Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

This states that it is a crime to provide monetary support to any organisation that engages in or
supports terrorist activity. In the opinion of Mr Rooke, by the BBC covering up the evidence about
9/11, they have been aiding and supporting the true perpetrators of 9/11, allowing them to escape
justice, and that this is allowing a false version of 9/11 to continue to be used to justify further
terrorist activity which is still continuing today. Therefore, in Mr Rooke’s opinion, to provide funds
to the BBC through his TV licence fees would in effect be funding an organisation which is
supporting terrorist activity, and under Section 15, Article 3 of the Terrorism Act, he would be
committing a serious crime if he did this.
So, the question faces us: why does the BBC broadcast the presentation by Prof. Rosling? Is it
just to bolster the global warming caused by humans myth or is there some other reason? I’ll
leave that up to you to work out.
However, perhaps we should take a look at the events of “nine-eleven” that being the American
reference to the 9th November 2001. On that day, it was alleged that two large aircraft were
flown into the two largest World Trade Centre buildings, the low grade aircraft fuel was then
supposed to have ignited and the heat of that burning fuel weakened the steel in each building so
that it collapsed under its own weight. The 9/11 Commission Report states that the South Tower
collapsed in ten seconds. That tower was 1362 feet tall (415 metres). The official story is so
ridiculous that I’m told that it is being consider making disbelief of the story to be a punishable
offence !! Now that is really spectacular, you are being told what to believe and punished if you
don’t accept an unbelievable tale. The official story is an insult to the American people in that
they are clearly supposed to be too stupid to realise that the official statements cannot possibly
be true.
So, let’s ignore complicated calculations and advanced knowledge and just examine the facts
from a common sense point of view. In her book “Where Did The Towers Go?”, the university
trained Civil Engineer Judy Wood, points out many impossibilities in the official story and she
provides a great deal of facts and observations. We will not go into that level of detail here and
just stick to a few damning simple details:
1. The official report says that the South Tower collapsed and fell to the ground in 10 seconds.
That is physically impossible and didn’t happen. First, if you dropped a cannon ball from a height
of 1362 feet, it would take more than 10 seconds to reach the ground. Even if every support in
the whole of the building were removed in an instant, it would take more than ten seconds for the
building structure to reach the ground, and all support was not suddenly destroyed in an instant.
The official story is shown clearly to be wrong. If the building had actually collapsed, then that
would have taken more than 30 seconds.
2. The building is estimated to weigh about 500,000 tons. If that building collapsed, there would
be such an impact with the ground that seismometers which watch for earthquakes around the
world all day every day, would record that impact. The records show clearly that there was no
such impact.
3. The area is below water level and the river water is kept out by a coffer dam. If a building
weighing 500,000 tons collapsed on or near a coffer dam it would destroy the dam and the area
would be flooded. That did not happen.
4. If a very large building collapses, there would be a major layer of debris – walls, floors, desks,
chairs, computers, filing cabinets, etc., etc. There was no such pile of rubble as photographs
show clearly.
5. Video graphics experts say that the video of aircraft flying into the building is wholly
unconvincing and clearly a work of fiction.
6. An aircraft expert stated that it is physically impossible for the aircraft to have flown at the
15 - 74