09.02.2018 Views

Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

eBook 3000 pages! author: Patrick J. Kelly "This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion. Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. " THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO. ​

eBook 3000 pages!
author: Patrick J. Kelly

"This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion.

Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. "

THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Robert Adams has used this construction style as well. However, if an arrangement like this is used, then there<br />

will be a substantial sideways pull on the ro<strong>to</strong>r as it reaches the electromagnet core, tending <strong>to</strong> pull the magnets<br />

out of the ro<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

It is important that the ro<strong>to</strong>r should be perfectly balanced and have the minimum amount of bearing friction<br />

possible. This calls for precision construction and either roller or ball bearings. The construction style shown<br />

above has the distinct advantage that it has an open end <strong>to</strong> both the magnet and the coils and this is believed <strong>to</strong><br />

facilitate the inflow of environmental energy in<strong>to</strong> the device.<br />

It may be my ignorance showing here, but I have a problem with this version. The difficulty as I see it is that the<br />

magnet/core pull and the subsequent drive thrust when the coil is powered, form a "turning couple" as they both<br />

try <strong>to</strong> rotate the axle in the same direction. This places a substantial loading on the axle bearings, usually<br />

amplified by the radius of the ro<strong>to</strong>r being greater than the distance from the ro<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> the axle bearings. This load<br />

will be in the tens of kilograms range and will be applied and reversed perhaps forty times per second. To me,<br />

that appears like a vibration load and is directly opposed <strong>to</strong> the "perfectly balanced" ro<strong>to</strong>r operation being sought.<br />

The radial magnet arrangement generally shown by Robert Adams does not have any of this kind of loading at all<br />

because the coils are exactly opposite each other and their loads cancel each other out exactly. The choice is, of<br />

course, up <strong>to</strong> the builder and his assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of the different styles of<br />

construction.<br />

Robert Adams has produced some additional notes on his mo<strong>to</strong>r/genera<strong>to</strong>r design:<br />

THE 1996 ADDENDUM TO THE ADAMS MOTOR MANUAL<br />

By Dr. Robert G. Adams, New Zealand.<br />

Once construction of an Adams Mo<strong>to</strong>r Genera<strong>to</strong>r is completed and successful running has been attained, should<br />

the reader desire <strong>to</strong> carry out an efficiency analysis, he should use conventional measuring instruments AS A<br />

GUIDE ONLY. At this point I refer the reader <strong>to</strong> reading the section entitled 'Established Methods of Testing<br />

Electric Mo<strong>to</strong>r and Transformer Efficiency' and other relevant information in this update. On reading this section, it<br />

will become clear <strong>to</strong> the reader that establishment teaching of THERMODYNAMICS and testing procedures using<br />

the conventional measuring instrumentation DO NOT COMPUTE WITH THE TRUTH, with either conventional<br />

mo<strong>to</strong>rs or the Adams Mo<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

The question is - 'how can any electrical device claim <strong>to</strong> operate around the order of 70 - 90% efficiency and yet<br />

require a cooling facility, whether it be a mo<strong>to</strong>r or a transformer, without which the device would disintegrate?'<br />

If an Adams mo<strong>to</strong>r can operate on load alongside a conventional mo<strong>to</strong>r of the same rating and, load for load, at a<br />

temperature of less than half that of the conventional machine with a claimed efficiency rating of 70 - 90%, then<br />

the Adams device will be operating around the order of 3 times that of the conventional mo<strong>to</strong>r, and it is, in<br />

2 - 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!