Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

In our loss of weight experiments described above, we noted that the phenomenon of weight loss by a metallic
body placed in proximity of the coil output continued to be observed when only the plate connected to the distal
pole of the secondary was retained. The leaf, although not part of the circuit of the secondary, could however be
seen as part of a circuit for the capture of ambient radiant energy, specifically that generated by the coil and, as
well, that also possibly picked up, in the process, from other ambient sources. To determine whether the last
consideration is a possibility at all, or whether the energy picked up by an analogue of our metallic body or gold
leaf in the experiments described above, is entirely a by-product of the energy transmitted by the plate connected
to the outer pole of the secondary, we next determined what would happen if the pick-up for the full-wave divider
were placed, not at the output from the secondary coil, but from an, in all respects identical, plate (the Receiver
plate R, as opposed to the Transmitter plate T) placed a distance away from, and above, the first one. In other
words, the gold leaf is replaced by a receiver plate, and this carries an attached test circuit identical to the test
circuit employed to directly assess the coil output.
As shown in Table 2 above, the results of the experiment show that there is no loss of energy picked up at the R
plate (Fig.10) when compared to the most favourable situation involving the plate 30 (Fig.9) interposed between
the chirally connected coils. This observation is however not always the case. For best results one should employ
iron, gold or silver plates placed parallel to the horizon, with the T plate underneath the R plate. In fact, if one
employs instead aluminium plates and suspends these vertically, one can consistently register a loss of output at
the divider when changing the divider input from the T to the R plates.
A - 549