictures of those people who were contacted, so the researchers<br />

collected 966 pho<strong>to</strong>s (527 female, 439 male). The physical attractiveness of<br />

the group of pho<strong>to</strong>s was evaluated on a scale of very unattractive (-3) <strong>to</strong> very<br />

attractive (+3) by people within the authors’ department.<br />

Matching behavior (or swiping right) was not based on the initia<strong>to</strong>r’s<br />

physical appearance. So, people often matched with others who were<br />

physically more attractive than them. However, people only tended <strong>to</strong><br />

respond <strong>to</strong> initia<strong>to</strong>rs when their physical attractiveness was similar.<br />

Shaw Taylor, L., Fiore, A. T., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Cheshire, C. (2011). “Out of my league”: A realworld<br />

test of the matching hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 942–954. https://doi.<br />

org/10.1177/0146167211409947<br />

Research<br />

<strong>Interpersonal</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> 178

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!