09.02.2018 Views

Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

eBook 3000 pages! author: Patrick J. Kelly "This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion. Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. " THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO. ​

eBook 3000 pages!
author: Patrick J. Kelly

"This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion.

Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. "

THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mr Cater then goes on <strong>to</strong> resolve the famous wave-particle paradox, and the also points out that the famous<br />

Michelson-Morley Experiments actually disprove the Transverse Wave Theory of light.<br />

9. It must be realised that nature’s laws are basically simple. To gain a deeper understanding of the nature<br />

of electrons, pro<strong>to</strong>ns and electrostatic forces, it is necessary <strong>to</strong> look for an uncomplicated picture of the<br />

fundamental particles and the cause of their behaviour patterns. The collision laws involving the molecules<br />

of a gas can be applied <strong>to</strong> the ethers. Also, it can be deducted that electrostatic forces are the result of an<br />

imbalance of ether particles bombarding fundamental particles of matter.<br />

It seems logical <strong>to</strong> assume that electrons and pro<strong>to</strong>ns have a spherical shape as a sphere is the most stable<br />

and efficient geometrical form. It also has the smallest surface area for any given volume. However, such<br />

an assumption leads <strong>to</strong> insurmountable difficulties. Electrons and pro<strong>to</strong>ns have a preferred direction of spin<br />

in relation <strong>to</strong> their direction of motion. The electron follows the left hand rule, while the pro<strong>to</strong>n spins<br />

according <strong>to</strong> the right hand rule. With a perfect spherical shape they could not have any preferred direction<br />

of spin. However, the preferred directions of spin can be readily accounted for if the particles are pearshaped<br />

or egg-shaped and they are hollow.<br />

When ether particles have a preferred direction of motion away from the electrons due <strong>to</strong> reflections, a<br />

pulsating electric field results. The excessive flow away from the electron tends <strong>to</strong> reduce the bombardment<br />

of incoming ether particles. A temporary low ether pressure around the particle is a result of this and in turn,<br />

this reduced pressure reduces the reflections and that causes the ethers <strong>to</strong> move in again and a sudden<br />

increase in ether bombardment results. This is something akin <strong>to</strong> the Coander Effect. The cycle is then<br />

repeated. It is <strong>to</strong> be expected that an electrostatic field is no exception and in this respect, “electrostatic” is a<br />

misnomer. The fluctuations are at such a high frequency that experimental results will see the (average)<br />

force as being a constant.<br />

The behaviour of beams of electrons and pro<strong>to</strong>ns in strong magnetic and electric fields indicates that pro<strong>to</strong>ns<br />

have about 1836 times the inertial mass of electrons. Inertia is directly proportional <strong>to</strong> charge, indicating that<br />

the <strong>to</strong>tal charge of a pro<strong>to</strong>n is 1836 times as great as that of an electron. The idea that the hydrogen a<strong>to</strong>m<br />

consists of one electron and one pro<strong>to</strong>n has never been questioned. To quote from a science magazine:<br />

“When pro<strong>to</strong>ns crash in<strong>to</strong> each other, they release showers of electrons, which suggests that pro<strong>to</strong>ns are<br />

made up of particles more basic than themselves”.<br />

On the basis of relative charge effects alone, it follows that a hydrogen a<strong>to</strong>m, instead of having only one<br />

electron orbiting a pro<strong>to</strong>n, that there are at least 1836 orbiting electrons. However, since the pro<strong>to</strong>n has<br />

relatively little movement in comparison <strong>to</strong> the electron, a far greater percentage of the electrostatic field of<br />

the electron has been transformed. This means that in order for the hydrogen a<strong>to</strong>m <strong>to</strong> have close <strong>to</strong> a<br />

neutral charge, there must be thousands of electrons in one hydrogen a<strong>to</strong>m. This seems <strong>to</strong> create a<br />

paradox as the amount of electricity required <strong>to</strong> liberate a given amount of hydrogen in electrolysis indicates<br />

that only one electron is necessary for every a<strong>to</strong>m of hydrogen.<br />

Scientists have never comprehended the source of the electricity that powers electrical equipment. There<br />

are unlimited quantities all around us, permeating all of known space. This hard electricity is camouflaged by<br />

softer particles which are also distributed throughout space. The flow of this limitless source of electrons can<br />

easily be set in<strong>to</strong> motion. The electricity employed in electrolysis merely triggers the flow of far greater<br />

quantities. Also, when a hydrogen a<strong>to</strong>m is ionised, it only needs <strong>to</strong> lose a very small percentage of it’s<br />

electrons instead of being reduced <strong>to</strong> only a pro<strong>to</strong>n.<br />

Matter is rendered visible by the steady formation of soft particles generated by the activities of the<br />

fundamental particles. It is then apparent that frozen hydrogen would be completely invisible if electrostatic<br />

fields were not cyclic and the hydrogen a<strong>to</strong>m had only one electron. Cyclic electrostatic fields are largely<br />

responsible for the complex spectral pattern of all of the elements. The cyclic pattern of hard-particle<br />

interactions is complex. This complexity increases rapidly as the number of fundamental particles in the<br />

a<strong>to</strong>m increases.<br />

Since electrons move at much higher velocities in the a<strong>to</strong>m than pro<strong>to</strong>ns do, they cover much more terri<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

and so a higher percentage of their electrostatic charge is transformed in<strong>to</strong> magnetic energy. This means<br />

that the positive charge in the a<strong>to</strong>m will overbalance the negative charge and so, give the a<strong>to</strong>m an overall<br />

positive charge. This explains why electricity tends <strong>to</strong> move <strong>to</strong>wards ground and the Earth must posses a<br />

positive charge.<br />

The electrostatic field effects near the a<strong>to</strong>m in close proximity <strong>to</strong> the electrons, will be negative. Moving<br />

outwards, this negative effect diminishes quickly and a zone of positive field effect exists. The position and<br />

11 - 116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!