09.02.2018 Views

Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

eBook 3000 pages! author: Patrick J. Kelly "This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion. Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. " THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO. ​

eBook 3000 pages!
author: Patrick J. Kelly

"This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion.

Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. "

THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The ‘B’ coil, wound with 23 AWG wire with a resistance of 4.95 ohms and an inductance of 1.735 mH, and<br />

The ‘C’ coil, also wound with 23 AWG wire, with a resistance of 5.05 ohms and an inductance of 1.78 mH.<br />

Chapter 3 has additional information on the VTA.<br />

Rosemary Ainslie’s COP=17 Heater.<br />

As Kevin Ash<strong>to</strong>n states in his book How To Fly A Horse, 16th April 1958 saw the death of the<br />

scientist Rosalind Franklin at the age of thirty-seven. Rosalind was a talented X-ray<br />

crystallographer working on the problem of how viruses reproduce (essentially, how life works, as her work was<br />

understanding the mechanics of life). The following day the World’s Fair opened in Brussels with the main<br />

attraction being a scale model of a virus. That model was built by Rosalind as she was dying.<br />

She held a research position at the University of London, and later, an appointment, at Birkbeck College, where<br />

she studied the <strong>to</strong>bacco mosaic virus. For a long time, the only people who knew what she had really<br />

accomplished were the three men who had secretly s<strong>to</strong>len her work: James Watson, Francis Crick, and Maurice<br />

Wilkins. Watson and Crick were researchers at Cambridge University. Wilkins had been at King’s College. All<br />

three men wanted <strong>to</strong> be first <strong>to</strong> answer the question of the age: what is the structure of DNA, the acid that carries<br />

the information of life, and how does it work?<br />

Rosalind Franklin was educated at Cambridge University’s Newnham College. Had she been born a few<br />

generations earlier, she would not have been admitted <strong>to</strong> Cambridge. Even when women were admitted, the<br />

university believed that women were not equal <strong>to</strong> men and despite being placed first in the university’s entrance<br />

exam for chemistry, Franklin could not be a member of the university or an undergraduate. Women could not<br />

earn a degree. The number of women allowed <strong>to</strong> attend Cambridge was capped at five hundred, <strong>to</strong> ensure that<br />

ninety percent of students were men. Science, while pretending <strong>to</strong> be dispassionate and rational, has long been<br />

an active oppressor of women. Britain’s ‘Royal Society’ of scientists barred women for almost three hundred<br />

years, on grounds including the argument that women were not “legal persons”.<br />

This disgraceful attitude was, and still is, widespread. Lise Meitner discovered nuclear fission only <strong>to</strong> see her<br />

collabora<strong>to</strong>r Ot<strong>to</strong> Hahn receive the 1944 Nobel Prize for her work. Things have changed little since then. This is<br />

not because women have less aptitude for science than men have. For example, Rosalind Franklin <strong>to</strong>ok better<br />

pictures of DNA than anyone had taken before, then used a complex mathematical equation called the “Patterson<br />

function” <strong>to</strong> analyse them. The equation, developed by Arthur Lindo Patterson in 1935, is a classic technique in<br />

X-ray crystallography. The two main properties of electromagnetic waves are their intensity, or “amplitude,” and<br />

their length, or “phase”. The image created by an X-ray shows amplitude but not phase, which can also be a rich<br />

source of information. The Patterson function overcomes this limitation by calculating the phase based on the<br />

amplitude. In the 1950s, before computers or even calcula<strong>to</strong>rs, this work <strong>to</strong>ok months. Franklin had <strong>to</strong> use a slide<br />

rule, pieces of paper, and hand calculations <strong>to</strong> work out the phases for every image, each one of which<br />

represented a slice of the three-dimensional crystal molecule which she was analysing. While Rosalind Franklin<br />

was concluding this work, without her consent or knowledge, Maurice Wilkins showed her data and pictures <strong>to</strong><br />

James Watson and Francis Crick. Watson and Crick leapt <strong>to</strong> the conclusion which Franklin was diligently proving,<br />

that the structure of DNA was a double helix. They published it, and shared the Nobel Prize with their secret<br />

source, Wilkins. When Rosalind Franklin died, they still did not credit her.<br />

This attitude <strong>to</strong> women scientists does not appear <strong>to</strong> have changed much and the reluctance of humans as a<br />

whole <strong>to</strong> accept anything new in science is widespread. Not only science is opposed <strong>to</strong> women. The very<br />

successful book Fifty Shades of Grey was published under the name “E L James” as the author Erika Mitchell<br />

stated that she wanted her pen name <strong>to</strong> avoid implying that the author was a woman. Is it a major stretch of<br />

imagination that the highly successful Harry Potter series of books by Joanne Rowling was published under the<br />

name “J K Rowling” which also avoids any indication of gender?<br />

I, personally, was never in any doubt that Rosemary Ainslie would encounter fanatical opposition <strong>to</strong> her scientific<br />

paper, not just because “scientists” (for want of a better word) are unwilling <strong>to</strong> accept her simple system with<br />

vastly more power output than the user’s power input, but also because of the (highly offensive) opposition <strong>to</strong><br />

women scientists.<br />

Rosemary Ainslie has produced a pulsed heater system which has been measured at a performance of COP =<br />

17. This is a recent design and as far as I am aware, has not yet been replicated by other people. Panacea-<br />

5 - 94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!