06.09.2021 Views

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

Interpersonal Communication- A Mindful Approach to Relationships, 2020a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

One of the inherent limitations of a correlation is that it cannot say that X caused Y. For example, in the<br />

Wanzer and Booth-Butterfield study, we cannot say that someone’s HO caused them <strong>to</strong> be viewed as<br />

more popular. All we can tell when using a correlation is that there is a relationship or that there is not a<br />

relationship between two variables.<br />

<br />

In addition <strong>to</strong> examining relationships, researchers are often highly interested in exploring what we call<br />

differences. Scholars distinguish between two types of differences: differences of kind and differences of<br />

degree.<br />

Differences of Kind<br />

Differences of kind are differences that exist because people fall within a specific category. The class<br />

example I always like <strong>to</strong> use is the behavioral differences between cheerleaders and football players.<br />

Cheerleaders will exhibit very specific behaviors (using megaphones, dancing, being <strong>to</strong>ssed in<strong>to</strong> the air,<br />

yelling cheers, pumping up the audience, etc.) during a football game. Football players will exhibit a<br />

very different set of behaviors (e.g., throwing the football, running with the football, kicking the football,<br />

tackling people). When you have two groups that have very different prescribed sets of behavior, we call<br />

this a difference of kind.<br />

Differences of Degree<br />

The difference that social scientists are most interested in is called differences of degree. The term<br />

“degree” here means that you are looking and comparing the scores of two different groups on a single<br />

variable. Let’s take the concept of height and compare females and males. In a study completed by Max<br />

Roser, Cameron Appel, and Hannah Ritchie, the researchers examined a wide range of issues related<br />

<strong>to</strong> human height. 4 Based on data that was gathered from 1896 until 1996, the researchers found that<br />

consistently males were taller than females. By 1996, males had an average height of 171 centimeters,<br />

while females had an average height of 159 centimeters. This difference is what we call a difference of<br />

degree.<br />

Now, it’s essential <strong>to</strong> realize that when we’re discussing differences of degrees, we are comparing<br />

two or more groups’ scores on a single outcome variable (in this case height). At the same time, just<br />

because we find that the average male is taller than the average female does not mean that there are not<br />

really short males and really tall females. In fact, research has shown us that there is generally a much<br />

broader range of heights among males than there is between males and females. The same is also true<br />

for females; there is a broad range of different heights of females. However, differences of degrees are<br />

not interested in the really short males or really tall females (or really tall males and really short females).<br />

Instead, differences of degrees are examined by looking at the average male’s height and comparing it <strong>to</strong><br />

the average female’s height.<br />

So, there you have it. You’ve now learned two very important concepts related <strong>to</strong> the statistics<br />

interpersonal communication scholars commonly use.<br />

A Note for Professors<br />

We want <strong>to</strong> start by thanking you for adopting this Open Educational Resource textbook. We know that<br />

xxi<br />

<strong>Interpersonal</strong> <strong>Communication</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!