Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

In other words, the motor 27-28, apparatus 40 and 41, and alternator 42, will still be operating in exactly the same
way as described above, and in the same manner, the high-frequency currents are still developed, producing the
same current intensity which is now passing via terminal 50 of capacitor 48, arc-lamp 51-52, diode 34, wire 32,
commutator contacts 19-17, wire 21, ammeter 22, and positive terminal 23 of battery 1-2 (which is now connected
to contact 38 of the commutator through path 12), wire 37, diode 36, inductor 55, and capacitor terminal 49; also
through duplicate path from capacitor terminal 49, diode 33, wire 32, commutator contacts 19-17, wire 21,
ammeter 22, positive terminal 23 of battery 1-2, commutator path 12, commutator pole 38, wire 37, diode 35, arc
lamp 52-51, and capacitor terminal 50.
It is obvious to state that this same procedure can be repeated indefinitely by the simple altering of the battery
connections from time to time in accordance with the battery capacity and the rate of discharge. Only 400 watts is
taken from the discharging battery for battery recharging, leaving 40 amps at 50 volts (2000 watts) available for
doing continuous useful work.
The patent continues with a description of how a modified clock can be made to move the commutator once every
hour. This is a brilliant 2 kilowatt, self-powered, free-energy design. However, operating the design as described
would not be realistic. Batteries nowadays have limited operational lives offering, typically, between 400 and 1000
charge/discharge cycles within the C20 discharge current limits. Exceeding the C20 discharge rate will reduce
the battery life by a major amount, that amount being determined by the degree of abuse which the battery
suffers. If we ignore that factor and say that our batteries will manage 1000 cycles, at the proposed rate of say,
one hour discharge and one hour charging time, then battery replacement is liable to be required in just 500 hours
of operation. That is, within three weeks of continuous operation.
The essential, rapid switching of this circuit is performed by the spark-gap but in contrast to that, the commutator
switching of the batteries does not require high speed operation. It is feasible then, to replace the commutator
with simple solid-state switching and swap the batteries over every second or two. That way, the batteries are
never discharged and long battery life can be expected.
Bozidar Lisac’s Power-Boosting System.
Recently, a patent application has been lodged on what is effectively the Ron Cole one-battery switch and the
Tesla Switch. I am including the re-worded patent here. Some experimenters have reported overall battery
energy gains with switching speeds of 0.5 Hz or less, which means that in circuits of that type, mechanical
switching should give a reasonable switch contact life. This patent has needed a fair degree of attention as the
person writing it does not have a full grasp of English and confused the word "load" with the word "charge". Let
me say again, that the following patent application is included here primarily for interest sake, rather than being
the definitive way of making a circuit of this type.
Patent Application US20080030165 7th February 2008 Inventor: Bozidar Lisac
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SUPPLYING A LOAD WITH ELECTRIC ENERGY RECOVERY
ABSTRACT
In the invention an electric current circulates from the battery UB, through the electric motor M, and the diode D1
charges the capacitors CA and CB, connected in parallel, which, once charged, are connected in series, giving
rise to a difference in voltage in relation to the battery, causing half the charge of the capacitors to be returned to
the battery through the diode D2, whilst with a new parallel connection, the capacitors recharge, this charge being
equal to that which had been previously transferred from the capacitors to the battery, so that by means of the
5 - 38