09.02.2018 Views

Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

eBook 3000 pages! author: Patrick J. Kelly "This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion. Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. " THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO. ​

eBook 3000 pages!
author: Patrick J. Kelly

"This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion.

Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. "

THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eady-made programs that can be uploaded in<strong>to</strong> the calcula<strong>to</strong>r, or a cus<strong>to</strong>m program can be made <strong>to</strong> fit the<br />

needs of the test. The program that the CBL used allowed multiple thermocouples <strong>to</strong> collect data<br />

simultaneously. To ensure that the thermocouples were calibrated against each other, both were run on the<br />

same constant temperature sample in very close proximity. Both temperature probes agreed <strong>to</strong> within 0.21 O C<br />

of each other. For these experiments, this temperature difference was considered <strong>to</strong> be acceptable.<br />

Procedure<br />

Each experiment was conducted on the campus of Brigham Young University during mid-day, usually<br />

between 11:00 am and 2:00 pm <strong>to</strong> ensure that the sun was close <strong>to</strong> being directly over-head. This allowed<br />

as much sun light as possible <strong>to</strong> enter the solar collec<strong>to</strong>r. Each experiment included several steps, as listed<br />

below.<br />

Before each experiment was set up, the volume of the water and the mass of the container were measured<br />

and recorded. The heat capacity of the water and the container were also found. The area of the cooker<br />

perpendicular <strong>to</strong> the sun’s rays was also measured. To collect temperature data using thermocouple probes,<br />

small holes were drilled in<strong>to</strong> the <strong>to</strong>p of the canning jar and stainless steel canister lids. The jar and canister<br />

were both painted ultra-flat black <strong>to</strong> absorb as much of the sun’s energy as possible.<br />

On the morning of each test, the designated volume of water was measured out and poured in<strong>to</strong> the cooking<br />

vessel. This volume ranged from 0.6 litre for one-quart jars, <strong>to</strong> 1.2 litters for half-gallon canning jars. For<br />

simultaneous testing, the same amount of water was poured in<strong>to</strong> each container. The temperature probes<br />

were wired through the holes in the lids of the containers and secured about 13 mm in<strong>to</strong> the water. For<br />

comparative tests, the probes were placed the same depth in<strong>to</strong> the water <strong>to</strong> ensure that the probes did not<br />

read different measurements due <strong>to</strong> depth-related temperature differences within the containers. To enable<br />

later analysis; the time, ambient temperature, and solar irradiance were also noted and recorded. These<br />

numbers gave a reference point for each test. Each cooker that was <strong>to</strong> be tested was then completely set<br />

up. The temperature probes were secured through the lids, and the jar was placed in<strong>to</strong> the clear oven bag –<br />

supported by a wire cage. Each bag was inflated so that no part of the bag <strong>to</strong>uched the sides or <strong>to</strong>p of the<br />

cooking container. The cord from the thermocouple <strong>to</strong> the CBL was passed through the <strong>to</strong>p of the bag, and<br />

the bag was tied off with a twist-tie.<br />

The test began once both cookers were completely ready and the CBL had been programmed. Care was<br />

taken <strong>to</strong> block the sun from radiating directly on<strong>to</strong> the cookers until both were ready <strong>to</strong> begin. This ensured<br />

that the water in both cookers started at very nearly the same temperature. Most tests were set up <strong>to</strong> collect<br />

one data point every four <strong>to</strong> five minutes, for up <strong>to</strong> two hours. This allowed the cooker temperatures <strong>to</strong> reach<br />

maxima and then remain at a nearly constant temperature. Once a test was complete, the cooker was<br />

disassembled and the data downloaded in<strong>to</strong> the graphing calcula<strong>to</strong>r. Though the graphing calcula<strong>to</strong>r does<br />

allow analysis, a spread sheet such as Microsoft Excel is easier <strong>to</strong> use. Thus, the data from each test were<br />

downloaded from the calcula<strong>to</strong>r in<strong>to</strong> Microsoft Excel. The elapsed time (in seconds) and the corresponding<br />

temperatures were listed next <strong>to</strong> each other. A graph of temperature versus time was made, with the Time<br />

being the horizontal axis for each test. For comparative tests, the Temperature versus Time data for both<br />

cookers was plotted on the same graph. As a reference, a trend-line was fitted <strong>to</strong> the linear portion of the<br />

graph, along with the linear regression and the coefficient of correlation (R2). It is important <strong>to</strong> have a<br />

coefficient of correlation close <strong>to</strong> one, as this is how close the linear regression fits the data. In a separate<br />

column, the temperatures were again listed, however only from 30 O C <strong>to</strong> 70 O C. The change in temperature<br />

for every ten or twelve minutes was found and logged next <strong>to</strong> the temperature column. The power output (in<br />

Watts) of each cooker could then be calculated.<br />

To calculate the power output of the cookers for each specific test, the mass of the water and of the<br />

container were both measured. Though the thermal energy content of the container was relatively small<br />

compared <strong>to</strong> that of water (due <strong>to</strong> the large heat capacity of water), it was important <strong>to</strong> add it in<strong>to</strong> the<br />

calculation. Also, since several different containers were compared, the energy content of the container was<br />

important. The power is found by:<br />

14 - 40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!