09.02.2018 Views

Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

eBook 3000 pages! author: Patrick J. Kelly "This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion. Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. " THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO. ​

eBook 3000 pages!
author: Patrick J. Kelly

"This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion.

Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. "

THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The same sort of situation is found here in the Ainslie circuit as very precise adjustment of the "Gate" preset<br />

resis<strong>to</strong>r "R1" has a major effect on the circuit performance while the other two, R4 and R7, are used <strong>to</strong> adjust the<br />

frequency of the pulses and the ratio of "On" time <strong>to</strong> "Off" time. Like almost every other circuit which produces a<br />

greater power output than the input power required <strong>to</strong> make it operate, very careful adjustment is needed. The<br />

characteristics of the "Load" heating element "R3" are also very important. With some configurations, there is no<br />

excess power generated, while with others there is a very marked increase in power and the pro<strong>to</strong>type apparatus<br />

produced power outputs in excess of four times the input power.<br />

A quick glance at the circuit diagram makes it appear that there is no significant connection between the NE555<br />

timer chip and the IRFPG50 FET transis<strong>to</strong>r. This is not the case as the arrangement as shown generates<br />

transients which modify the oscillation of the NE555 chip. This is presumably due <strong>to</strong> the nature of the current<br />

draw by the gate of the FET or through induced currents caused by the pulsing of the inductive load heater coil<br />

"R3". We tend <strong>to</strong> think of FET transis<strong>to</strong>rs as having next <strong>to</strong> no current flowing in<strong>to</strong> the gate, but the IRFPG50 FET<br />

can draw up <strong>to</strong> a massive 6 amps for the Gate <strong>to</strong> Source current flow. The NE555N chip supplying that gate<br />

current (with no current-limiting resis<strong>to</strong>r between the two devices) can supply a maximum of only 200 mA (or<br />

possibly 300 mA at a push) which is only 5% of the possible current draw by the FET. The circuit of the NE555N<br />

chip is:<br />

From this it appears that the direct coupling of the output could allow some modification of the chip timing and<br />

waveform if the output current draw is well above the design value, the internal resis<strong>to</strong>rs preventing destruction of<br />

the chip and reducing the effect so that it just modifies the functioning of the chip.<br />

This is also suggested by the fact that the adjustment of the "Grid" variable resis<strong>to</strong>r, which controls the NE555N<br />

current draw, is the most critical adjustment of the circuit. Supporting that idea is the fact that the required chip<br />

operation does not take place if the "Grid" resis<strong>to</strong>r setting is <strong>to</strong>o high or <strong>to</strong>o low. Presumably, the setting has <strong>to</strong> be<br />

an exact amount so that the NE555N chip operation is altered <strong>to</strong> make it generate waveforms not envisaged by<br />

the chip designers. The physical separation of the "Load" resis<strong>to</strong>r and the circuit board may also be important as<br />

there is almost certainly a magnetic feedback element as well.<br />

I would love <strong>to</strong> tell you that the circuit operates in the way that the circuit diagram would suggest, with the timing<br />

and Mark-Space values controlled as expected by the 555 chip designers. However, that is definitely not the<br />

case. If the 24V battery is disconnected, then the NE555 chip section of the circuit performs exactly as expected.<br />

If the "R1" GATE resis<strong>to</strong>r is at the correct setting and the 24V battery is then connected, the result is that the<br />

normal running of the NE555 chip is overridden and the circuit immediately switches in<strong>to</strong> a completely different<br />

type of operation. The Mark-Space ratio is forced in<strong>to</strong> an approximately 55% setting and the pulsing rate is<br />

bounced <strong>to</strong> over 500 kHz (well beyond the capability of the NE555 chip, as many actual chips can't even reach 45<br />

kHz in practice) with this waveform:<br />

A - 1430

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!