Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

230,000 miles and Saturn about 200,000 miles. It is most unlikely that the accepted distances to the stars
are even approximately correct.
24. Hard electrons travel through metals more readily than through non-metals. This indicates that they
encounter more extensive positive electrostatic fields between atoms and molecules than in non-metals. At
the same time, the atoms in metals are usually more mobile or free to move around than is the case with
solid non-metals. This is why the best conductors of electricity are also the best conductors of heat. It is
significant that all of the heavier atoms are metals, with the exception of radon which is a gas. This means
that such atoms have a higher net positive charge, which causes a stronger mutual repulsion for greater
distances on atoms which are not directly connected to each other. This greater extension of the positive
zone around such atoms gives them more freedom without breaking the bond which holds them together.
The repulsive forces of nearby atoms, increases the mobility of any given atom.
The heavier atoms contain more protons and neutrons bunched together. The outside pressure needed to
hold a group of mutually repulsive particles together is independent of the number of particles present.
One might conclude that the heaviest atoms make the best conductors, but this is not the case. Silver,
copper and aluminium are the best conductors although their positive field zones are not as extensive, they
have less inertia and so are more easily pushed out of the path of a flow of hard electrons. Electrons which
flow along conductors are continually colliding with atoms in motion. Therefore, it require a steady
application of electromotive force at the ends of the conductor in order to keep them flowing. The atoms of
non-metals are more firmly locked into position and therefore do not have that much of a tendency to move
out of the way and this is why they make good insulators. Electrons follow the lines of least resistance and
so they tend to move on the surface of the conductor where there is less tendency to collide with atoms.
The rules governing the conductivity of soft electrons are somewhat different from those of hard electrons.
Soft electrons are enormous when compared to hard electrons. This can be seen when considering that the
average diameter of a particle is directly proportional to it’s so-called wavelength of the light comprising it (or
inversely proportional to the frequency). The ethers associated with atoms and their fundamental particles
are much higher in frequency than those associated with soft particles. This means that atoms will offer little
resistance to the passage of soft electrons. However, the magnetic fields resulting from thermal agitation of
certain atoms and molecules are involved with ethers which are closer in frequency to the ethers directly
associated with soft electrons. Consequently, soft electrons will interact with these fields. This explains why
metals in general offer greater resistance to the passage of soft electrons than do non-metals.
The ordinary electrical transformer presents an enigma. The secondary of the transformer continues to pour
out or eject electrons from a seemingly unlimited source. There is a limited quantity of free electrons in
conductors which should be exhausted quite quickly. The standard argument used to account for the source
of current is that free electrons in the circuit supply the electrons and are used over and over again. A
simple calculation demonstrates that free electrons in conductors are not the source of electricity.
Consider a wire two millimetres in diameter which carries about 10 amps of current. The electron flow is
concentrated near the surface of the wire. Since the electricity in a conductor travels at about the speed of
light, such a wire 186,000 miles long would have 10 coulombs of electricity distributed over it’s surface at any
instant. The surface area of this wire is 1,840,000 square metres. A parallel plate capacitor having this plate
area and a separation of one millimetre, would have a capacity of 0.016 farads. Even with a potential across
it’s plates of 100 volts, it would still only be able to concentrate an equivalent of 1.6 coulombs, and a good
part of this electrostatic charge would be due to the displacement of the electrons and protons of the atoms.
This voltage is more than enough to concentrate all of the free electrons on the surface of the plates.
Similarly, all of the free electrons in the wire example would be involved if the current were maintained with
100 volts. Of course, a wire this long would have too much resistance to carry any appreciable current with
100 volts, but this has nothing to do with the argument just given. As a matter of fact, even 6 volts is far
more than enough to produce a current of 10 amps in a wire of 2 mm diameter. Therefore, there aren’t
enough free electrons in any conductor to supply any appreciable current. This means that the source of
electrons in current flow is not coming from free electrons in the conductor. The conclusion is therefore that
the hard electrons somehow manage to get through the insulation of the conductor and flow into the wire
from outside.
By the law of action and reaction, since a current has inertia, any change in the primary current of a
transformer produces a force in the opposite direction in the secondary. This reactive force produces a
disturbance of the ethers which produce the voltage or Electromotive Force as a result of increased ether
bombardment. The EMF induced in the secondary winding of the transformer, creates a temporary electric
void in the wire which draws all kinds of negative charges to the wire. The softer electrons quickly penetrate
11 - 130