09.02.2018 Views

Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

eBook 3000 pages! author: Patrick J. Kelly "This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion. Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. " THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO. ​

eBook 3000 pages!
author: Patrick J. Kelly

"This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion.

Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. "

THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fig. 4. Explanation of the principle through the use of permanent magnets.<br />

Possible errors in interpretation<br />

The following errors are possible in the interpretation of the described interactions:<br />

1. Harnessing resonant energy <strong>to</strong> the load.<br />

2. Harnessing the magnetic field energy <strong>to</strong> the load.<br />

Neither interpretation is true. The basic principle shows that the energy of any resonant system cannot "be<br />

tapped" because doing that would destroy the resonance itself. Also, the energy of the magnetic field is not<br />

used, because the magnetisation of the magnets is not changed or reduced in any way.<br />

The most reasonable interpretation is from the position of double energy systems; within which, due <strong>to</strong> internal<br />

organisation, some latent energy is induced - and then fed <strong>to</strong> the load. From the point of view an outside<br />

observer (the oscilla<strong>to</strong>r), this energy is imaginary, but in terms of an internal observer (the output coil) it is quite<br />

real. Moni<strong>to</strong>ring the energy in different coordinate systems produces different results, which conform <strong>to</strong> the<br />

current scientific knowledge.<br />

The Law of Conservation of <strong>Energy</strong><br />

The 1918 theorem of the mathematician Emma Noether states, that each continuous symmetry of a physical<br />

system corresponds a conservation law:<br />

Symmetries of time corresponds <strong>to</strong> the law of conservation of energy,<br />

Symmetries of space corresponds <strong>to</strong> the law of conservation of momentum,<br />

Isotropy of space corresponds <strong>to</strong> the law of conservation of angular momentum,<br />

Gauge symmetry corresponds <strong>to</strong> the law of conservation of electric charge, and so on.<br />

That is, the symmetry exists in Nature, and then that leads <strong>to</strong> the corresponding Conservation Law theory. At<br />

the same time, all the symmetries are seen as "immutable". The possibility of breaking any symmetry is not<br />

even considered, although doing that does not actually contradict anything, it merely changes the physics.<br />

Thus, the Law of Conservation of <strong>Energy</strong> actually cannot be violated as a principle, because that “Law” is the<br />

result of an existing symmetrical interaction and not the cause of that symmetrical interaction. However, <strong>to</strong><br />

bypass the applicability of the Law of Conservation of <strong>Energy</strong> is perfectly possible. To do that, all that is needed<br />

is <strong>to</strong> arrange things in such a way that it breaks the symmetry. The method described above is an asymmetrical<br />

interaction, and Emma Noether's theorem just does not apply (but, that needs <strong>to</strong> be proved at a future date).<br />

The dependence of the output power<br />

The output power depends on several parameters:<br />

1. First of all, it depends on the intensity of the initial magnetic field of the permanent magnets, which is <strong>to</strong> be "moved". The<br />

greater the intensity of that magnetic field, the higher the output power will be. A zero intensity magnetic field produces<br />

zero output.<br />

2. Secondly, it depends on the distance through which the initial magnetic field shifts, that is, from the current in<br />

the resonant coil (or more accurately, on the reactive power caused by that current flow).<br />

18-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!