u perspek - Filozofski fakultet u Splitu

[82] R.J. Wallace. How to argue about practical reason. Mind,
str.355–385, 1990.
[83] L. Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations. (u prijevodu
E. Anscombe). Blackwell Publishers
[84] G.H. von Wright. Practical inference. Philosophical Review
72: 159–179. 1963.
[85] G.H. von Wright. Explanation and Understanding. Cornell
University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1971.
[86] G.H. von Wright. The logic of preference reconsidered.
Theory and Decision 3: 140–169, 1972.
[87] G.H. von Wright. Norm and Action. Routledge & Kegan
Paul, London, 1963.
[88] N. Zangwill. Direction of fit and normative functionalism.
Philosophical Studies 91: 173–203. 1998.
[89] B. Žarnić. A dynamic solution for the problem of validity
of practical propositional inference. U: P. Dekker (ured.)
Proceedings of Twelfth Amsterdam Colloquium. str.235–
240. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation.University
of Amsterdam. 1999.
[90] B. Žarnić. Dynamic Semantics, Imperative Logic and Propositional
Attitudes. Uppsala Prints and Preprints in Philosophy
2002 No. 1. str. 1–60. Department of Philosophy. University
of Uppsala. 2002.
[91] B. Žarnić. Imperative negation and dynamic semantics. U:
J. Peregrin (ured.) Meaning: the Dynamic Turn. str.201–
211. Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface:
Volume 12. Elsevier Science, Oxford, 2003.
[92] B. Žarnić. Objašnjenje činauanalitičkoj filozofiji. (neobjavljeni
magistarski rad) Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u
Zagrebu, 1996.
[93] B. Žarnić. Imperative change and obligation to do. U: K.
Segerberg i R. Sliwinski (ured.) Logic, Law, Morality: Thirteen
essays in practical philosophy in honour of Lennart
˙Aqvist. str. 79–95. Uppsala Philosophical Studies 51, 2003.
[94] B. Žarnić. Racionalnost i jezik. Filozofska istraživanja 70.
293