Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

On 2nd March 2007, US General Wesley Clark said: “So I came back to see him a few weeks later and by that
time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said: ‘Are we still going to war with Iraq?’ and he said ‘Oh it’s worse than
that’. He said as he reached over on his desk and picked up a piece of paper and he said ‘I just got this down
from upstairs (meaning from the Secretary of Defence’s Office) today, this is a memo which describes how we are
going to take out seven countries in five years, starting off with Iraq and Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan
and finishing off Iran”.
Let’s take a look at the events of the past decade and see if you see a pattern. In Libya, Gadaffi was in a process
of organising a block of African countries to create a gold-based currency called the “Dinar” which they intended
to use to replace the dollar in that region. US and NATO forces helped to destabilise and topple the government
in 2011 and after taking control of the region, US armed rebels executed Gadaffi in cold blood and immediately
set up the Libyan Central Bank. Iran has been actively campaigning to pull oil sales off the dollar for some time
now, and it has recently secured agreements to trade it’s oil in exchange for gold. In response, the US
government with mainstream media assistance has been attempting to build international support for military
strikes on the pretext of preventing Iran from building a nuclear weapon. In the mean time they established
sanctions which they openly admit are aimed at causing a collapse of the Iranian economy.
Syria is Iran’s closest ally and they are bound by mutual defence agreements. The country is currently in the
process of being destabilised with covert assistance from NATO and although Russia and China have warned the
United States not to get involved, the White House has made statements in the past month indicating that they are
considering military intervention. It should be clear that military intervention in Syria and Iran isn’t being
considered – it is a foregone conclusion. Just as it was in Iraq and Libya, the US is actively working to create the
context which gives them the diplomatic cover to do what they have already planned. The motive for these
invasions and covert actions becomes clear when we look at them in their full context and ‘connect the dots’.
Those who control the United States understand that if even a few countries begin to sell their oil in another
currency, it will set off a chain reaction and the dollar will collapse. They understand that there is absolutely
nothing else holding up the value of the dollar at this point and so does the rest of the world. But instead of
accepting the fact that the dollar is nearing the end of it’s lifespan, the powers that be have made a calculated
gambit. They have decided to use the brute force of the US military to crush each and every resistant State in the
Middle East and Africa.
That in itself would be bad enough, but what you need to understand is that this is not going to end with Iran.
China and Russia stated publicly and in no uncertain terms that they will not tolerate an attack on Iran or Syria.
Iran is one of their key allies, one of the last independent oil-producers in the region, and they understand that if
Iran falls, then they will have no way to escape the dollar without going to war. And yet, the United States is
pushing forward in spite of the warnings. What we are witnessing here is a trajectory which leads straight to the
unthinkable. It is a trajectory which was mapped out years ago in full awareness of the human consequences.
But who was it that put us on this course? What kind of psychopath is willing to intentionally set off a global
conflict which will lead to millions of deaths, just to protect the value of a paper currency? It obviously isn’t the
President. The decision to invade Syria, Libya and Iran was made long before Obama had risen to the national
10 - 158